Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 410128, China.
School of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Plant Cell Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;58(8):1391-1404. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx072.
Carbon reserves in rice straw (stem and sheath) before flowering contribute to a significant portion of grain filling. However, the molecular mechanism of carbon reserve remobilization from straw to grains remains unclear. In this study, super rice LYP9 and conventional rice 9311 showed different carbon reserve remobilization behaviors. The transcriptomic profiles of straws of LYP9 and 9311 were analyzed at three stages of grain filling. Among the differentially expressed genes (DGs), 5,733 genes were uniquely up- or down-regulated at 30 days after anthesis (DAA) between LYP9 and 9311 in comparison with 681 at 10 DAA and 495 at 20 DAA, suggesting that the gene expression profile of LYP9 was very different from that of 9311 at the late stage of grain filling. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis and Gene Ontology (GO) classification of DGs both showed that the carbohydrate catabolic pathway, plant hormone signal transduction and photosynthesis pathway were enriched in DGs, suggesting their roles in carbon reserve remobilization, which explains to a certain extent the difference in non-structural carbohydrate content, photosynthesis and ABA content between the two cultivars during grain filling. Further comparative analysis and confirmation by quantitative real-time PCR and enzyme assays suggest that genes involved in trehalose synthesis (trehalose-phosphate phosphatase and trehalose 6-phosphate synthase/phosphatase), starch degradation (β-amylase) and sucrose synthesis (sucrose-phosphate synthase and sucrose synthase) were important for carbon reserve remobilization, whereas ABA content was determined by the counteraction of NCED1 and ABA8ox1 genes. The higher expression level of all these genes and ABA content in 9311 resulted in better efficiency of carbon reserve remobilization in 9311 than in LYP9.
开花前水稻秸秆(茎和叶鞘)中的碳储备对籽粒灌浆有重要贡献。然而,秸秆中的碳储备向籽粒再转移的分子机制仍不清楚。在这项研究中,超级稻 LYP9 和常规稻 9311 表现出不同的碳储备再转移行为。在灌浆的三个阶段分析了 LYP9 和 9311 秸秆的转录组谱。在 LYP9 和 9311 之间,与 10 DAA 时的 681 个和 20 DAA 时的 495 个相比,有 5733 个基因在授粉后 30 天(30 DAA)时差异表达(DEGs),这表明 LYP9 的基因表达谱在灌浆后期与 9311 非常不同。京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)分析和基因本体论(GO)对 DEGs 的分类均表明,碳水化合物分解代谢途径、植物激素信号转导和光合作用途径在 DEGs 中富集,表明它们在碳储备再转移中的作用,这在一定程度上解释了两个品种在灌浆过程中非结构性碳水化合物含量、光合作用和 ABA 含量的差异。进一步的比较分析和通过定量实时 PCR 和酶分析的验证表明,参与海藻糖合成(海藻糖-6-磷酸磷酸酶和海藻糖 6-磷酸合酶/磷酸酶)、淀粉降解(β-淀粉酶)和蔗糖合成(蔗糖-磷酸合酶和蔗糖合酶)的基因对碳储备再转移很重要,而 ABA 含量由 NCED1 和 ABA8ox1 基因的拮抗作用决定。9311 中所有这些基因和 ABA 含量的较高表达水平导致 9311 中碳储备再转移效率优于 LYP9。