Alt Douglas S, Doyle John W, Malladi Anish
Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, 1111 Miller Plant Sciences, Athens, GA, 30602, United Statesof America; Douglas S. Alt, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
J Plant Physiol. 2017 Sep;216:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 23.
Blueberry (Vaccinium sp.) is thought to display a preference for the ammonium (NH) form over the nitrate (NO) form of inorganic nitrogen (N). This N-source preference has been associated with a generally low capacity to assimilate the NO form of N, especially within the shoot tissues. Nitrate assimilation is mediated by nitrate reductase (NR), a rate limiting enzyme that converts NO to nitrite (NO). We investigated potential limitations of NO assimilation in two blueberry species, rabbiteye (Vaccinium ashei) and southern highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum) by supplying NO to the roots, leaf surface, or through the cut stem. Both species displayed relatively low but similar root uptake rates for both forms of inorganic N. Nitrate uptake through the roots transiently increased NR activity by up to 3.3-fold and root NR gene expression by up to 4-fold. However, supplying NO to the roots did not increase its transport in the xylem, nor did it increase NR activity in the leaves, indicating that the acquired N was largely assimilated or stored within the roots. Foliar application of NO increased leaf NR activity by up to 3.5-fold, but did not alter NO metabolism-related gene expression, suggesting that blueberries are capable of post translational regulation of NR activity in the shoots. Additionally, supplying NO to the cut ends of stems resulted in around a 5-fold increase in NR activity, a 10-fold increase in NR transcript accumulation, and up to a 195-fold increase in transcript accumulation of NITRITE REDUCTASE (NiR1) which codes for the enzyme catalyzing the conversion of NO to NH. These data indicate that blueberry shoots are capable of assimilating NO when it is directly supplied to these tissues. Together, these data suggest that limitations in the uptake and translocation of NO to the shoots may limit overall NO assimilation capacity in blueberry.
蓝莓(越桔属)被认为对无机氮(N)的铵态(NH)形式的偏好高于硝态(NO)形式。这种氮源偏好与通常较低的同化硝态氮的能力有关,尤其是在茎组织中。硝酸盐同化由硝酸还原酶(NR)介导,NR是一种限速酶,可将NO转化为亚硝酸盐(NO)。我们通过向根部、叶表面或通过切割的茎供应NO,研究了两种蓝莓品种——兔眼蓝莓(Vaccinium ashei)和南高丛蓝莓(Vaccinium corymbosum)中NO同化的潜在限制因素。两种品种对两种无机氮形式的根系吸收速率都相对较低但相似。通过根部吸收硝酸盐会使NR活性瞬时增加高达3.3倍,根部NR基因表达增加高达4倍。然而,向根部供应NO并没有增加其在木质部中的运输,也没有增加叶片中的NR活性,这表明获取的氮主要在根部被同化或储存。叶面喷施NO可使叶片NR活性增加高达3.5倍,但不会改变与NO代谢相关的基因表达,这表明蓝莓能够在茎中对NR活性进行翻译后调控。此外,向茎的切割端供应NO会使NR活性增加约5倍,NR转录本积累增加10倍,以及催化NO转化为NH的亚硝酸还原酶(NiR1)的转录本积累增加高达195倍。这些数据表明,当直接供应给这些组织时,蓝莓茎能够同化NO。总之,这些数据表明,NO向茎的吸收和转运限制可能会限制蓝莓的整体NO同化能力。