Crowell K T, Julian K G, Katzman M, Berg A S, Tinsley A, Williams E D, Koltun W A, Messaris E
Department of Surgery,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Aug;145(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000644. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
Guidelines for the severity classification and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were published by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) in 2010; however, compliance and efficacy of these guidelines has not been widely investigated. This present study assessed compliance with guidelines and its effect on CDI patient outcomes as compared with before these recommendations. A retrospective study included all adult inpatients with an initial episode of CDI treated in a single academic center from January 2009 to August 2014. Patients after guideline publication were compared with patients treated in 2009-2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected to stratify for disease severity. Outcome measures included compliance with guidelines, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and surgical intervention for CDI. A total of 1021 patients with CDI were included. Based upon the 2010 guidelines, 42 (28·8%) of 146 patients treated in 2009 would have been considered undertreated, and treatment progressively improved over time, as inadequate treatment decreased to 10·0% (15/148 patients) in 2014 (P = 0·0005). Overall, patient outcomes with guideline-adherent treatment decreased CDI attributable mortality twofold (P = 0·006) and CDI-related LOS by 1·9 days (P = 0·0009) when compared with undertreated patients. Compliance with IDSA/SHEA guidelines was associated with a decreased risk of mortality and LOS in hospitalized patients with CDI.
美国传染病学会(IDSA)/美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)于2010年发布了艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的严重程度分类及治疗指南;然而,这些指南的依从性和有效性尚未得到广泛研究。本研究评估了与这些建议发布之前相比,指南的依从性及其对CDI患者预后的影响。一项回顾性研究纳入了2009年1月至2014年8月在单一学术中心接受首次CDI发作治疗的所有成年住院患者。将指南发布后的患者与2009 - 2010年治疗的患者进行比较。收集人口统计学、临床和实验室数据以对疾病严重程度进行分层。结局指标包括指南依从性、死亡率、住院时间(LOS)以及CDI的手术干预。共纳入1021例CDI患者。根据2010年指南,2009年治疗的146例患者中有42例(28.8%)被认为治疗不足,且随着时间推移治疗逐渐改善,2014年治疗不足率降至10.0%(148例患者中的15例)(P = 0.0005)。总体而言,与治疗不足的患者相比,遵循指南治疗的患者结局使CDI归因死亡率降低了两倍(P = 0.006),CDI相关住院时间缩短了1.9天(P = 0.0009)。遵循IDSA/SHEA指南与CDI住院患者死亡率和住院时间风险降低相关。