Langer Shelby, Lehane Christine, Yi Jean
Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 500 North Third Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017 Aug;12(4):324-334. doi: 10.1007/s11899-017-0391-0.
The aims of this study were to identify and systematically evaluate studies published from 2005-2017 that took a dyadic approach to assessing or intervening upon hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients and their informal caregivers.
Our search yielded 20 studies. Regarding sample demographic characteristics, most participants were Caucasian and most caregivers were related to the patient by marriage. Regarding design characteristics, 18 studies were quantitative and two were qualitative; five were cross-sectional, ten were longitudinal, one was experimental, and four were interventional. Most outcomes were psychosocial and the interventions were largely psycho-educational in nature. Large variation in quality of the studies emerged (six were rated as low quality, seven as adequate, and seven as high quality). Understudied populations include racial/ethnic minorities and same-sex couples. More work is needed to understand functioning during survivorship and impacts on patient medical outcomes, and to truly leverage the dyad to optimize individual- and relationship-level adjustment.
本研究旨在识别并系统评价2005年至2017年发表的采用二元方法评估或干预造血细胞移植(HCT)受者及其非正式照护者的研究。
我们的检索共得到20项研究。关于样本人口统计学特征,大多数参与者为白种人,大多数照护者与患者为婚姻关系。关于研究设计特征,18项研究为定量研究,2项为定性研究;5项为横断面研究,10项为纵向研究,1项为实验性研究,4项为干预性研究。大多数结局为心理社会方面的,干预措施在很大程度上具有心理教育性质。研究质量存在很大差异(6项被评为低质量,7项为中等质量,7项为高质量)。研究较少涉及的人群包括少数种族/族裔和同性伴侣。需要开展更多工作来了解生存期间的功能状况以及对患者医疗结局的影响,并真正利用二元关系来优化个体和关系层面的调整。