Alders Peter, Comijs Hannie C, Deeg Dorly J H
Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center and GGZ inGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Ageing. 2016 Aug 8;14(2):123-131. doi: 10.1007/s10433-016-0393-0. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Using data from two cohorts, we examine to what extent a decline in institutional care in the Netherlands is associated with changes in the need for care and/or societal factors. We compared older adults, aged 65-89, who were admitted to a long-term care (LTC) institution in the period 1996-1999 and 2006-2009. Using the Andersen model, we tested per block of predisposing, enabling and need factors, which factors were significant predictors of admission to institutional care. With a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition regression, we decomposed the difference in admission to an LTC institution between the period 1996-1999 and 2006-2009 into a part that is due to differences in health needs and other factors such as effect of policy, social values, and technology. Between 1996 and 2006, the percentage of co-residing partners and income increased and the average level of loneliness decreased significantly. The prevalence of disability, chronic diseases, however, increased. Whereas the care by partners declined, the formal care by professionals increased. Although the observed decline in the admission rate to institutional care was relatively small across the 10 years (from 5.3 % in 1996-1999 to 4.5 % in 2006-2009, a 15 % decrease), the probability of admission in 2006-2009 was relatively much lower when accounting for changes in the health and social conditions of the participants: the probability was 1.7-2.1 % point lower for adults in the period 2006-2009 compared to 1996-1999, a 32-40 % decrease. Our results show that the decline in the admission rate to LTC institutions is not the result of changes in need. The decline is suggested to be the combined effect of changes in policy, technological advances and changes in social norms.
利用两个队列的数据,我们研究了荷兰机构护理的减少在多大程度上与护理需求的变化和/或社会因素相关。我们比较了1996 - 1999年和2006 - 2009年期间入住长期护理(LTC)机构的65 - 89岁老年人。使用安德森模型,我们针对每一组易患因素、促成因素和需求因素进行测试,以确定哪些因素是机构护理入院的显著预测因素。通过布林德 - 奥萨克分解回归,我们将1996 - 1999年和2006 - 2009年期间入住LTC机构的差异分解为一部分归因于健康需求的差异以及其他因素,如政策、社会价值观和技术的影响。1996年至2006年期间,共同居住伴侣的比例和收入增加,孤独感的平均水平显著下降。然而,残疾和慢性病的患病率有所上升。伴侣提供的护理减少,而专业人员提供的正式护理增加。尽管在这10年期间观察到的机构护理入院率下降相对较小(从1996 - 1999年的5.3%降至2006 - 2009年的4.5%,下降了15%),但考虑到参与者健康和社会状况的变化,2006 - 2009年入院的概率相对要低得多:与1996 - 1999年相比,2006 - 2009年期间成年人的入院概率低1.7 - 2.1个百分点,下降了32 - 40%。我们的结果表明,LTC机构入院率的下降不是需求变化的结果。这种下降被认为是政策变化、技术进步和社会规范变化的综合影响。