• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚城市流浪猫群落中的诱捕-绝育-放归活动。

Trap-Neuter-Return Activities in Urban Stray Cat Colonies in Australia.

作者信息

Tan Kuan, Rand Jacquie, Morton John

机构信息

School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia.

Australian Pet Welfare Foundation, Kenmore, Queensland 4069, Australia.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2017 Jun 2;7(6):46. doi: 10.3390/ani7060046.

DOI:10.3390/ani7060046
PMID:28574465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5483609/
Abstract

Trap, neuter and return (TNR) describes a non-lethal approach to the control of urban stray cat populations. Currently, in Australia, lethal control is common, with over 85% of cats entering some municipal pounds euthanized. No research has been published describing TNR activities in Australia. Adults involved with TNR in Australia were invited to participate. Data from 53 respondents were collected via an anonymous online questionnaire. Most respondents were females 36 to 65 years of age, and slightly more participated in TNR as individuals than as part of an organization. Respondents generally self-funded at least some of their TNR activities. The median number of colonies per respondent was 1.5 (range 1 to over 100). Median colony size declined from 11.5 to 6.5 cats under TNR over a median of 2.2 years, and the median percent reduction was 31%; this was achieved by rehoming cats and kittens and reducing reproduction. A median of 69% of cats in each colony were desexed at the time of reporting. Most respondents fed cats once or twice daily, and at least 28% of respondents microchipped cats. Prophylactic healthcare was provided to adult cats and kittens, commonly for intestinal parasites (at least 49%), and fleas (at least 46%); vaccinations were less common. Time-consuming activities for respondents were feeding (median 4 h/week) and locating resources (median 1.1 h/week). These findings indicate that TNR, when involving high desexing rates within colonies, adoption of kittens and friendly adults, and ongoing oversight by volunteer caretakers, can reduce cat numbers over time, improve health and welfare of cats and kittens, and is largely funded by private individuals and organizations.

