Craig Jessica, Sriram Aditi, Sadoff Rachel, Bennett Sarah, Bahati Felix, Beauvais Wendy
Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
One Health Trust, Bangalore, India.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 8;3(5):e0001526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001526. eCollection 2023.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an economic, food security, and global health threat accelerated by a multitude of factors including the overuse and misuse of antimicrobials in the human health, animal health, and agriculture sectors. Given the rapid emergence and spread of AMR and the relative lack of development of new antimicrobials or alternative therapies, there is a need to develop and implement non-pharmaceutical AMR mitigation policies and interventions that improve antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) practices across all sectors where antimicrobials are used. We conducted a systematic literature review per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify peer-reviewed studies that described behavior-change interventions that aimed to improve AMS and/or reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) among human health, animal health, and livestock agriculture stakeholders. We identified 301 total publications- 11 in the animal health sector and 290 in the human health sector-and assessed described interventions using metrics across five thematic areas- (1) AMU, (2) adherence to clinical guidelines, (3) AMS, (4) AMR, and (5) clinical outcomes. The lack of studies describing the animal health sector precluded a meta-analysis. Variation across intervention type, study type, and outcome precluded a meta-analysis for studies describing the human health sector; however, a summary descriptive analysis was conducted. Among studies in the human health sector, 35.7% reported significant (p<0.05) pre- to post-intervention decreases in AMU, 73.7% reported significant improvements in adherence of antimicrobial therapies to clinical guidelines, 45% demonstrated significant improvements in AMS practices, 45.5% reported significant decreases in the proportion of isolates that were resistant to antibiotics or the proportion of patients with drug-resistant infections across 17 antimicrobial-organism combinations. Few studies reported significant changes in clinical outcomes. We did not identify any overarching intervention type nor characteristics associated with successful improvement in AMS, AMR, AMU, adherence, nor clinical outcomes.
抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)是一种经济、粮食安全和全球健康威胁,多种因素加速了这一威胁,包括在人类健康、动物健康和农业领域过度使用和滥用抗菌药物。鉴于AMR的迅速出现和传播以及新抗菌药物或替代疗法的开发相对不足,有必要制定和实施非药物性的AMR缓解政策和干预措施,以改善在所有使用抗菌药物的部门的抗菌药物管理(AMS)做法。我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行了一项系统文献综述,以确定同行评审的研究,这些研究描述了旨在改善AMS和/或减少人类健康、动物健康和畜牧农业利益相关者中不当抗菌药物使用(AMU)的行为改变干预措施。我们共确定了301篇出版物——动物健康领域11篇,人类健康领域290篇——并使用五个主题领域的指标评估所描述的干预措施:(1)AMU,(2)对临床指南的依从性,(3)AMS,(4)AMR,以及(5)临床结果。缺乏描述动物健康领域的研究使得无法进行Meta分析。干预类型、研究类型和结果的差异使得无法对描述人类健康领域的研究进行Meta分析;然而,进行了一项汇总描述性分析。在人类健康领域的研究中,35.7%报告干预前后AMU有显著(p<0.05)下降,73.7%报告抗菌治疗对临床指南的依从性有显著改善,45%表明AMS做法有显著改善。45.5%报告在17种抗菌药物-微生物组合中,对抗生素耐药的分离株比例或耐药感染患者比例有显著下降。很少有研究报告临床结果有显著变化。我们没有确定任何与AMS、AMR、AMU、依从性或临床结果的成功改善相关的总体干预类型或特征。