Chi C, Yu S-K, Auckle R, Argyris A A, Nasothimiou E, Tountas C, Aissopou E, Blacher J, Safar M E, Sfikakis P P, Zhang Y, Protogerou A D
Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hypertension Center and Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, 1st Department of Propaedeutic Medicine, 'Laiko' Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Oct;31(10):633-639. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2017.37. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Both brachial blood pressure (BP) level and its variability (BPV) significantly associate with left ventricular (LV) structure and function. Recent studies indicate that aortic BP is superior to brachial BP in the association with LV abnormalities. However, it remains unknown whether aortic BPV better associate with LV structural and functional abnormalities. We therefore aimed to investigate and compare aortic versus brachial BPV, in terms of the identification of LV abnormalities. Two hundred and three participants who underwent echocardiography were included in this study. Twenty-four-hour aortic and brachial ambulatory BP was measured simultaneously by a validated BP monitor (Mobil-O-Graph, Stolberg, Germany) and BPV was calculated with validated formulae. LV mass and LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) were evaluated by echocardiography. The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LVH) and LVDD increased significantly with BPV indices (P⩽0.04) in trend tests. After adjustment to potential confounders, only aortic average real variability (ARV), but not brachial ARV or weighted s.d. (wSD, neither aortic nor brachial) significantly associated with LV mass index (P=0.02). Similar results were observed in logistic regression. After adjustment, only aortic ARV significantly associated with LVH (odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.28 (1.08, 4.82)). As for LVDD, neither the brachial nor the aortic 24-hour wSD, but the aortic and brachial ARV, associated with LVDD significantly, with OR=2.28 (95% CI: (1.03, 5.02)) and OR=2.36 (95% CI: (1.10, 5.05)), respectively. In summary, aortic BPV, especially aortic ARV, seems to be superior to brachial BPV in the association of LV structural and functional abnormalities.
肱动脉血压(BP)水平及其变异性(BPV)均与左心室(LV)结构和功能显著相关。近期研究表明,在与LV异常的关联方面,主动脉血压优于肱动脉血压。然而,主动脉BPV是否与LV结构和功能异常有更好的关联仍不清楚。因此,我们旨在就LV异常的识别,研究并比较主动脉与肱动脉的BPV。本研究纳入了203名接受超声心动图检查的参与者。通过经过验证的血压监测仪(德国斯托尔贝格的Mobil-O-Graph)同时测量24小时主动脉和肱动脉动态血压,并使用经过验证的公式计算BPV。通过超声心动图评估LV质量和LV舒张功能障碍(LVDD)。在趋势检验中,LV肥厚(LVH)和LVDD的患病率随BPV指数显著增加(P⩽0.04)。在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,仅主动脉平均实际变异性(ARV)与LV质量指数显著相关(P = 0.02),而肱动脉ARV或加权标准差(wSD,包括主动脉和肱动脉的wSD)均无此关联。在逻辑回归分析中观察到类似结果。校正后,仅主动脉ARV与LVH显著相关(比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI):2.28(1.08,4.82))。至于LVDD,主动脉和肱动脉的24小时wSD均与LVDD无显著关联,但主动脉和肱动脉ARV与LVDD显著相关,OR分别为2.28(95%CI:(1.03,5.02))和2.36(95%CI:(1.10,5.05))。总之,在LV结构和功能异常的关联方面,主动脉BPV,尤其是主动脉ARV,似乎优于肱动脉BPV。