Suppr超能文献

小阻力血管对降压治疗的差异性结构反应。

Differential structural responses of small resistance vessels to antihypertensive therapy.

作者信息

Sano T, Tarazi R C

出版信息

Circulation. 1987 Mar;75(3):618-26. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.75.3.618.

Abstract

Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after control of blood pressure has been documented with some antihypertensive agents but not with others. To determine whether similar differences in regression of wall thickening also occur in resistance vessels during treatment, matched groups of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were treated for 12 weeks with either hydralazine (H) or captopril and hydrochlorothiazide (C-D) and they were compared with untreated SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). Perfusion pressure was then determined in the hindlimbs of pithed rats under conditions of constant blood flow (4.0 ml/min) and maximal vasodilation (hemodilution to 22% hematocrit combined with continuous nitroprusside and papaverine infusion). This perfusion pressure, which has been validated as an index of thickening (hypertrophy) of resistance vessels walls, averaged 26.8 +/- 0.4(SE) mm Hg in untreated WKY (n = 12) and 37.6 +/- 0.4 mm Hg in untreated SHR (n = 11) (p less than .01). Treatment with H or C-D controlled blood pressure equally in SHR, but the two drugs had significantly different effects on both left ventricular hypertrophy and resistance vessels. Perfusion pressure was reduced from 37.6 +/- 0.4 mm Hg to 34.0 +/- 0.5 mm Hg (p less than .01) with C-D but only to 36.5 +/- 0.5 mm Hg with H (NS). Left ventricular weight was significantly reduced by C-D (2.02 +/- 0.02 vs 2.63 +/- 0.05 mg/g, p less than .01) but only to 2.44 +/- 0.05 mg/g by H.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

一些抗高血压药物已被证明可使血压得到控制后左心室肥厚消退,但其他药物则不然。为了确定治疗期间阻力血管壁增厚的消退是否也存在类似差异,将配对的自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)分为两组,分别用肼屈嗪(H)或卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪(C-D)治疗12周,并与未治疗的SHR和Wistar-Kyoto大鼠(WKY)进行比较。然后在恒定血流(4.0毫升/分钟)和最大血管舒张(血液稀释至血细胞比容为22%,同时持续输注硝普钠和罂粟碱)条件下,测定脊髓麻醉大鼠后肢的灌注压。这种灌注压已被确认为阻力血管壁增厚(肥大)的指标,未治疗的WKY(n = 12)平均为26.8±0.4(SE)毫米汞柱,未治疗的SHR(n = 11)平均为37.6±0.4毫米汞柱(p<0.01)。H或C-D治疗可使SHR的血压得到同等程度的控制,但两种药物对左心室肥厚和阻力血管的影响却有显著差异。C-D可使灌注压从37.6±0.4毫米汞柱降至34.0±0.5毫米汞柱(p<0.01),而H仅使其降至36.5±0.5毫米汞柱(无统计学意义)。C-D可使左心室重量显著降低(2.02±0.02对2.63±0.05毫克/克,p<0.01),而H仅使其降至2.44±0.05毫克/克。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验