Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard T. H, Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Sep;70(9):1400-1405. doi: 10.1002/acr.23302. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Nonadherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is common, worsens during the treatment course, and results in adverse outcomes. We studied whether patient navigators (laypersons trained in care coordination, motivational interviewing, basic pharmacology, and disease management) improved oral DMARD adherence.
We enrolled 107 patients ages ≥18 years with systemic rheumatic diseases who initiated an oral DMARD within 6 months. Navigators interacted with patients up to 2-4 times per week for 6 months. Patients completed validated surveys (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale [MMAS-8], Mental Health Inventory [MHI-5], Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire) at baseline and at 6 months. We used paired t-tests to compare baseline and 6-month outcomes. We examined the association of age, race/ethnicity, insurance, and MHI-5 with change in MMAS-8 score using multivariable linear regression.
Among 107 patients enrolled, 69 (64%) completed baseline and 6-month MMAS-8 surveys. Mean ± SD age was 55 ± 16 years and 93% were female. The mean ± SD baseline MMAS-8 score was 6.7 ± 1.3 (indicating borderline adherence), and the mean ± SD MHI-5 score was 60.8 ± 9.1 (<68 suggests any depressive symptoms). After 6 months, there were no significant changes in MMAS-8 (P = 0.09) or MHI-5 (P = 0.83). Patients described fewer medication concerns (P = 0.03), but a more threatening perception of illness (P = 0.01). Our multivariable model demonstrated a small change in MMAS-8 for each 5-year increase in age (β = 0.14, P = 0.02).
Our intervention resulted in no significant change in adherence from baseline. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial is needed to determine whether patient navigators are effective in maintaining adherence to DMARDs over time.
不遵守疾病修正抗风湿药物(DMARDs)是常见的,在治疗过程中会恶化,并导致不良后果。我们研究了患者导航员(在护理协调、动机访谈、基础药理学和疾病管理方面受过培训的非专业人士)是否能提高口服 DMARD 的依从性。
我们招募了 107 名年龄≥18 岁的患有系统性风湿性疾病的患者,他们在 6 个月内开始服用口服 DMARD。导航员每周与患者互动 2-4 次,持续 6 个月。患者在基线和 6 个月时完成了经过验证的调查(Morisky 药物依从性量表[MMAS-8]、心理健康量表[MHI-5]、药物信念问卷和简要疾病感知问卷)。我们使用配对 t 检验比较基线和 6 个月的结果。我们使用多元线性回归分析年龄、种族/族裔、保险和 MHI-5 与 MMAS-8 评分变化的关系。
在 107 名入组患者中,有 69 名(64%)完成了基线和 6 个月的 MMAS-8 调查。平均年龄±标准差为 55±16 岁,93%为女性。基线 MMAS-8 评分的平均值±标准差为 6.7±1.3(表明边界依从性),MHI-5 评分的平均值±标准差为 60.8±9.1(<68 表示有任何抑郁症状)。6 个月后,MMAS-8 评分无显著变化(P=0.09)或 MHI-5 评分无显著变化(P=0.83)。患者描述的药物担忧减少(P=0.03),但对疾病的威胁感知增加(P=0.01)。我们的多元模型显示,年龄每增加 5 岁,MMAS-8 评分就会有微小的变化(β=0.14,P=0.02)。
我们的干预措施并没有使依从性从基线显著改善。需要进行一项多中心、随机对照试验,以确定患者导航员是否能有效地随着时间的推移维持 DMARD 的依从性。