Rand Jacquie, Scotney Rebekah, Enright Ann, Hayward Andrea, Bennett Pauleen, Morton John
Australian Pet Welfare Foundation, Kenmore, QLD 4069, Australia.
Faculty of Science, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, QLD 4343, Australia.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(20):2953. doi: 10.3390/ani14202953.
Current cat management approaches are outdated and ineffective, failing to reduce stray cat numbers or related complaints and negatively impacting the job satisfaction and mental health of veterinary, shelter, and municipal staff. We undertook a situational analysis prior to implementing a Community Cat Program based on free sterilization of owned, semi-owned, and unowned cats in the city of Ipswich, Queensland, Australia. The study involved 343 residents in three suburbs in Ipswich, Queensland, Australia with high per capita intake of cats into the receiving shelter and municipal pound. We investigated the prevalence and impacts of free-roaming cats in urban areas, focusing on sightings, associated issues, and community preferences for cat management. Stray cats were observed by many respondents (71%), primarily at private residences (52%) and in alleyways or streets (22%), which caused serious or moderately serious problems for 38% of those who saw stray or wandering cats. Key concerns included the killing of native birds (38%) and animals (35%), noise (33%), and soiling (32%). Actions taken by respondents who saw stray or wandering cats included chasing them away or using deterrents (25%), capturing the cat for removal or calling council (18%) and preventing home entry (14%). Respondents' priorities for the local government management of cats included preventing kittens from being born (94% of respondents) and stopping cats from preying on native animals (91%); reducing disease spread to pets (89%), wildlife (89%), and humans (87%); decreasing stray cat numbers (75%); and preventing cat fights (70%). Respondents favored sterilization (65%) over euthanasia (35%), aligning with the results of previous research. Cat ownership and feeding unowned cats were predictors of management preferences. Only 29% of respondents were satisfied with the current local council management of the problem. Information on the benefits of management by sterilization could further enhance community support.
当前对猫的管理方法已经过时且无效,未能减少流浪猫数量或相关投诉,还对兽医、收容所及市政工作人员的工作满意度和心理健康产生了负面影响。在澳大利亚昆士兰州伊普斯维奇市实施一项基于对所有、半所有及无主猫进行免费绝育的社区猫管理计划之前,我们进行了一次情况分析。该研究涉及澳大利亚昆士兰州伊普斯维奇市三个郊区的343名居民,这些郊区的动物收容所和市政动物收容所的人均猫收容量较高。我们调查了城市中自由放养的猫的流行情况及其影响,重点关注目击情况、相关问题以及社区对猫管理的偏好。许多受访者(71%)观察到了流浪猫,主要出现在私人住宅(52%)以及小巷或街道(22%),对于38%看到流浪或游荡猫的人来说,这造成了严重或较为严重的问题。主要担忧包括本地鸟类(38%)和动物(35%)被猎杀、噪音(33%)以及粪便污染(32%)。看到流浪或游荡猫的受访者所采取的行动包括赶走它们或使用威慑手段(25%)、捕捉猫以便带走或联系市政当局(18%)以及阻止猫进入家中(14%)。受访者对地方政府管理猫的首要任务包括防止小猫出生(94%的受访者)以及阻止猫捕食本地动物(91%);减少疾病传播给宠物(89%)、野生动物(89%)和人类(87%);减少流浪猫数量(75%);以及防止猫打架(70%)。与之前的研究结果一致,受访者更倾向于绝育(65%)而非安乐死(35%)。养猫和喂养无主猫是管理偏好的预测因素。只有29%的受访者对当地议会目前对该问题的管理感到满意。关于绝育管理益处的信息可以进一步增强社区的支持。