• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感染患者 30 天死亡率的风险预测:一项回顾性队列研究。

Risk prediction for 30-day mortality among patients with infections: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

1Big Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan.

2Department of Medical Research, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, 404 Taiwan.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Nov 12;8:175. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0642-z. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-019-0642-z
PMID:31749963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6852910/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines have unsatisfied performance in predicting severe outcomes after infection (CDI). Our objectives were to develop a risk prediction model for 30-day mortality and to examine its performance among inpatients with CDI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital, a 2111-bed tertiary medical center in central Taiwan. We included adult inpatients who had a first positive culture or toxin assay and had diarrhea as the study population. The main exposure of interest was the biochemical profiles of white blood cell count, serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum albumin, and glucose. The primary outcome was the 30-day all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was the length of stay in the intensive care units (ICU) following CDI. A multivariable Cox model and a logistic regression model were developed using clinically relevant and statistically significant variables for 30-day mortality and for length of ICU stay, respectively. A risk scoring system was established by standardizing the coefficients. We compared the performance of our models and the guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 401 patients, 23.4% died within 30 days. In the multivariable model, malignancy (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.95), ≥ 1.5-fold rise in SCr (HR = 2.27), BUN-to-SCr ratio > 20 (HR = 2.04), and increased glucose (≥ 193 vs < 142 mg/dL, HR = 2.18) were significant predictors of 30-day mortality. For patients who survived the first 30 days of CDI, BUN-to-SCr ratio > 20 (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.01) was the only significant predictor for prolonged (> 9 days) length of ICU stay following CDI. The Harrell's statistic of our Cox model for 30-day mortality (0.727) was significantly superior to those of SHEA-IDSA 2010 (0.645), SHEA-IDSA 2018 (0.591), and ECSMID (0.650). Similarly, the conventional statistic of our logistic regression model for prolonged ICU stay (0.737) was significantly superior to that of the guidelines (SHEA-IDSA 2010,  = 0.600; SHEA-IDSA 2018,  = 0.634; ESCMID,  = 0.645). Our risk prediction scoring system for 30-day mortality correctly reclassified 20.7, 32.1, and 47.9% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model that included novel biomarkers of BUN-to-SCr ratio and glucose have a higher predictive performance of 30-day mortality and prolonged ICU stay following CDI than do the guidelines.

摘要

背景

目前的指南在预测感染后(CDI)的严重结局方面表现不佳。我们的目的是建立一个预测 30 天死亡率的风险预测模型,并在 CDI 住院患者中检验其性能。

方法

这是一项在中国台湾中部的一家拥有 2111 张床位的三级医疗中心的中国医科大学医院进行的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了首次阳性白细胞计数、血清肌酐(SCr)、估计肾小球滤过率、血尿素氮(BUN)、血清白蛋白和葡萄糖培养或毒素检测呈阳性且腹泻的成年住院患者作为研究人群。主要暴露因素为白细胞计数、SCr、估计肾小球滤过率、BUN、血清白蛋白和葡萄糖的生化特征。主要结局是 30 天全因死亡率,次要结局是 CDI 后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的时间长度。使用与 30 天死亡率和 ICU 住院时间相关的有临床意义和统计学意义的变量,分别使用多变量 Cox 模型和逻辑回归模型进行分析。通过标准化系数建立风险评分系统。我们比较了我们的模型和指南的性能。

结果

在 401 名患者中,23.4%的患者在 30 天内死亡。在多变量模型中,恶性肿瘤(风险比[HR] = 1.95)、SCr 升高≥1.5 倍(HR = 2.27)、BUN/SCr 比值>20(HR = 2.04)和血糖升高(≥193 与 <142mg/dL,HR = 2.18)是 30 天死亡率的显著预测因素。对于在 CDI 后存活 30 天的患者,BUN/SCr 比值>20(比值比[OR] = 4.01)是 CDI 后 ICU 住院时间延长(>9 天)的唯一显著预测因素。我们的 Cox 模型用于 30 天死亡率的 Harrell's 统计量(0.727)明显优于 SHEA-IDSA 2010(0.645)、SHEA-IDSA 2018(0.591)和 ECSMID(0.650)。同样,我们的逻辑回归模型用于 ICU 住院时间延长的传统统计量(0.737)明显优于指南(SHEA-IDSA 2010,  = 0.600;SHEA-IDSA 2018,  = 0.634;ESCMID,  = 0.645)。我们的 30 天死亡率风险预测评分系统正确地重新分类了 20.7%、32.1%和 47.9%的患者。

