Gao Sarah J, Kim Anthony W, Puchalski Jonathan T, Bramley Kyle, Detterbeck Frank C, Boffa Daniel J, Decker Roy H
Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, United States.
University of South California, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States.
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jul;109:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S): Appropriate use of invasive mediastinal staging in patients with clinically node-negative NSCLC staged by PET-CT is critical in selecting patients for curative-intent therapy such as surgery or SBRT, but little data exists to guide this decision-making. We examined a large population of patients with clinical stage I NSCLC referred for mediastinoscopy or EBUS to find risk factors for occult N2 lymph nodes and determine which patients benefit from invasive staging.
MATERIALS/METHODS: We identified consecutive clinical T1-2N0 NSCLC patients being evaluated for curative-intent therapy between 2011 and 2015. None had evidence of nodal disease by PET-CT; the endpoint was pathologic confirmation of occult N2 disease by EBUS or mediastinoscopy. Tumor size, location, histology, SUV, and radiographic appearance were evaluated as determinants of occult N2 disease. Two group comparisons of continuous variables were done with independent t-tests and categorical variables were compared with χ or Fisher's exact test.
In 284 patients with PET-CT-staged clinical T1-2N0 disease, the prevalence of occult N2 metastases was 7.0%. The negative predictive value of PET-CT was 92.9% and the negative predictive value of mediastinoscopy/EBUS was 96.3%. T2 tumors were more likely to have occult N2 disease than T1 tumors (11.8% v 3.6% p=0.009). Pure solid tumors had greater involvement of N2 nodes than tumors with any ground glass component (12.6% v 3.1%, p<0.001). 17.5% of central tumor cases were found to have occult N2 metastases while 4.4% of patients with peripheral tumors (P<0.001). 33.3% of patients with solid central T2 tumors had occult N2 metastases whereas 2.0% of patients with peripheral T2 tumors with a ground glass component, 1.2% of patients with peripheral T1 tumors with a ground glass component and 3.6% of patients with peripheral T1 solid tumors had N2 metastases.
Invasive mediastinal staging should be strongly encouraged in central tumors and solid T2 tumors because the risk of occult nodal involvement is greater than 10% in these cohorts. However, for patients with peripheral T1 tumors or peripheral T2 tumors with a significant ground glass component, the yield of invasive staging after a negative PET-CT is very low and invasive staging may not be warranted.
对于经PET-CT分期为临床淋巴结阴性的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,合理应用侵入性纵隔分期对于选择手术或立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)等根治性治疗的患者至关重要,但几乎没有数据可指导这一决策过程。我们研究了大量因纵隔镜检查或超声支气管镜检查(EBUS)而转诊的临床I期NSCLC患者,以寻找隐匿性N2淋巴结的危险因素,并确定哪些患者能从侵入性分期中获益。
我们确定了2011年至2015年间连续接受根治性治疗评估的临床T1-2N0 NSCLC患者。PET-CT均未显示有淋巴结疾病证据;终点是通过EBUS或纵隔镜检查病理证实隐匿性N2疾病。评估肿瘤大小、位置、组织学、标准化摄取值(SUV)和影像学表现作为隐匿性N2疾病的决定因素。连续变量的两组比较采用独立t检验,分类变量采用χ²检验或Fisher精确检验。
在284例经PET-CT分期为临床T1-2N0疾病的患者中,隐匿性N2转移的发生率为7.0%。PET-CT的阴性预测值为92.9%,纵隔镜检查/EBUS的阴性预测值为96.3%。T2肿瘤比T1肿瘤更易发生隐匿性N2疾病(11.8%对3.6%,p = 0.009)。纯实性肿瘤比有任何磨玻璃成分的肿瘤有更多的N2淋巴结受累(12.6%对3.1%,p < 0.001)。17.5%的中央型肿瘤病例发现有隐匿性N2转移,而周围型肿瘤患者为4.4%(P < 0.001)。33.3%的中央型实性T2肿瘤患者有隐匿性N2转移,而周围型T2磨玻璃成分肿瘤患者为2.0%,周围型T1磨玻璃成分肿瘤患者为1.2%,周围型T1实性肿瘤患者为3.6%有N2转移。
对于中央型肿瘤和实性T2肿瘤,应强烈鼓励进行侵入性纵隔分期,因为这些队列中隐匿性淋巴结受累的风险大于10%。然而,对于周围型T1肿瘤或有显著磨玻璃成分的周围型T2肿瘤患者,PET-CT阴性后侵入性分期的检出率非常低,可能不需要进行侵入性分期。