• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于保险的乳腺钼靶筛查阳性后诊断性随访时间差异

Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography.

作者信息

Durham Danielle D, Robinson Whitney R, Lee Sheila S, Wheeler Stephanie B, Reeder-Hayes Katherine E, Bowling J Michael, Olshan Andrew F, Henderson Louise M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1474-1482. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0148.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0148
PMID:27803069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5115635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insurance may lengthen or inhibit time to follow-up after positive screening mammography. We assessed the association between insurance status and time to initial diagnostic follow-up after a positive screening mammogram.

METHODS

Using 1995-2010 data from a North Carolina population-based registry of breast imaging and cancer outcomes, we identified women with a positive screening mammogram. We compared receipt of follow-up within 60 days of screening using logistic regression and evaluated time to follow-up initiation using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Among 43,026 women included in the study, 73% were <65 years and 27% were 65+ years. Median time until initial diagnostic follow-up was similar by age group and insurance status. In the adjusted model for women <65, uninsured women experienced a longer time to initiation of diagnostic follow-up [HR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.25-0.89] versus women with private insurance. There were increased odds of these uninsured women not meeting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for follow-up within 60 days (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.31-1.94). Among women ages 65+, women with private insurance experienced a faster time to follow-up (adjusted HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.27-3.44) than women with Medicare and private insurance. Approximately 10% of women had no follow-up by 365 days.

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in time to initial diagnostic follow-up after a positive screening mammogram by insurance status and age group. Uninsured women younger than 65 years at a positive screening event had delayed follow-up.

IMPACT

Replication of these findings and examination of their clinical significance warrant additional investigation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(11); 1474-82. ©2016 AACR.

摘要

背景

保险可能会延长或阻碍乳腺钼靶筛查呈阳性后的随访时间。我们评估了保险状况与乳腺钼靶筛查呈阳性后首次诊断性随访时间之间的关联。

方法

利用北卡罗来纳州基于人群的乳腺成像与癌症结局登记处1995 - 2010年的数据,我们确定了乳腺钼靶筛查呈阳性的女性。我们使用逻辑回归比较了筛查后60天内接受随访的情况,并使用Cox比例风险回归评估了随访开始的时间。

结果

在纳入研究的43,026名女性中,73%年龄小于65岁,27%年龄在65岁及以上。按年龄组和保险状况划分,直至首次诊断性随访的中位时间相似。在针对年龄小于65岁女性的调整模型中,与有私人保险的女性相比,未参保女性开始诊断性随访的时间更长[风险比(HR),0.47;95%置信区间(CI),0.25 - 0.89]。这些未参保女性未达到疾病控制与预防中心60天内随访指南的几率增加(比值比,1.59;95% CI,1.31 - 1.94)。在65岁及以上的女性中,有私人保险的女性比有医疗保险和私人保险的女性随访时间更快(调整后HR,2.09;95% CI,1.27 - 3.44)。约10%的女性在365天时尚未进行随访。

