Suppr超能文献

国内外乳腺癌差异:系统层面变革的挑战与机遇综述

Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.

作者信息

Reeder-Hayes Katherine E, Anderson Benjamin O

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

The University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2655-2664. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2630.

Abstract

Sizeable disparities exist in breast cancer outcomes, both between Black and White patients in the United States, and between patients in the United States and other high-income countries compared with low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). In both settings, health system factors are key drivers of disparities. In the United States, Black women are more likely to die of breast cancer than Whites and have poorer outcomes, even among patients with similar stage and tumor subtype. Over-representation of higher risk "triple-negative" breast cancers contributes to breast cancer mortality in Black women; however, the greatest survival disparities occur within the good-prognosis hormone receptor-positive (HR) subtypes. Disparities in access to treatment within the complex U.S. health system may be responsible for a substantial portion of these differences in survival. In LMICs, breast cancer mortality rates are substantially higher than in the United States, whereas incidence continues to rise. This mortality burden is largely attributable to health system factors, including late-stage presentation at diagnosis and lack of availability of systemic therapy. This article will review the existing evidence for how health system factors in the United States contribute to breast cancer disparities, discuss methods for studying the relationship of health system factors to racial disparities, and provide examples of health system interventions that show promise for mitigating breast cancer disparities. We will then review evidence of global breast cancer disparities in LMICs, the treatment factors that contribute to these disparities, and actions being taken to combat breast cancer disparities around the world.

摘要

乳腺癌治疗结果存在显著差异,在美国黑人和白人患者之间如此,在美国与其他高收入国家的患者相比以及与低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)相比亦是如此。在这两种情况下,卫生系统因素都是差异的关键驱动因素。在美国,黑人女性死于乳腺癌的可能性高于白人,且治疗结果更差,即使在具有相似分期和肿瘤亚型的患者中也是如此。高风险“三阴性”乳腺癌在黑人女性中占比过高,这导致了她们的乳腺癌死亡率;然而,最大的生存差异出现在预后良好的激素受体阳性(HR)亚型中。在美国复杂的卫生系统中,获得治疗的差异可能是这些生存差异的很大一部分原因。在低收入和中等收入国家,乳腺癌死亡率远高于美国,而发病率持续上升。这种死亡负担很大程度上归因于卫生系统因素,包括诊断时的晚期表现和缺乏全身治疗手段。本文将回顾关于美国卫生系统因素如何导致乳腺癌差异的现有证据,讨论研究卫生系统因素与种族差异关系的方法,并提供一些有望减轻乳腺癌差异的卫生系统干预措施的例子。然后,我们将回顾低收入和中等收入国家全球乳腺癌差异的证据、导致这些差异的治疗因素以及世界各地为消除乳腺癌差异而采取的行动。

相似文献

1
Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2655-2664. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2630.
3
Assessing the Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality in the United States.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 May 5;14(5):486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14050486.
5
Disparities in breast cancer subtypes among women in the lower Mississippi Delta Region states.
Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jun;30(6):591-601. doi: 10.1007/s10552-019-01168-0. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Breast cancer racial disparities: unanswered questions.
Cancer Res. 2011 Feb 1;71(3):640-4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3021. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
7
8
Searching beyond the Lamppost to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031186.
9
The influence of socioeconomic disparities on breast cancer tumor biology and prognosis: a review.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jun;18(6):883-93. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1127.
10
Health Disparities and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in African American Women: A Review.
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):485-493. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0005.

引用本文的文献

1
3
Survival Disparities among Cancer Patients Based on Mobility Patterns: A Population-Based Study.
Health Data Sci. 2024 Nov 5;10:0198. doi: 10.34133/hds.0198. eCollection 2024.
4
Single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic map of breast tissues of women of diverse genetic ancestry.
Nat Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):3482-3494. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03011-9. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
5
Race, Gene Expression Signatures, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2349646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49646.
6
Economic Perspective of Cancer Care and Its Consequences for Vulnerable Groups.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;14(13):3158. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133158.
7
Gene-Level Germline Contributions to Clinical Risk of Recurrence Scores in Black and White Patients with Breast Cancer.
Cancer Res. 2022 Jan 1;82(1):25-35. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1207. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
9
Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and black race: does sex matter?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Nov;190(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06359-5. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Racial Differences in PAM50 Subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx135.
2
Resource-Stratified Guidelines for Cancer Management: Correction and Commentary.
J Glob Oncol. 2016 Aug 31;3(1):84-88. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.006213. eCollection 2017 Feb.
3
Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: What Are We Missing?
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2640-2646. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2569.
4
Translational Genomics: Practical Applications of the Genomic Revolution in Breast Cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2630-2639. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2548.
5
Mutational Signatures in Breast Cancer: The Problem at the DNA Level.
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2617-2629. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2810.
6
Resource Use and Medicare Costs During Lay Navigation for Geriatric Patients With Cancer.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):817-825. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307.
7
Access to Accredited Cancer Hospitals Within Federal Exchange Plans Under the Affordable Care Act.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;35(6):645-651. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9835. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
9
A Statewide Intervention Improves Appropriate Imaging in Localized Prostate Cancer.
J Urol. 2017 May;197(5):1222-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.098. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
10
Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1474-1482. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0148.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验