O'Hara Jamie, Hughes David, Camp Charlotte, Burke Tom, Carroll Liz, Diego Daniel-Anibal Garcia
Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Chester, UK.
HCD Economics, Daresbury, UK.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 May 31;12(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0660-y.
Severe haemophilia is associated with major psychological and economic burden for patients, caregivers, and the wider health care system. This burden has been quantified and documented for a number of European countries in recent years. However, few studies have taken a standardised methodology across multiple countries simultaneously, and sought to amalgamate all three levels of burden for severe disease. The overall aim of the 'Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey' (CHESS) study was to capture the annualised economic and psychosocial burden of severe haemophilia in five European countries. A cross-section of haemophilia specialists (surveyed between January and April 2015) provided demographic and clinical information and 12-month ambulatory and secondary care activity for patients via an online survey. In turn, patients provided corresponding direct and indirect non-medical cost information, including work loss and out-of-pocket expenses, as well as information on quality of life and adherence. The direct and indirect costs for the patient sample were calculated and extrapolated to population level.
Clinical reports for a total of 1,285 patients were received. Five hundred and fifty-two patients (43% of the sample) provided information on indirect costs and health-related quality of life via the PSC. The total annual cost of severe haemophilia across the five countries for 2014 was estimated at EUR 1.4 billion, or just under EUR 200,000 per patient. The highest per-patient costs were in Germany (mean EUR 319,024) and the lowest were in the United Kingdom (mean EUR 129,365), with a study average of EUR 199,541. As expected, consumption of clotting factor replacement therapy represented the vast majority of costs (up to 99%). Indirect costs are driven by patient and caregiver work loss.
The results of the CHESS study reflect previous research findings suggesting that costs of factor replacement therapy account for the vast majority of the cost burden in severe haemophilia. However, the importance of the indirect impact of haemophilia on the patient and family should not be overlooked. The CHESS study highlights the benefits of observational study methodologies in capturing a 'snapshot' of information for patients with rare diseases.
重度血友病给患者、护理人员及更广泛的医疗保健系统带来了重大心理和经济负担。近年来,一些欧洲国家已对这一负担进行了量化和记录。然而,很少有研究同时在多个国家采用标准化方法,并试图汇总重度疾病的所有三个层面的负担。“欧洲血友病成本:社会经济调查”(CHESS)研究的总体目标是了解五个欧洲国家重度血友病的年度经济和心理社会负担。一组血友病专家(于2015年1月至4月接受调查)通过在线调查提供了患者的人口统计学和临床信息以及12个月的门诊和二级护理活动情况。相应地,患者提供了直接和间接非医疗成本信息,包括工作损失和自付费用,以及生活质量和依从性信息。计算了患者样本的直接和间接成本,并推算至人口水平。
共收到1285例患者的临床报告。552例患者(占样本的43%)通过患者社会成本问卷提供了间接成本和健康相关生活质量信息。2014年五个国家重度血友病的年度总成本估计为14亿欧元,即每位患者略低于20万欧元。每位患者成本最高的是德国(平均319,024欧元),最低的是英国(平均129,365欧元),研究平均为199,541欧元。正如预期的那样,凝血因子替代疗法的消耗占成本的绝大部分(高达99%)。间接成本由患者和护理人员的工作损失驱动。
CHESS研究结果反映了先前的研究发现,即因子替代疗法的成本占重度血友病成本负担的绝大部分。然而,血友病对患者和家庭的间接影响的重要性不应被忽视。CHESS研究突出了观察性研究方法在获取罕见病患者信息“快照”方面的益处。