George W. Sledge Jr., Stanford University, Stanford; Han Koh, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Bellflower, CA; Masakazu Toi, Kyoto University; Kenichi Inoue, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama; Norikazu Masuda, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Patrick Neven, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Joohyuk Sohn, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea; Xavier Pivot, CHU de Besancon Hopital Jean Minjoz, Besancon Cedex; Nawel Bourayou, Eli Lilly, Paris, France; Olga Burdaeva, Arkhangelsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation; Meena Okera, Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, Australia; Peter A. Kaufman, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eva-Maria Grischke, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Frauenklinik, Tübingen, Germany; Martin Frenzel, Yong Lin, and Ian C. Smith, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN; Susana Barriga, Eli Lilly, Madrid; and Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau Vilanova, Valencia, Spain.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-2884. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
Purpose MONARCH 2 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107703) compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, plus fulvestrant with fulvestrant alone in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods MONARCH 2 was a global, double-blind, phase III study of women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who had progressed while receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from the end of adjuvant ET, or while receiving first-line ET for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily) on a continuous schedule and fulvestrant (500 mg, per label). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and key secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Results Between August 2014 and December 2015, 669 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (n = 446) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 223). Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly extended PFS versus fulvestrant alone (median, 16.4 v 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.553; 95% CI, 0.449 to 0.681; P < .001). In patients with measurable disease, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant achieved an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI, 42.6% to 53.6%) compared with 21.3% (95% CI, 15.1% to 27.6%) in the control arm. The most common adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo arms were diarrhea (86.4% v 24.7%), neutropenia (46.0% v 4.0%), nausea (45.1% v 22.9%), and fatigue (39.9% v 26.9%). Conclusions Abemaciclib at 150 mg twice daily plus fulvestrant was effective, significantly improving PFS and ORR and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who progressed while receiving ET.
MONARCH 2(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02107703)比较了 abemaciclib(一种选择性细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4 和 6 抑制剂)联合氟维司群与氟维司群单药治疗激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性晚期乳腺癌(ABC)患者的疗效和安全性。
MONARCH 2 是一项全球性、双盲、III 期研究,纳入了激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性 ABC 患者,这些患者在接受新辅助或辅助内分泌治疗(ET)期间或在辅助 ET 结束后 12 个月内进展,或在转移性疾病中接受一线 ET 期间进展。患者按 2:1 的比例随机分配接受 abemaciclib 或安慰剂(每日两次,每次 150mg)联合氟维司群(500mg,按标签)治疗。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS),关键次要终点包括总生存期、客观缓解率(ORR)、缓解持续时间、临床获益率、生活质量和安全性。
2014 年 8 月至 2015 年 12 月,669 例患者被随机分配接受 abemaciclib 联合氟维司群(n=446)或安慰剂联合氟维司群(n=223)治疗。与氟维司群单药治疗相比,abemaciclib 联合氟维司群显著延长了 PFS(中位 PFS:16.4 个月比 9.3 个月;风险比,0.553;95%CI,0.449 至 0.681;P<0.001)。在可测量疾病患者中,abemaciclib 联合氟维司群组的客观缓解率为 48.1%(95%CI,42.6%至 53.6%),而对照组为 21.3%(95%CI,15.1%至 27.6%)。abemaciclib 组与安慰剂组相比,最常见的不良反应为腹泻(86.4%比 24.7%)、中性粒细胞减少(46.0%比 4.0%)、恶心(45.1%比 22.9%)和疲劳(39.9%比 26.9%)。
每日两次 150mg 的 abemaciclib 联合氟维司群治疗,可显著改善 PFS 和 ORR,且在接受 ET 治疗进展的激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性 ABC 患者中具有可耐受的安全性。