• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经外侧窦底提升术治疗后萎缩性上颌后区的双窗口与单窗口技术的前瞻性随机对照研究:为期 1 年的观察阶段结果。

A prospective randomized controlled trial of two-window versus solo-window technique by lateral sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: Results from a 1-year observational phase.

机构信息

Fourth Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):783-792. doi: 10.1111/cid.12505. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1111/cid.12505
PMID:28580654
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implant failures are more common when multiple missing posterior teeth need lateral sinus floor elevation owing to inadequate tissue maturation after grafting. Effects of lateral window dimensions on vital bone formation have rarely been compared.

PURPOSE

To compare endo-sinus bone formation between two- and solo-window techniques to rehabilitate multiple missing posterior teeth that need substantial augmentation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with severely atrophic posterior maxilla were randomized to receive lateral sinus floor elevation via solo or two bony windows. Bone core specimens harvested from lateral aspect of the augmentation sites were histomorphometrically analyzed. Proportions of mineralized bone (MB), bone substitute materials (BS), and nonmineralized tissue (NMT) were quantified.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients underwent 23 maxillary sinus augmentations. One patient in each group dropped out during the follow-up period. Lateral window dimensions were 81.65 ± 4.59 and 118.04 ± 19.53 mm in the test and control groups, respectively. Histomorphometric analysis revealed mean MB of 42.32% ± 13.07% and 26.00% ± 15.23%, BS of 40.34% ± 9.52% and 60.03% ± 10.13%, and NMT of 18.14% ± 14.24% and 14.75% ± 10.38% in test and control groups, respectively, with significant differences.

CONCLUSION

The two-window technique could facilitate faster maturation and consolidation of the grafted volume and is an effective alternative for rehabilitation of severely atrophic posterior maxilla with multiple missing posterior teeth.

摘要

背景

由于在进行移植后组织成熟度不足,当多个后牙缺失需要进行侧窦底提升时,植入物失败更为常见。侧向窗口尺寸对骨形成的影响很少被比较。

目的

比较双窗口和单窗口技术在修复需要大量增强的多个后牙缺失时的窦内骨形成。

方法和材料

患有严重上颌后牙萎缩的患者被随机分为接受单窗口或双骨窗的外侧窦底提升。从增强部位的外侧采集骨芯标本,进行组织形态计量学分析。定量分析矿化骨(MB)、骨替代材料(BS)和未矿化组织(NMT)的比例。

结果

21 名患者接受了 23 例上颌窦增强术。每组各有 1 名患者在随访期间脱落。实验组和对照组的侧向窗口尺寸分别为 81.65 ± 4.59 和 118.04 ± 19.53 mm。组织形态计量学分析显示,实验组和对照组的 MB 平均值分别为 42.32% ± 13.07%和 26.00% ± 15.23%,BS 平均值分别为 40.34% ± 9.52%和 60.03% ± 10.13%,NMT 平均值分别为 18.14% ± 14.24%和 14.75% ± 10.38%,差异有统计学意义。

结论

双窗口技术可以促进移植物更快成熟和整合,是一种治疗多个后牙缺失的严重上颌后牙萎缩的有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized controlled trial of two-window versus solo-window technique by lateral sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: Results from a 1-year observational phase.经外侧窦底提升术治疗后萎缩性上颌后区的双窗口与单窗口技术的前瞻性随机对照研究:为期 1 年的观察阶段结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):783-792. doi: 10.1111/cid.12505. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
2
A prospective randomized controlled trial of the two-window technique without membrane versus the solo-window technique with membrane over the osteotomy window for maxillary sinus augmentation.前瞻性随机对照试验研究了两种开窗技术,一种是不使用骨膜的双窗口技术,另一种是在骨切开窗上使用骨膜的单窗口技术,用于上颌窦提升。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):1099-1105. doi: 10.1111/cid.12547. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
Outcomes of 6.5-mm Hydrophilic Implants and Long Implants Placed with Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation in the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Comparison.6.5毫米亲水种植体和后牙区萎缩上颌窦底提升植入长种植体的效果:一项前瞻性随机对照临床比较研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Feb;19(1):111-122. doi: 10.1111/cid.12439. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
4
Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Bone Window Repositioning I: Clinical and Radiographic Results in 102 Consecutively Treated Patients Followed from 1 to 5 Years.采用外侧入路和骨窗复位的上颌窦底提升术I:102例连续治疗患者1至5年的临床和影像学结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):827-34. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4570.
5
Sinus Floor Elevation Using the Lateral Approach and Window Repositioning and a Xenogeneic Bone Substitute as a Grafting Material: A Histologic, Histomorphometric, and Radiographic Analysis.采用外侧入路和开窗复位术的上颌窦底提升术及使用异种骨替代物作为移植材料:组织学、组织形态计量学和影像学分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 September/October;33(5):1089–1096. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6226. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Maxillary sinus augmentation using sinus membrane elevation and peripheral venous blood for implant-supported rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla: case series.使用窦膜提升术和外周静脉血进行上颌窦增量术以实现萎缩性上颌后牙区种植支持修复:病例系列
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00043.x.
7
Effect of barrier membranes on the outcomes of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a meta-analysis of histomorphometric outcomes.屏障膜对上颌窦底提升术效果的影响:组织形态计量学结果的Meta分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):607-18. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3886. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study.短种植体在萎缩窦内或不进行植骨的情况下植入:一项前瞻性随机对照研究的 5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):877-886. doi: 10.1111/clr.12893. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
9
Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature.萎缩性上颌后牙区治疗的长期疗效:文献系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):120-32. doi: 10.1111/cid.12077. Epub 2013 May 8.
10
Clinical evaluation of short 6-mm implants alone, short 8-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation and standard 10-mm implants combined with osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.后上颌骨中单独使用6毫米短种植体、结合骨凿上颌窦底提升术的8毫米短种植体以及结合骨凿上颌窦底提升术的标准10毫米种植体的临床评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 30;16:324. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0853-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Different Materials for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Lateral Approach. A Systematic Review.外侧入路不同材料用于上颌窦底提升术的疗效:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70053. doi: 10.1111/cid.70053.
2
The use of corticosteroids in the lateral sinus augmentation surgical procedure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.外侧窦提升术中皮质类固醇的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Dec;24(6):776-791. doi: 10.1111/cid.13126. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
The bone lid technique in lateral sinus lift: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
骨瓣技术在侧窦提升术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Aug 29;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00433-3.
4
Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: A randomized trial.经牙槽嵴和外侧窦底提升术后的发病率:一项随机试验。
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Sep;45(9):1128-1139. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12985. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
5
[Application of modified lateral window for maxillary sinus floor augmentation].改良外侧开窗在上颌窦底提升术中的应用
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 May 25;46(6):630-636. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2017.12.09.