摘要

诱捕、绝育和放归(TNR)描述了一种控制城市流浪猫数量的非致命方法。目前,在澳大利亚,致死性控制很常见,超过85%进入一些市政收容所的猫被安乐死。尚未有研究发表描述澳大利亚的TNR活动。邀请了参与澳大利亚TNR活动的成年人参与。通过匿名在线问卷收集了53名受访者的数据。大多数受访者为36至65岁的女性,以个人身份参与TNR的人数略多于作为组织一部分参与的人数。受访者通常至少自行承担部分TNR活动的费用。每位受访者管理的猫群中位数为1.5个(范围为1至100多个)。在中位数为2.2年的时间里,每个猫群的猫数量中位数从11.5只降至6.5只,中位数减少百分比为31%;这是通过安置猫咪和小猫以及减少繁殖实现的。在报告时,每个猫群中中位数为69%的猫已绝育。大多数受访者每天喂猫一到两次,至少28%的受访者为猫植入了微芯片。为成年猫和小猫提供预防性医疗保健,常见的是针对肠道寄生虫(至少49%)和跳蚤(至少46%);疫苗接种则较少见。受访者耗时的活动是喂食(中位数为每周4小时)和寻找资源(中位数为每周1.1小时)。这些发现表明,当TNR涉及猫群内的高绝育率、收养小猫和友好的成年猫以及志愿者照顾者的持续监督时,随着时间的推移可以减少猫的数量,改善猫和小猫的健康与福利,并且主要由私人个体和组织提供资金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ca9/5483609/afc804a3b71a/animals-07-00046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ca9/5483609/afc804a3b71a/animals-07-00046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ca9/5483609/afc804a3b71a/animals-07-00046-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Trap-Neuter-Return Activities in Urban Stray Cat Colonies in Australia.澳大利亚城市流浪猫群落中的诱捕-绝育-放归活动。
Animals (Basel). 2017 Jun 2;7(6):46. doi: 10.3390/ani7060046.
2
Application of a Protocol Based on Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) to Manage Unowned Urban Cats on an Australian University Campus.基于诱捕-绝育-放归(TNR)的方案在澳大利亚大学校园管理流浪猫中的应用
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 17;8(5):77. doi: 10.3390/ani8050077.
3
A Case of Letting the Cat out of The Bag-Why Trap-Neuter-Return Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat () Management.一个泄密的案例——为何诱捕-绝育-放归并非流浪猫管理的道德解决方案
Animals (Basel). 2019 Apr 16;9(4):171. doi: 10.3390/ani9040171.
4
Cat Colony Caretakers' Perceptions of Support and Opposition to TNR.猫咪群落照料者对TNR的支持与反对看法
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 4;6:57. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00057. eCollection 2019.
5
Reply to Crawford et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat Management.对克劳福德等人的回复:为何诱捕-绝育-放归(TNR)是流浪猫管理的一种道德解决方案。
Animals (Basel). 2019 Sep 16;9(9):689. doi: 10.3390/ani9090689.
6
Reply to Wolf et al.: Why Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR) Is Not an Ethical Solution for Stray Cat Management.回复沃尔夫等人:为何诱捕-绝育-放归(TNR)并非管理流浪猫的道德解决方案。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 28;10(9):1525. doi: 10.3390/ani10091525.
7
Public Opinions on Strategies for Managing Stray Cats and Predictors of Opposition to Trap-Neuter and Return in Brisbane, Australia.澳大利亚布里斯班市公众对流浪猫管理策略的看法以及反对诱捕-绝育-放归的预测因素
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Feb 18;5:290. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00290. eCollection 2018.
8
Response to Wolf et al.: Furthering Debate over the Suitability of Trap-Neuter-Return for Stray Cat Management.对沃尔夫等人的回应:深化关于诱捕-绝育-放归流浪猫管理适用性的辩论。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 23;10(2):362. doi: 10.3390/ani10020362.
9
Effect of high-impact targeted trap-neuter-return and adoption of community cats on cat intake to a shelter.高强度针对性诱捕-绝育-放归及收养社区猫对收容所猫只收容量的影响
Vet J. 2014 Sep;201(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 5.
10
Impact of a trap-neuter-return event on the size of free-roaming cat colonies around barns and stables in Quebec: A randomized controlled trial.诱捕-绝育-放归活动对魁北克谷仓和马厩周围自由放养猫群规模的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Vet Res. 2018 Jul;82(3):192-197.

引用本文的文献

1
Domestic cat management in the UK: learnings from a global perspective.英国的家猫管理:从全球视角获得的经验教训。
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Jul 22;12:1610123. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1610123. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term effect of neutering age on body condition score and bodyweight in domestic cats.绝育年龄对家猫身体状况评分和体重的长期影响。
Vet Rec. 2025 Jun 21;196(12):e5433. doi: 10.1002/vetr.5433. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
Urban Cat Management in Australia-Evidence-Based Strategies for Success.澳大利亚城市猫的管理——成功的循证策略

