• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reimagining Childhood: Responding to the Challenge Presented by Severe Developmental Disability.

作者信息

Salter Erica K

机构信息

Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):241-256. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9331-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-017-9331-6
PMID:28577266
Abstract

Through an exploration of the experience of severe and profound intellectual disability, this essay will attempt to expose the predominant, yet usually obscured, medical anthropology of the child and examine its effects on pediatric bioethics. I will argue that both modern western society and modern western medicine do, actually, have a robust notion of the child, a notion which can find its roots in three influential thinkers: Aristotle, Immanuel Kant and Jean Piaget. Together, these philosophers offer us a compelling vision: the child is primarily a future rational, autonomous adult. While this tacit understanding has arguably widespread effects on such things as our concept of good parenting, of proper schooling, and so on, I will focus on the effect is has on the treatment of children with severe developmental disabilities. When examined in light of this population, the dominant medical anthropology of the child will be shown to be deficient. Instead, I argue for an expansion-indeed, a full reimagining-of our notions of childhood, not only to re-infuse dignity into the lives of children with SDD, but to better represent the goods of childhood, generally.

摘要

相似文献

1
Reimagining Childhood: Responding to the Challenge Presented by Severe Developmental Disability.
HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):241-256. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9331-6.
2
Seizure disorders and developmental disorders: impact on life of affected families-a structured interview.癫痫症与发育障碍:对受影响家庭生活的影响——一项结构化访谈
Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Aug;176(8):1121-1129. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2958-0. Epub 2017 Jul 9.
3
The Ashley Treatment: furthering the anthropology of/on disability.阿什利治疗法:推进残疾人类学研究
Med Anthropol. 2008 Jul-Sep;27(3):219-26. doi: 10.1080/01459740802222690.
4
Parental reasoning about growth attenuation therapy: report of a single-case study.父母对生长减缓疗法的推理:一项单病例研究报告。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep;41(9):745-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101913. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Introduction: Childhood and Disability.引言:童年与残疾
HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):191-196. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9330-7.
6
Revisiting the relevance of the social model of disability.重新审视残疾社会模式的相关性。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jan;10(1):54-5. doi: 10.1080/15265160903460913.
7
Family quality of life of Australian families with a member with an intellectual/developmental disability.澳大利亚有智力/发育障碍成员家庭的生活质量。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Jan;56(1):71-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01462.x. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Ashley X.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;86(12):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815b77b2.
9
Mothers of children with developmental disabilities: stress in early and middle childhood.发育障碍儿童的母亲:幼儿期和儿童中期的压力。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3449-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
10
An initial look at the quality of life of Malaysian families that include children with disabilities.初步观察马来西亚有残疾儿童的家庭的生活质量。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Jan;56(1):45-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01408.x. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction: Childhood and Disability.引言:童年与残疾
HEC Forum. 2017 Sep;29(3):191-196. doi: 10.1007/s10730-017-9330-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice.知情同意在儿科实践中的决策制定。
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1485.
2
Achieving Quality Health Services for Adolescents.实现青少年优质卫生服务。
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1347. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Reconceptualizing Autonomy: A Relational Turn in Bioethics.重新概念化自主性:生物伦理学的关系转向。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2016 May;46(3):11-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.544. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Patient- and family-centered care coordination: a framework for integrating care for children and youth across multiple systems.患者和家庭为中心的医疗协调:整合多系统儿童和青少年医疗服务的框架。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1451-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0318.
5
Resisting the siren call of individualism in pediatric decision-making and the role of relational interests.抵制儿科决策中个人主义的诱惑性召唤以及关系利益的作用。
J Med Philos. 2014 Feb;39(1):26-40. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht060. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Uncertainty--the other side of prognosis.不确定性——预后的另一面。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 27;368(26):2448-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1303295.
7
How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others.婴儿和幼儿对反社会者的反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19931-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110306108. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008.美国儿童发育障碍患病率的趋势,1997-2008 年。
Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):1034-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2989. Epub 2011 May 23.
9
Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations.三个月大的婴儿在社会评价中表现出消极偏见。
Dev Sci. 2010 Nov;13(6):923-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.x.
10
The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions.最佳利益标准不适用于新生儿复苏决策。
Pediatrics. 2008 May;121(5):963-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1520.