Schuhmayer Nicole, Weber Corinna, Kieler Markus, Voller Bernhard, Pirker Walter, Auff Eduard, Haubenberger Dietrich
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Clinical Trials Unit, Office of the Clinical Director, NINDS Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg 10, Rm 6-5700, Bethesda 20892, MD, USA.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Aug;41:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 20.
In Essential Tremor (ET), tremor characteristics and the impairment caused by tremor may vary from task to task. A variability of tremor frequency between postural and kinetic tasks has been proposed in ET, suggesting either multiple central oscillating networks, or peripheral or proprioceptive feedback-mechanisms. This electrophysiological study aimed to assess tremor frequencies and amplitudes in tasks involving postural and kinetic tremor, and compare findings within and across tasks, to delineate physiological differences underlying individually affected manual tasks in ET.
40 ET patients were included in the study. Tremor was characterized clinically, as well as electrophysiologically using accelerometry and digitizing tablet tasks. Tremor amplitude measures and frequencies were extracted for tasks involving kinetic (digital spiral drawing, handwriting), as well as postural tremor. Tremor was compared between and within tasks.
Digital spiral tremor frequencies were significantly higher compared to postural tremor frequencies, as measured by accelerometry, with a mean difference of >2 Hz (p < 0.001). Within-task variability of repeated digital spirals revealed a significant amplitude reduction over time in both hands (p < 0.001), with an up to 32% reduction compared to the first spiral.
ET exhibited a frequency variability, which was dependent on activation condition, suggesting neurophysiologically distinct pathways between postural and kinetic tremor. The reduction of tremor amplitudes observed in repeated digital spiral drawing may be explained by a learning effect or adaptation, and should be considered as non-random factor of variability when using spirals in ET to assess effects of interventions.
在特发性震颤(ET)中,震颤特征以及震颤所导致的功能损害可能因任务不同而有所差异。ET中已有人提出姿势性任务和运动性任务之间的震颤频率存在变异性,这表明可能存在多个中枢振荡网络,或者外周或本体感觉反馈机制。这项电生理研究旨在评估涉及姿势性和运动性震颤的任务中的震颤频率和幅度,并比较任务内和任务间的结果,以阐明ET中个体受影响的手动任务背后的生理差异。
40名ET患者纳入本研究。通过临床以及使用加速度计和数字化平板任务进行电生理特征描述。提取涉及运动性(数字螺旋线绘制、书写)以及姿势性震颤任务的震颤幅度测量值和频率。对任务间和任务内的震颤进行比较。
通过加速度计测量,数字螺旋线震颤频率显著高于姿势性震颤频率,平均差异>2Hz(p<0.001)。重复数字螺旋线任务内的变异性显示,双手震颤幅度随时间显著降低(p<0.001),与第一个螺旋线相比降低幅度高达32%。
ET表现出频率变异性,这取决于激活条件,提示姿势性和运动性震颤之间存在神经生理学上不同的通路。在重复数字螺旋线绘制中观察到的震颤幅度降低可能是由于学习效应或适应性,并且在使用螺旋线评估ET干预效果时应将其视为变异性的非随机因素。