Thometz Nicole M, Dearolf Jennifer L, Dunkin Robin C, Noren Dawn P, Holt Marla M, Sims Olivia C, Cathey Brandon C, Williams Terrie M
Department of Biology, University of San Francisco, 2130 Fulton St, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Long Marine Laboratory, University of California at Santa Cruz, 115 McAllister Way, Santa Cruz, CA, 95060, USA.
J Comp Physiol B. 2018 Jan;188(1):177-193. doi: 10.1007/s00360-017-1106-5. Epub 2017 May 31.
The mechanism by which odontocetes produce sound is unique among mammals. To gain insight into the physiological properties that support sound production in toothed whales, we examined myoglobin content ([Mb]), non-bicarbonate buffering capacity (β), fiber-type profiles, and myosin heavy chain expression of vocal musculature in two odontocetes: the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus; n = 4) and the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena; n = 5). Both species use the same anatomical structures to produce sound, but differ markedly in their vocal repertoires. Tursiops produce both broadband clicks and tonal whistles, while Phocoena only produce higher frequency clicks. Specific muscles examined in this study included: (1) the nasal musculature around the phonic lips on the right (RNM) and left (LNM) sides of the head, (2) the palatopharyngeal sphincter (PPS), which surrounds the larynx and aids in pressurizing cranial air spaces, and (3) the genioglossus complex (GGC), a group of muscles positioned ventrally within the head. Overall, vocal muscles had significantly lower [Mb] and β than locomotor muscles from the same species. The PPS was predominately composed of small diameter slow-twitch fibers. Fiber-type and myosin heavy chain analyses revealed that the GGC was comprised largely of fast-twitch fibers (Tursiops: 88.6%, Phocoena: 79.7%) and had the highest β of all vocal muscles. Notably, there was a significant difference in [Mb] between the RNM and LNM in Tursiops, but not Phocoena. Our results reveal shared physiological characteristics of individual vocal muscles across species that enhance our understanding of key functional roles, as well as species-specific differences which appear to reflect differences in vocal capacities.
鲸类动物发声的机制在哺乳动物中是独一无二的。为了深入了解支持齿鲸发声的生理特性,我们研究了两种齿鲸——宽吻海豚(瓶鼻海豚,Tursiops truncatus;n = 4)和港湾鼠海豚(Phocoena phocoena;n = 5)——发声肌肉组织中的肌红蛋白含量([Mb])、非碳酸氢盐缓冲能力(β)、纤维类型分布以及肌球蛋白重链表达。这两个物种利用相同的解剖结构发声,但它们的发声 repertoire 有显著差异。宽吻海豚既能发出宽带咔嗒声,也能发出音调哨声,而港湾鼠海豚只发出高频咔嗒声。本研究中检测的特定肌肉包括:(1)头部右侧(RNM)和左侧(LNM)声唇周围的鼻腔肌肉组织,(2)围绕喉部并有助于对颅腔气室增压的腭咽括约肌(PPS),以及(3)位于头部腹侧的一组肌肉——颏舌肌复合体(GGC)。总体而言,发声肌肉的[Mb]和β显著低于同一物种的运动肌肉。PPS 主要由小直径慢肌纤维组成。纤维类型和肌球蛋白重链分析表明,GGC 主要由快肌纤维组成(宽吻海豚:88.6%,港湾鼠海豚:79.7%),并且在所有发声肌肉中β最高。值得注意的是,宽吻海豚的 RNM 和 LNM 之间的[Mb]存在显著差异,而港湾鼠海豚则没有。我们的研究结果揭示了不同物种个体发声肌肉的共同生理特征,这增进了我们对关键功能作用的理解,同时也揭示了物种特异性差异,这些差异似乎反映了发声能力的差异。