Johns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
US Medical Affairs, Bayer HealthCare, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):572-581. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25774. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
To compare the performance of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with 1M gadobutrol, a high relaxivity macrocyclic contrast agent, to 2D time-of-flight MRA (ToF-MRA) using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as the standard of reference. Primary objectives were evaluation for superiority of structural delineation and noninferiority for detection and exclusion of clinically significant disease.
In all, 315 subjects underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MRA with 1M gadobutrol (CE-MRA) and were scanned with 1.5T MRI equipped with an at least 6-element body coil. Evaluations were based on both centralized blinded read (BR) performed by six readers as well as investigator site interpretations for the 292 subjects who completed the study. Quantitative evaluations including percent stenosis and normal vessel measurements were also performed. Secondary endpoints included identification of accessory renal arteries, diagnosis of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), diagnostic confidence, and need for additional imaging.
A total of 292 patients suspected of renal artery disease completed the study. CE-MRA demonstrated statistically significant improvement in assessability of vascular segments compared to ToF: 95.9% vs. 77.6% (P < 0.0001). In the BR, the sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRA were noninferior to ToF-MRA (53.4% vs. 46.6% and 95.1% vs. 85.7%, respectively). There was less error in the CE-MRA stenosis measurements (0.15 mm gadobutrol vs. 0.41 mm ToF, P < 0.05). FMD was correctly diagnosed more frequently, 10% more accessory renal arteries were identified (P < 0.01), diagnostic confidence increased (P < 0.01), and fewer additional imaging studies were recommended (P < 0.01).
Gadobutrol-enhanced MRA of the renal arteries has superior visualization, more accurate vessel measurements, and may serve as a CTA alternative without any ionizing radiation.
1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:572-581.
比较使用高弛豫率大环对比剂 1M 钆布醇的磁共振血管造影(MRA)与二维时间飞跃 MRA(TOF-MRA)的性能,以计算机断层血管造影(CTA)为参考标准。主要目的是评估结构描绘的优越性和检测及排除临床显著疾病的非劣效性。
共 315 例患者行钆布醇(CE-MRA)增强和非增强 MRA 检查,并使用配备至少 6 个体线圈的 1.5T MRI 进行扫描。基于 6 位读者的中心盲法读片(BR)评估和 292 例完成研究的患者的研究者站点解读进行评估。还进行了包括狭窄百分比和正常血管测量的定量评估。次要终点包括识别副肾动脉、纤维肌性发育不良(FMD)的诊断、诊断信心和对额外成像的需求。
共 292 例疑似肾动脉疾病的患者完成了研究。CE-MRA 与 TOF 相比,血管节段的可评估性有统计学显著改善:95.9% vs. 77.6%(P<0.0001)。在 BR 中,CE-MRA 的敏感性和特异性与 TOF-MRA 相当(53.4% vs. 46.6%和 95.1% vs. 85.7%)。CE-MRA 的狭窄测量误差较小(0.15mm 钆布醇 vs. 0.41mm TOF,P<0.05)。FMD 的诊断更准确,多发现 10%的副肾动脉(P<0.01),诊断信心增加(P<0.01),推荐的额外成像检查更少(P<0.01)。
肾动脉钆布醇增强 MRA 具有更好的可视化效果,更准确的血管测量,可作为 CTA 的替代方法,且无电离辐射。
成像 2018;47:572-581。