Newhall Karina, Burnette Mary, Brooke Benjamin S, Schanzer Andres, Tan TzeWoei, Flocke Susan, Farber Alik, Goodney Philip
Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):1011-7.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.086. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Although smoking cessation is a key priority emphasized by professional societies and multidisciplinary consensus guidelines, significant variation exists in the methods and efficacy of smoking cessation treatment practiced by vascular surgeons. We conducted a series of patient, surgeon, and nonpatient stakeholder focus groups to identify important domains for establishment of a successful smoking cessation program.
As part of a planning effort for a randomized clinical trial on usual care vs a standardized, evidence-based smoking cessation intervention, our group performed a series of interviews and focus groups. These were four 1-hour interviews, conducted with stakeholders such as tobacco cessation counselors (n = 2), a Quit Line representative (n = 1), and a Vascular Quality Initiative leader (n = 1), as well as two 90-minute, formal, professionally moderated focus groups, one with vascular surgeons (n = 7), and another with patients (n = 4). Transcripts and audio recordings were qualitatively reviewed for themes to establish the most important domains perceived to be associated with a successful smoking cessation program.
Patients emphasized four domains critical for a successful smoking cessation program: the motivation to quit, an individualized approach, the timing of an intervention, and the tone of the physician who offers counseling. Although surgeons and nonpatient stakeholders also emphasized the importance of a compassionate physician tone, surgeons and nonpatient stakeholders differed from patients in their remaining domains. They emphasized the feasibility of a brief intervention in a busy clinical practice, implementation of the effort, and necessary infrastructure for smoking cessation programs. All focus group participants described a brief, evidence-based smoking cessation intervention as feasible in routine vascular practice.
Differences in motivation and significance exist for patients, surgeons, and stakeholders when they considered the specific domains most important in building a successful smoking cessation program. Despite these differences, all parties involved agreed that a brief, standardized intervention can be successful delivered in a busy vascular clinic setting.
尽管戒烟是专业协会和多学科共识指南强调的关键优先事项,但血管外科医生实施的戒烟治疗方法和效果存在显著差异。我们开展了一系列患者、外科医生和非患者利益相关者焦点小组讨论,以确定建立成功戒烟计划的重要领域。
作为一项关于常规护理与标准化、循证戒烟干预的随机临床试验规划工作的一部分,我们小组进行了一系列访谈和焦点小组讨论。这些包括与戒烟顾问(n = 2)、戒烟热线代表(n = 1)和血管质量倡议负责人(n = 1)等利益相关者进行的四次1小时访谈,以及两个90分钟、由专业人员主持的正式焦点小组讨论,一个是与血管外科医生(n = 7)进行的,另一个是与患者(n = 4)进行的。对访谈记录和录音进行定性审查以找出主题,从而确定被认为与成功戒烟计划相关的最重要领域。
患者强调了成功戒烟计划至关重要的四个领域:戒烟动机、个性化方法、干预时机以及提供咨询的医生的语气。虽然外科医生和非患者利益相关者也强调了富有同情心的医生语气的重要性,但外科医生和非患者利益相关者在其余领域与患者不同。他们强调在繁忙的临床实践中进行简短干预的可行性、实施工作以及戒烟计划所需的基础设施。所有焦点小组参与者都认为在常规血管实践中进行简短的循证戒烟干预是可行的。
在考虑构建成功戒烟计划中最重要的特定领域时,患者、外科医生和利益相关者在动机和重要性方面存在差异。尽管存在这些差异,但所有相关方都一致认为,在繁忙的血管诊所环境中可以成功实施简短的标准化干预。