Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Jun;47(3):307-325. doi: 10.1177/0306312717706559. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
The introduction to this special issue argues that network breakdowns play an important and unacknowledged role in the shaping and emergence of scientific knowledge. It focuses on transnational scientific networks from the early modern Republic of Letters to 21st-century globalized science. It attempts to unite the disparate historiography of the early modern Republic of Letters, the literature on 20th-century globalization, and the scholarship on Actor-Network Theory. We can perceive two, seemingly contradictory, changes to scientific networks over the past four hundred years. At the level of individuals, networks have become increasing fragile, as developments in communication and transportation technologies, and the emergence of regimes of standardization and instrumentation, have made it easier both to create new constellations of people and materials, and to replace and rearrange them. But at the level of institutions, collaborations have become much more extensive and long-lived, with single projects routinely outlasting even the arc of a full scientific career. In the modern world, the strength of institutions and macro-networks often relies on ideological regimes of standardization and instrumentation that can flexibly replace elements and individuals at will.
本特刊引言认为,网络故障在科学知识的形成和出现中起着重要而未被承认的作用。它侧重于从早期现代的学术共和国到 21 世纪全球化的科学的跨国科学网络。它试图将早期现代学术共和国的不同历史编纂学、20 世纪全球化的文献以及行动者网络理论的学术研究结合起来。在过去的四百年里,我们可以看到科学网络发生了两个看似矛盾的变化。在个人层面上,网络变得越来越脆弱,因为通信和交通技术的发展,以及标准化和仪器化制度的出现,使得人们更容易创造出新的人群和材料组合,并对其进行替换和重新排列。但在机构层面上,合作变得更加广泛和持久,单个项目通常比整个科学职业生涯的时间还要长。在现代世界,机构和宏观网络的力量往往依赖于可以灵活地随意替换元素和个体的标准化和仪器化的意识形态制度。