Sites Jack W, Peccinini-Seale Denise M, Moritz Craig, Wright John W, Brown Wesley M
Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, 05499, Sao Paulo, BRAZIL.
Evolution. 1990 Jul;44(4):906-921. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03813.x.
Chromosomes and allozymes were studied from chromosomally distinct unisexual (races B and C) and bisexual (races D and E) populations of the teiid lizard Cnemidophorus lemniscatus, and from selected outgroup taxa (C. murinus, C. nigricolor, Ameiva ameiva, and A. auberi). Karyotyping confirmed the racial identity of individuals and showed that the chromosomal composition of populations at specific localities has remained the same for 20 years. All individuals of both unisexual populations were heterozygous for a pericentric inversion that distinguishes D and E bisexuals. Also, the unisexuals were all heterozygous for 8 of 11 protein loci for which D and E were fixed or nearly fixed for different alleles. Most of these alleles represent derived states relative to the other Cnemidophorus and Ameiva analyzed, and the fixed heterozygote condition at these nine markers provides unequivocal support for the hypothesis that the unisexual C. lemniscatus arose by hybridization between ancestors genetically similar to extant D and E populations. At the remaining three loci for which D and E show fixed differences, the unisexuals were homozygous rather than heterozygous. This suggests that either (1) allozymes have been lost by mutations to null, silent, or convergent mobility states, (2) ancestral genotypes were similar to but not identical with the extant D and E races, and/or (3) limited recombination may occur between unisexual genomes. Allozyme-based genetic distances between D and E were large, suggesting that bisexual races D and E are genetically isolated; each race should be accorded full species status. This conclusion is supported by the absence of any clear biochemical evidence for their monophyly with respect to the other Cnemidophorus examined. Cladistic analyses of 17 phylogenetically informative loci revealed two equally parsimonious shortest trees, one supporting monophyly and the other paraphyly of the C. lemniscatus complex. Further testing of the monophyly of C. lemniscatus requires additional data. With the present study, the evidence that all parthenogenetic Cnemidophorus are of hybrid origin is complete.
对鞭尾蜥属蜥蜴丽纹鞭尾蜥(Cnemidophorus lemniscatus)染色体上不同的单性种群(B和C族)和两性种群(D和E族)以及选定的外类群分类单元(穆氏鞭尾蜥(C. murinus)、黑鞭尾蜥(C. nigricolor)、亚马逊鞭尾蜥(Ameiva ameiva)和奥氏鞭尾蜥(A. auberi))的染色体和等位酶进行了研究。核型分析证实了个体的种族身份,并表明特定地点种群的染色体组成在20年内保持不变。两个单性种群的所有个体都因一个臂间倒位而杂合,该倒位可区分D和E两性种群。此外,对于11个蛋白质位点中的8个,单性种群的个体均为杂合子,而D和E两性种群在这些位点上固定或几乎固定为不同的等位基因。相对于其他分析过的鞭尾蜥属和亚马逊鞭尾蜥属物种,这些等位基因中的大多数代表衍生状态,并且这九个标记位点上的固定杂合子状态为单性丽纹鞭尾蜥是由与现存D和E种群基因相似的祖先杂交产生这一假说提供了明确支持。在D和E显示固定差异的其余三个位点上,单性种群的个体是纯合子而非杂合子。这表明要么(1)等位酶因突变为无效、沉默或趋同迁移状态而丢失,(2)祖先基因型与现存的D和E族相似但不相同,和/或(3)单性基因组之间可能发生有限的重组。D和E之间基于等位酶的遗传距离很大,这表明两性种群D和E在遗传上是隔离的;每个种群都应被赋予完整的物种地位。这一结论得到了以下事实的支持:在与其他所研究的鞭尾蜥属物种的关系中,没有任何明确的生化证据表明它们是单系的。对17个系统发育信息位点的分支分析揭示了两棵同样简约的最短树,一棵支持丽纹鞭尾蜥复合体的单系性,另一棵支持并系性。对丽纹鞭尾蜥单系性的进一步检验需要更多数据。通过本研究,所有孤雌生殖的鞭尾蜥属物种都起源于杂交的证据是完整的。