结论

与指南相比,纳入 BUN/SCr 比值和血糖等新型生物标志物的模型对 CDI 后 30 天死亡率和 ICU 住院时间延长的预测性能更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/6852910/bae286f6ff9d/13756_2019_642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/6852910/d78a07e14ca1/13756_2019_642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/6852910/bae286f6ff9d/13756_2019_642_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/6852910/d78a07e14ca1/13756_2019_642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c34/6852910/bae286f6ff9d/13756_2019_642_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk prediction for 30-day mortality among patients with infections: a retrospective cohort study. 感染患者 30 天死亡率的风险预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Nov 12;8:175. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0642-z. eCollection 2019.
2
Outcome of ICU patients with Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染的重症监护病房患者的预后。
Crit Care. 2012 Nov 5;16(6):R215. doi: 10.1186/cc11852.
3
Length of stay and mortality due to Clostridium difficile infection acquired in the intensive care unit.因在重症监护病房获得的艰难梭菌感染导致的住院时间和死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
4
Systemic Inflammatory Mediators Are Effective Biomarkers for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection.系统炎症介质是预测艰难梭菌感染不良结局的有效生物标志物。
mBio. 2020 May 5;11(3):e00180-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00180-20.
5
Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with hematological malignancy: A multicenter study in Taiwan.艰难梭菌感染的血液病患者:台湾的一项多中心研究。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021 Dec;54(6):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
6
Poor functional status as a risk factor for severe Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized older adults.较差的功能状态是导致住院老年患者发生严重艰难梭菌感染的一个危险因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Oct;61(10):1738-42. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12442. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
7
Concordance of the SHEA-IDSA severity classification for Clostridium difficile infection and the ATLAS bedside scoring system in hospitalized adult patients.艰难梭菌感染的 SHEA-IDSA 严重程度分类与住院成年患者床边 ATLAS 评分系统的一致性。
Infection. 2014 Dec;42(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0671-8. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
8
Incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection at a Saudi Tertiary Academic Medical Center and compliance with IDSA/SHEA, ACG, and ESCMID guidelines for treatment over a 10-year period.在沙特阿拉伯一家三级学术医疗中心,艰难梭菌感染的发生率,以及在过去 10 年中遵循 IDSA/SHEA、ACG 和 ESCMID 指南进行治疗的情况。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Aug;13(8):1156-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Initial therapy affects duration of diarrhoea in critically ill patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI).初始治疗会影响艰难梭菌感染(CDI)危重症患者腹泻的持续时间。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 9;23(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2648-6.
10
Lack of adherence to SHEA-IDSA treatment guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection is associated with increased mortality.不遵守美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)和美国感染病学会(IDSA)关于艰难梭菌感染的治疗指南与死亡率增加相关。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Feb;72(2):574-581. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw423. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Recurrence and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with : A Nationwide Study.[具体疾病名称]患者复发及院内死亡的危险因素:一项全国性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 10;14(14):4907. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144907.
2
Importance of Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) Emitter Configuration for Clostridioides difficile Attenuation.紫外线-C(UV-C)发射器配置对艰难梭菌减毒的重要性。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71096. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71096. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Infection: Clinical Practice and Health Outcomes in 6 Large Tertiary Hospitals in Eastern Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the SHEA/IDSA severity criteria to predict poor outcomes among inpatients and outpatients with infection.评估 SHEA/IDSA 严重程度标准对住院和门诊感染患者不良预后的预测价值。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 May;41(5):510-516. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.8. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149.
3
感染:澳大利亚东部6家大型三级医院的临床实践与健康结局
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 May 3;10(6):ofad232. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad232. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Gray level co-occurrence matrix and wavelet analyses reveal discrete changes in proximal tubule cell nuclei after mild acute kidney injury.灰度共生矩阵和小波分析显示轻度急性肾损伤后近端肾小管细胞核的离散变化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 10;13(1):4025. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31205-7.
5
Performance of Clostridioides difficile infection severity scores and risk factors related to 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with cancer.艰难梭菌感染严重程度评分表现与癌症患者 30 天全因死亡率相关的危险因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Feb 27;31(3):187. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07651-4.
6
A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Infection.一种用于识别复杂感染的预测模型。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 2;10(2):ofad049. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad049. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Early Prognostic Stratification of Infection in the Emergency Department: The Role of Age and Comorbidities.急诊科感染的早期预后分层:年龄和合并症的作用。
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 24;12(10):1573. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101573.
8
Capturing the environment of the Clostridioides difficile infection cycle.捕捉艰难梭菌感染周期的环境。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;19(8):508-520. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00610-0. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Risk Scoring System of Mortality and Prediction Model of Hospital Stay for Critically Ill Patients Receiving Parenteral Nutrition.接受肠外营养的危重症患者死亡率风险评分系统及住院时间预测模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):853. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070853.
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
临床预测模型的判别与校准:医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
4
Compliance with Clostridium difficile treatment guidelines: effect on patient outcomes.遵守艰难梭菌治疗指南:对患者结局的影响。
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Aug;145(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000644. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact.亚洲艰难梭菌感染的出现:发病率及影响的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 2;12(5):e0176797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176797. eCollection 2017.
6
Lack of adherence to SHEA-IDSA treatment guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection is associated with increased mortality.不遵守美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA)和美国感染病学会(IDSA)关于艰难梭菌感染的治疗指南与死亡率增加相关。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Feb;72(2):574-581. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw423. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
7
Regression coefficient-based scoring system should be used to assign weights to the risk index.基于回归系数的评分系统应被用于为风险指数赋权。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Application of the ATLAS score for evaluating the severity of Clostridium difficile infection in teaching hospitals in Mexico.应用ATLAS评分评估墨西哥教学医院艰难梭菌感染的严重程度。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
9
Current Trends in the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infection.目前艰难梭菌感染的流行病学和结局趋势。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60 Suppl 2:S66-71. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ140.
10
Clostridium difficile infection in diabetes.艰难梭菌感染与糖尿病。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Sep;105(3):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 21.