本文引用的文献

1
Seroprevalence of feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukaemia virus in Australia: risk factors for infection and geographical influences (2011-2013).澳大利亚猫免疫缺陷病毒和猫白血病病毒的血清流行率:感染风险因素及地理影响(2011 - 2013年)
JFMS Open Rep. 2016 May 5;2(1):2055116916646388. doi: 10.1177/2055116916646388. eCollection 2016 Jan-Jun.
2
Reasons People Surrender Unowned and Owned Cats to Australian Animal Shelters and Barriers to Assuming Ownership of Unowned Cats.人们将无主猫和自家猫送到澳大利亚动物收容所的原因以及领养无主猫的障碍。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):303-19. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1141682. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;15(8):1083. doi: 10.3390/ani15081083.
4
Rethinking Urban Cat Management-Limitations and Unintended Consequences of Traditional Cat Management.重新思考城市猫管理——传统猫管理的局限性及意外后果
Animals (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(7):1005. doi: 10.3390/ani15071005.
5
The Wildcat That Lives in Me: A Review on Free-Roaming Cats () in Brazil, Focusing on Research Priorities, Management, and Their Impacts on Cat Welfare.我心中的野猫:关于巴西自由放养猫的综述,重点关注研究重点、管理及其对猫福利的影响
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jan 12;15(2):190. doi: 10.3390/ani15020190.
6
Outcomes of a Community Cat Program Based on Sterilization of Owned, Semi-Owned and Unowned Cats in a Small Rural Town.基于对一个小乡村镇中自有、半自有和无主猫进行绝育的社区猫计划的成果。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 23;14(21):3058. doi: 10.3390/ani14213058.
7
A Situational Analysis of Attitudes toward Stray Cats and Preferences and Priorities for Their Management.对流浪猫态度及管理偏好与优先事项的情境分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(20):2953. doi: 10.3390/ani14202953.
8
Situational Analysis of Cat Ownership and Cat Caring Behaviors in a Community with High Shelter Admissions of Cats.猫咪收容率高的社区中养猫情况及养猫行为的情境分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;14(19):2849. doi: 10.3390/ani14192849.
9
Evaluation of Population Management Based on Trap-Neuter-Return and Trap-Neuter-Adoption Practices in a Free-Roaming Cat Colony in the Federal District, Brazil.基于诱捕-绝育-放归和诱捕-绝育-领养措施对巴西联邦区一个自由放养猫群进行种群管理的评估。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;14(17):2478. doi: 10.3390/ani14172478.
10
Realities, perceptions, and strategies for implementation of an ethical population management program for dogs and cats on university campuses.大学校园犬猫伦理种群管理计划实施的现实情况、认知及策略
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jul 24;11:1408795. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408795. eCollection 2024.
Feeders of Free-Roaming Cats: Personal Characteristics, Feeding Practices, and Data on Cat Health and Welfare in an Urban Setting of Israel.
以色列城市中自由放养猫的喂养者:个人特征、喂养习惯以及猫的健康和福利数据。
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Mar 7;3:21. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00021. eCollection 2016.
4
Cat Ownership Perception and Caretaking Explored in an Internet Survey of People Associated with Cats.在一项针对养猫人群的网络调查中对猫主人认知与照料情况的探究
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 28;10(7):e0133293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133293. eCollection 2015.
5
Simulating free-roaming cat population management options in open demographic environments.在开放人口环境中模拟自由放养猫的种群管理方案。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 26;9(11):e113553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113553. eCollection 2014.
6
Effect of high-impact targeted trap-neuter-return and adoption of community cats on cat intake to a shelter.高强度针对性诱捕-绝育-放归及收养社区猫对收容所猫只收容量的影响
Vet J. 2014 Sep;201(3):269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 5.
7
Evaluation of animal control measures on pet demographics in Santa Clara County, California, 1993-2006.1993-2006 年加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县宠物人口统计学中动物控制措施的评估。
PeerJ. 2013 Feb 19;1:e18. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18. Print 2013.
8
Cat admissions to RSPCA shelters in Queensland, Australia: description of cats and risk factors for euthanasia after entry.澳大利亚昆士兰州皇家防止虐待动物协会收容所接收的猫:猫的描述及入院后实施安乐死的风险因素。
Aust Vet J. 2013 Jan-Feb;91(1-2):35-42. doi: 10.1111/avj.12013. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Demographic differences between urban feeding groups of neutered and sexually intact free-roaming cats following a trap-neuter-return procedure.诱捕-绝育-放归程序后,绝育和未绝育的城市散养猫群之间的人口统计学差异。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011 May 1;238(9):1134-40. doi: 10.2460/javma.238.9.1134.
10
Euthanasia-related strain and coping strategies in animal shelter employees.动物收容所工作人员中与安乐死相关的压力及应对策略。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009 Jul 1;235(1):83-8. doi: 10.2460/javma.235.1.83.