Okazaki Narihiro, Burghardt Andrew J, Chiba Ko, Schafer Anne L, Majumdar Sharmila
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Japan.
Bone Rep. 2016 Nov 2;5:312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2016.10.005. eCollection 2016 Dec.
The primary objective of this study was to analyze the relationships between bone microstructure and strength, and male osteoporosis risk factors including age, body mass index, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, and testosterone level. A secondary objective was to compare microstructural and strength parameters between men with normal, low, and osteoporosis-range areal bone mineral density (aBMD).
Seventy-eight healthy male volunteers (mean age 62.4 ± 7.8 years, range 50-84 years) were recruited. The participants underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) of the ultra-distal radius and tibia. From the HR-pQCT images, volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and cortical and trabecular bone microstructure were evaluated, and bone strength and cortical load fraction (Ct.LF) were estimated using micro-finite element analysis (μFEA).
Age was more strongly correlated with bone microstructure than other risk factors. Age had significant positive correlations with cortical porosity at both ultra-distal radius and tibia ( = 0.36, = 0.001, and = 0.47, < 0.001, respectively). At the tibia, age was negatively correlated with cortical BMD, whereas it was positively correlated with trabecular BMD. In μFEA, age was negatively correlated with Ct.LF, although not with bone strength. Compared with men with normal aBMD, men with low or osteoporosis-range aBMD had significantly poor trabecular bone microstructure and lower bone strength at the both sites, while there was no significant difference in cortical bone.
Cortical bone microstructure was negatively affected by aging, and there was a suggestion that the influence of aging may be particularly important at the weight-bearing sites.
本研究的主要目的是分析骨微结构与强度之间的关系,以及男性骨质疏松症风险因素,包括年龄、体重指数、血清25-羟基维生素D水平和睾酮水平。次要目的是比较骨密度(aBMD)正常、偏低和处于骨质疏松范围的男性之间的微结构和强度参数。
招募了78名健康男性志愿者(平均年龄62.4±7.8岁,范围50 - 84岁)。参与者接受了双能X线吸收法(DXA)以及超远端桡骨和胫骨的高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)。从HR-pQCT图像中评估体积骨密度(BMD)以及皮质骨和小梁骨的微结构,并使用微有限元分析(μFEA)估计骨强度和皮质负荷分数(Ct.LF)。
年龄与骨微结构的相关性比其他风险因素更强。年龄与超远端桡骨和胫骨的皮质孔隙率均呈显著正相关(分别为r = 0.36,P = 0.001和r = 0.47,P < 0.001)。在胫骨处,年龄与皮质BMD呈负相关,而与小梁BMD呈正相关。在μFEA中,年龄与Ct.LF呈负相关,尽管与骨强度无关。与aBMD正常的男性相比,aBMD偏低或处于骨质疏松范围的男性在两个部位的小梁骨微结构明显较差且骨强度较低,而皮质骨方面无显著差异。
皮质骨微结构受到衰老的负面影响,并且有迹象表明衰老的影响在负重部位可能尤为重要。