Mosley Emma, Laborde Sylvain, Kavanagh Emma
Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK; Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
German Sport University, Cologne, Germany; University of Caen, Caen, France.
Physiol Behav. 2017 Oct 1;179:116-125. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 May 31.
The aims of this study were 1) to assess the predictive role of coping related variables (CRV) on cardiac vagal activity (derived from heart rate variability), and 2) to investigate the influence of CRV (including cardiac vagal activity) on a dart throwing task under low pressure (LP) and high pressure (HP) conditions. Participants (n=51) completed trait CRV questionnaires: Decision Specific Reinvestment Scale, Movement Specific Reinvestment Scale and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire. They competed in a dart throwing task under LP and HP conditions. Cardiac vagal activity measurements were taken at resting, task and during recovery for 5min. Self-reported ratings of stress were recorded at three time points via a visual analogue scale. Upon completion of the task, self-report measures of motivation, stress appraisal, attention, perceived pressure and dart throwing experience were completed. Results indicated that resting cardiac vagal activity had no predictors. Task cardiac vagal activity was predicted by resting cardiac vagal activity in both pressure conditions with the addition of a trait CRV in HP. Post task cardiac vagal activity was predicted by resting cardiac vagal activity in both conditions with the addition of a trait CRV in HP. Cardiac vagal reactivity (difference from resting to task) was predicted by a trait CRV in HP conditions. Cardiac vagal recovery (difference from task to post task) was predicted by a state CRV only in LP. Dart throwing task performance was predicted by a combination of both CRV and cardiac vagal activity. The current research suggests that coping related variables and cardiac vagal activity influence dart throwing task performance differently dependent on pressure condition.
本研究的目的是:1)评估应对相关变量(CRV)对心脏迷走神经活动(由心率变异性得出)的预测作用;2)研究CRV(包括心脏迷走神经活动)在低压(LP)和高压(HP)条件下对飞镖投掷任务的影响。参与者(n = 51)完成了特质CRV问卷:决策特定再投资量表、运动特定再投资量表和特质情商问卷。他们在LP和HP条件下进行了飞镖投掷任务。在休息、任务期间和恢复5分钟时测量心脏迷走神经活动。通过视觉模拟量表在三个时间点记录自我报告的压力评分。任务完成后,完成了动机、压力评估、注意力、感知压力和飞镖投掷经验的自我报告测量。结果表明,静息心脏迷走神经活动没有预测因素。在两种压力条件下,任务心脏迷走神经活动都由静息心脏迷走神经活动预测,在HP条件下还增加了一个特质CRV。在两种条件下,任务后心脏迷走神经活动都由静息心脏迷走神经活动预测,在HP条件下还增加了一个特质CRV。心脏迷走神经反应性(从静息到任务的差异)在HP条件下由一个特质CRV预测。心脏迷走神经恢复(从任务到任务后的差异)仅在LP条件下由一个状态CRV预测。飞镖投掷任务表现由CRV和心脏迷走神经活动共同预测。当前研究表明,应对相关变量和心脏迷走神经活动对飞镖投掷任务表现的影响因压力条件而异。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018-11
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000-3
Biol Psychol. 2017-12
Physiol Behav. 2015-2
Psychophysiology. 2008-11
Front Psychol. 2022-8-15
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-6-20
Front Psychol. 2020-2-6