结论

我们发现乳腺钼靶筛查呈阳性后首次诊断性随访时间因保险状况和年龄组而异。乳腺钼靶筛查呈阳性时年龄小于65岁的未参保女性随访延迟。

影响

重复这些发现并检查其临床意义值得进一步研究。《癌症流行病学、生物标志物与预防》;25(11);1474 - 82。©2016美国癌症研究协会。

相似文献

1
Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography.基于保险的乳腺钼靶筛查阳性后诊断性随访时间差异
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Nov;25(11):1474-1482. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0148.
2
Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者因保险状况导致的治疗差异。
Breast J. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):128-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00542.x.
3
Health insurance and other factors associated with mammography surveillance among breast cancer survivors: results from a national survey.健康保险及其他因素与乳腺癌幸存者乳房 X 线摄影监测的关系:一项全国性调查的结果。
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):270-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318244d294.
4
Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.最近接受过乳房 X 光筛查的女性中,自费进行乳房 X 光筛查的比例。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):910-918. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6973. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
5
Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008.生命体征:50-74 岁女性的乳腺癌筛查 - 美国,2008 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Jul 9;59(26):813-6.
6
Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.需要进行乳腺筛查的女性对乳腺筛查保险覆盖范围的认知。
Cancer. 2005 Jun 15;103(12):2473-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21068.
7
Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40-64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005.1993年和2005年美国40至64岁女性在乳房X光检查使用方面存在的种族、族裔、收入及健康保险状况差异。
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):692-700. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817893b1.
8
Healthcare Use and Mammography Among Latinas With and Without Health Insurance Near the US-Mexico Border.美墨边境有和没有医疗保险的拉丁裔女性的医疗保健使用情况和乳房 X 光检查。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Apr;4(2):282-287. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0227-y. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
9
[Equity regarding early breast cancer screening according to health insurance status in Colombia].[哥伦比亚根据健康保险状况进行早期乳腺癌筛查的公平性]
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2008 Aug-Oct;10(4):571-82. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642008000400007.
10
Increased Risk of Developing Breast Cancer after a False-Positive Screening Mammogram.乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性后患乳腺癌风险增加。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Dec;24(12):1882-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0623.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Management Pathways for Workup of Abnormal Screening With Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.数字化乳腺钼靶摄影与数字化乳腺断层合成筛查异常的诊断管理路径
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Aug;22(8):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.04.008. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Racial Disparities and Strategies for Improving Equity in Diagnostic Follow-Up for Abnormal Screening Mammograms.种族差异与改善异常筛检性乳房 X 光片诊断后公平性的策略。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Oct;20(10):1367-1375. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00782. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
From Race to Racism and Disparities to Equity: An Actionable Biopsychosocial Approach to Breast Cancer Outcomes.从种族到种族主义,从差异到公平:一种可行的乳腺癌结局的生物心理社会方法。
Cancer J. 2023;29(6):316-322. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000677.
4
Gene-Level Germline Contributions to Clinical Risk of Recurrence Scores in Black and White Patients with Breast Cancer.基因水平的种系对黑人和白人乳腺癌患者复发评分的临床风险的贡献。
Cancer Res. 2022 Jan 1;82(1):25-35. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1207. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Racial Disparities in Diagnostic Delay Among Women With Breast Cancer.乳腺癌女性诊断延迟中的种族差异。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Oct;18(10):1384-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
6
Screening Mammogram Adherence in Medically Underserved Women: Does Language Preference Matter?医疗资源匮乏人群中女性接受乳房 X 光筛查的情况:语言偏好是否重要?
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Aug;37(4):1076-1082. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01922-y. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
7
Impact of Improved Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letter Readability on Patient Follow-Up.提高筛查性乳房 X 光照片召回告知信可读性对患者随访的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11):1429-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
8
Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.及时随访癌症筛查阳性结果:PROSPR 联盟的系统评价和建议。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 May;68(3):199-216. doi: 10.3322/caac.21452. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Breast Cancer Disparities at Home and Abroad: A Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for System-Level Change.国内外乳腺癌差异:系统层面变革的挑战与机遇综述
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;23(11):2655-2664. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2630.

本文引用的文献

1
Insurance status effects on stage of diagnosis and surgical options used in the treatment of breast cancer.保险状况对乳腺癌诊断分期及治疗中所采用手术方案的影响。
South Med J. 2015 May;108(5):258-61. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000281.
2
Variation in Breast Cancer-Risk Factor Associations by Method of Detection: Results From a Series of Case-Control Studies.乳腺癌风险因素关联在不同检测方法中的差异:一系列病例对照研究的结果
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 15;181(12):956-69. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu474. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests: considering the multilevel context of care.癌症筛查异常结果的后续跟进:考量多层次医疗背景
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Oct;23(10):1965-73. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0454. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
4
Insurance status and distant-stage disease at diagnosis among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer aged 15 to 39 years: National Cancer Data Base, 2004 through 2010.保险状况和诊断时的远处转移疾病在年龄为 15 至 39 岁的青少年和年轻成年癌症患者中:国家癌症数据库,2004 年至 2010 年。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;120(8):1212-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28568. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
5
Barriers reported among patients with breast and cervical abnormalities in the patient navigation research program: impact on timely care.患者导航研究计划中报告的乳腺和宫颈异常患者存在的障碍:对及时护理的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):e155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.010.
6
Social service barriers delay care among women with abnormal cancer screening.社会服务障碍延误了癌症筛查异常女性的治疗。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2615-x. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
7
A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram.多层次研究视角下的癌症护理提供:以异常乳房 X 光片随访为例。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Oct;21(10):1709-15. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0265. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
8
Language barriers, location of care, and delays in follow-up of abnormal mammograms.语言障碍、就诊地点以及异常乳房 X 光片随访的延误。
Med Care. 2012 Feb;50(2):171-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31822dcf2d.
9
Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammogram: variability of facilities.异常筛查乳房 X 光片后的随访及时性:医疗机构的差异。
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):404-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102472. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
10
Having health insurance does not eliminate race/ethnicity-associated delays in breast cancer diagnosis in the District of Columbia.拥有健康保险并不能消除哥伦比亚特区中与种族/民族相关的乳腺癌诊断延迟。
Cancer. 2011 Aug 15;117(16):3824-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25970. Epub 2011 Feb 24.