Traxl Alexander, Beikbaghban Taraneh, Wanek Thomas, Kryeziu Kushtrim, Pirker Christine, Mairinger Severin, Stanek Johann, Filip Thomas, Sauberer Michael, Kuntner Claudia, Berger Walter, Langer Oliver
Biomedical Systems, Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Seibersdorf, Austria.
Institute of Cancer Research and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nucl Med Biol. 2017 Sep;52:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 25.
[C]Erlotinib PET has shown promise to distinguish non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors harboring the activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation delE746-A750 from tumors with wild-type EGFR. To assess the suitability of [C]erlotinib PET to detect the emergence of acquired erlotinib resistance in initially erlotinib-responsive tumors, we performed in vitro binding and PET experiments in mice bearing tumor xenografts using a range of different cancer cells, which were erlotinib-sensitive or exhibited clinically relevant resistance mechanisms to erlotinib.
The following cell lines were used for in vitro binding and PET experiments: the epidermoid carcinoma cell line A-431 (erlotinib-sensitive, wild-type EGFR) and the three NSCLC cell lines HCC827 (erlotinib-sensitive, delE746-A750), HCC827 (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and T790M) and HCC827 (erlotinib-resistant, delE746-A750 and MET amplification). BALB/c nude mice with subcutaneous tumor xenografts underwent two consecutive [C]erlotinib PET scans, a baseline scan and a second scan in which unlabeled erlotinib (10mg/kg) was co-injected. Logan graphical analysis was used to estimate total distribution volume (V) of [C]erlotinib in tumors.
In vitro experiments revealed significantly higher uptake of [C]erlotinib (5.2-fold) in the three NSCLC cell lines as compared to A-431 cells. In all four cell lines co-incubation with unlabeled erlotinib (1μM) led to significant reductions in [C]erlotinib uptake (-19% to -66%). In both PET scans and for all four studied cell lines there were no significant differences in tumoral [C]erlotinib V values. For all three NSCLC cell lines, but not for the A-431 cell line, tumoral V was significantly reduced following co-injection of unlabeled erlotinib (-20% to -35%).
We found no significant differences in the in vitro and in vivo binding of [C]erlotinib between erlotinib-sensitive and erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells. Our findings suggest that [C]erlotinib PET will not be suitable to distinguish erlotinib-sensitive NSCLC tumors from tumors with acquired resistance to erlotinib.
[C]厄洛替尼正电子发射断层扫描(PET)已显示出有望区分携带激活型表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变delE746 - A750的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)肿瘤与野生型EGFR肿瘤。为了评估[C]厄洛替尼PET在检测初始对厄洛替尼敏感的肿瘤中获得性厄洛替尼耐药性出现方面的适用性,我们使用一系列对厄洛替尼敏感或表现出与临床相关的厄洛替尼耐药机制的不同癌细胞,在荷瘤异种移植小鼠中进行了体外结合和PET实验。
以下细胞系用于体外结合和PET实验:表皮样癌细胞系A - 431(对厄洛替尼敏感,野生型EGFR)以及三种NSCLC细胞系HCC827(对厄洛替尼敏感,delE746 - A750)、HCC827(对厄洛替尼耐药,delE746 - A750和T790M)和HCC827(对厄洛替尼耐药,delE746 - A750和MET扩增)。对皮下接种肿瘤异种移植物的BALB/c裸鼠进行连续两次[C]厄洛替尼PET扫描,一次基线扫描和一次在注射未标记厄洛替尼(10mg/kg)的同时进行的第二次扫描。使用洛根图分析来估计[C]厄洛替尼在肿瘤中的总分布容积(V)。
体外实验显示,与A - 431细胞相比,三种NSCLC细胞系中[C]厄洛替尼的摄取显著更高(5.2倍)。在所有四种细胞系中,与未标记的厄洛替尼(1μM)共同孵育导致[C]厄洛替尼摄取显著降低(-19%至-66%)。在两次PET扫描中以及对于所有四种研究的细胞系,肿瘤中[C]厄洛替尼的V值均无显著差异。对于所有三种NSCLC细胞系,但不包括A - 431细胞系,注射未标记的厄洛替尼后肿瘤V值显著降低(-20%至-35%)。
我们发现对厄洛替尼敏感和耐药的NSCLC细胞之间,[C]厄洛替尼的体外和体内结合无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,[C]厄洛替尼PET不适用于区分对厄洛替尼敏感的NSCLC肿瘤与对厄洛替尼获得性耐药的肿瘤。