Jongbloed Elisabeth M, Wortelboer Noor, de Weerd Vanja, Beaufort Corine M, Ruigrok-Ritstier Kirsten, Van Mai N, Kraan Jaco, van Zweeden Annette A, van der Padt-Pruijsten Annemieke, Hamming Lisanne C, Konings Inge R, Sonke Gabe S, Oomen-de Hoop Esther, Martens John W M, Jager Agnes, Wilting Saskia M
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.
Nat Med. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03935-w.
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcome in patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive, HER2 breast cancer. The phase 3 SONIA trial compared the addition of CDK4/6i to first- versus second-line endocrine therapy for time to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival after two lines of treatment (PFS2)), as well as for secondary outcomes overall survival, PFS after one line of treatment (PFS1), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), toxicity and cost-effectiveness. No significant difference in PFS2 was observed; however, on an individual patient level this may be different. Using prespecified circulating tumor DNA analyses, we performed an exploratory study to evaluate whether pretreatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels in plasma can identify patients that benefit from CDK4/6i during their first-line treatment. Cell free DNA before start of first-line treatment from 409 female patients participating in SONIA was analyzed with the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system. This assay yields a genome-wide aneuploidy score, indicative of ctDNA levels. Cox proportional hazard analyses for PFS1 and PFS2 were performed separately for the ctDNA high group (aneuploidy score ≥ 5) and the ctDNA low group (aneuploidy score < 5). In total, 141 of the 409 included patients had a high genome-wide aneuploidy score at baseline. PFS2 in the first- compared to the second-line CDK4/6i strategy showed hazard ratios of 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.88) and 1.36 (95% confidence interval 0.95-1.96) in the high and low aneuploidy group, respectively. A significant interaction was demonstrated between treatment strategy and aneuploidy score for PFS2 (P = 0.004). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that pretreatment ctDNA levels can be used to identify patients that benefit from first-line CDK4/6i treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03425838 .
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)可改善晚期雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌患者的预后。3期SONIA试验比较了在一线和二线内分泌治疗中添加CDK4/6i对二线治疗后疾病进展时间(两线治疗后的无进展生存期(PFS2))的影响,以及对总生存期、一线治疗后的无进展生存期(PFS1)、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)、毒性和成本效益等次要结局的影响。未观察到PFS2有显著差异;然而,在个体患者层面可能有所不同。我们使用预先设定的循环肿瘤DNA分析方法进行了一项探索性研究,以评估血浆中预处理的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)水平是否能够识别出在一线治疗期间从CDK4/6i治疗中获益的患者。采用改良的快速非整倍体筛查试验测序系统,对参与SONIA试验的409例女性患者一线治疗开始前的游离DNA进行了分析。该检测可得出全基因组非整倍体评分,指示ctDNA水平。分别对ctDNA高分组(非整倍体评分≥5)和ctDNA低分组(非整倍体评分<5)进行PFS1和PFS2的Cox比例风险分析。在纳入的409例患者中,共有141例在基线时全基因组非整倍体评分较高。在高非整倍体组和低非整倍体组中,一线与二线CDK4/6i治疗策略相比,PFS2的风险比分别为0.58(95%置信区间0.38 - 0.88)和1.36(95%置信区间0.95 - 1.96)。PFS2的治疗策略与非整倍体评分之间存在显著交互作用(P = 0.004)。总之,本研究表明,预处理的ctDNA水平可用于识别从一线CDK4/6i治疗中获益的患者。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT03425838 。