Suppr超能文献

抗菌药物管理项目进行即时β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏皮肤点刺试验:一项实用的多中心前瞻性评估。

Point-of-Care β-Lactam Allergy Skin Testing by Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Pragmatic Multicenter Prospective Evaluation.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine.

Sunnybrook Research Institute and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Oct 1;65(7):1059-1065. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix512.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

β-lactam allergy skin testing (BLAST) is recommended by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) guidelines, yet few studies have systematically evaluated its impact when delivered at point of care.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic multicenter prospective evaluation of the use of point-of-care BLAST by ASPs. In staggered 3-month intervals, ASP teams at 3 hospitals received training by allergists to offer BLAST for eligible patients with infectious diseases receiving nonpreferred therapy due to severity of their reported allergy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving the preferred β-lactam therapy.

RESULTS

Of 827 patients with reported β-lactam allergy over 15 months, β-lactam therapy was preferred among 632 (76%). During baseline periods, 50% (124/246) received preferred β-lactam therapy based on history, compared with 60% (232/386) during the intervention periods (P = .02), which improved further to 81% (313/386) upon provision of BLAST (P < .001) without any increase in incidence of adverse drug reactions (4% vs 3%; P = .4). After adjusting for patient variables and the correlation between hospitals, the intervention period was associated with a 4.5-fold greater odds of receiving preferred β-lactam therapy (95% confidence interval, 2.4-8.2; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BLAST at the point of care across 3 hospital ASPs resulted in greater use of preferred β-lactam therapy without increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions. Longer-term studies are needed to better assess the safety and clinical impact of this ASP intervention.

摘要

背景

抗菌药物管理项目 (ASP) 指南推荐进行β-内酰胺类过敏皮肤试验 (BLAST),但很少有研究系统评估在护理点实施时的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项实用的多中心前瞻性评估,评估 ASP 对护理点 BLAST 的使用。在 3 家医院的 ASP 团队分 3 个 3 个月的阶段,由过敏专家进行培训,为因报告的过敏严重程度而接受非首选治疗的传染病患者提供 BLAST。主要结局是接受首选β-内酰胺治疗的患者比例。

结果

在 15 个月内,共有 827 名报告有β-内酰胺过敏的患者,其中 632 名(76%)β-内酰胺治疗为首选。在基线期,根据病史,有 50%(124/246)接受了首选β-内酰胺治疗,而在干预期为 60%(232/386)(P=0.02),在提供 BLAST 后进一步提高到 81%(313/386)(P<0.001),而药物不良反应发生率无增加(4%比 3%;P=0.4)。在校正患者变量和医院间的相关性后,干预期与接受首选β-内酰胺治疗的几率增加 4.5 倍相关(95%置信区间,2.4-8.2;P<0.0001)。

结论

在 3 家医院的 ASP 中,在护理点使用 BLAST 可增加首选β-内酰胺治疗的应用,而不增加药物不良反应的风险。需要进行更长期的研究,以更好地评估该 ASP 干预措施的安全性和临床影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验