• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善为患有精神疾病的罪犯提供支持的专业人员之间的协作。

Improving collaboration between professionals supporting mentally ill offenders.

作者信息

Hean Sarah, Ødegård Atle, Willumsen Elisabeth

机构信息

University of Stavanger , Stavanger, Norway.

Bournemouth University , Bournemouth, UK.

出版信息

Int J Prison Health. 2017 Jun 12;13(2):91-104. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-12-2016-0072.

DOI:10.1108/IJPH-12-2016-0072
PMID:28581376
Abstract

Purpose Interprofessional collaboration is necessary when supporting mentally ill offenders but little is understood of these interactions. The purpose of this paper is to explore prison officers' perceptions of current and desirable levels of interprofessional collaboration (relational coordination (RC)) to understand how collaboration between these systems can be improved. Design/methodology/approach Gittell's RC scale was administered to prison officers within the Norwegian prison system ( n=160) using an adaptation of the instrument in which actual and desired levels of RC are evaluated. This differentiates between prison officers' expectations of optimum levels of collaboration with other professional groups, dependent on the role function and codependence, vs actual levels of collaboration. Findings Prison officers reported different RC levels across professional groups, the lowest being with specialist mental health staff and prison doctors and highest with nurses, social workers and other prison officers. Significant differences between desired and actual RC levels suggest expertise of primary care staff is insufficient, as prison officers request much greater contact with mental health specialists when dealing with the mentally ill offender. Originality/value The paper contributes to limited literature on collaborative practice between prison and health care professionals. It questions the advisability of enforcing care pathways that promote the lowest level of effective care in the prison system and suggest ways in which mental health specialists might be better integrated into the prison system. It contributes to the continued debate on how mental health services should be integrated into the prison system, suggesting that the current import model used in Norway and other countries, may not be conducive to generating the close professional relationships required between mental health and prison staff.

摘要

目的 在支持患有精神疾病的罪犯时,跨专业协作是必要的,但对于这些互动的了解却很少。本文的目的是探讨狱警对当前及理想的跨专业协作水平(关系协调(RC))的看法,以了解如何改善这些系统之间的协作。

设计/方法/途径 使用Gittell的RC量表对挪威监狱系统内的狱警(n = 160)进行施测,该量表采用了一种改编形式,用于评估RC的实际水平和期望水平。这区分了狱警根据角色功能和相互依存关系对与其他专业群体的最佳协作水平的期望与实际协作水平。

发现 狱警报告称不同专业群体的RC水平存在差异,与精神卫生专业人员和监狱医生的协作水平最低,与护士、社会工作者和其他狱警的协作水平最高。期望的和实际的RC水平之间的显著差异表明基层医疗人员的专业知识不足,因为狱警在处理患有精神疾病的罪犯时要求与精神卫生专家有更多接触。

原创性/价值 本文为关于监狱和医疗保健专业人员之间协作实践的有限文献做出了贡献。它质疑了在监狱系统中推行促进最低有效护理水平的护理路径的可取性,并提出了将精神卫生专家更好地融入监狱系统的方法。它有助于持续讨论如何将精神卫生服务融入监狱系统,表明挪威和其他国家目前采用的引入模式可能不利于产生精神卫生和监狱工作人员之间所需的密切专业关系。

相似文献

1
Improving collaboration between professionals supporting mentally ill offenders.改善为患有精神疾病的罪犯提供支持的专业人员之间的协作。
Int J Prison Health. 2017 Jun 12;13(2):91-104. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-12-2016-0072.
2
Exploring Norwegian prison frontline workers' perceptions of inter professional collaboration - a pilot study.探索挪威监狱一线工作人员对跨专业协作的看法——一项试点研究。
Int J Prison Health. 2022 Nov 24;18(4):429-442. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0084. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Implementing change: staff experiences of changes to prison mental healthcare in England and Wales.实施变革:英格兰和威尔士监狱精神卫生保健变革中的工作人员经历
Int J Prison Health. 2012;8(1):7-15. doi: 10.1108/17449201211268246.
4
[Treatment of offenders with mental disorders: focusing on prison psychiatry].[对患有精神障碍的罪犯的治疗:聚焦监狱精神病学]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2011;113(5):458-67.
5
Key successes and challenges in providing mental health care in an urban male remand prison: a qualitative study.城市男性还押监狱提供心理健康护理的关键成功因素与挑战:一项定性研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;51(4):589-96. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1170-2. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Correctional officers and the incarcerated mentally ill: responses to psychiatric illness in prison.惩教人员与被监禁的精神病患者:监狱中对精神疾病的应对措施
Med Anthropol Q. 2015 Mar;29(1):116-36. doi: 10.1111/maq.12137. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
7
[Prisoners in security cells: a professional challenge].[安全牢房中的囚犯:一项专业挑战]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 Jun 26;123(13-14):1844-6.
8
Assaults by Mentally Disordered Offenders in Prison: Equity and Equivalence.监狱中精神错乱罪犯的攻击行为:公平与等效性
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Jun;13(2):317-26. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9698-0. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
9
Collaborative practices between correctional and mental health services in Norway: Expanding the roles and responsibility competence domain.挪威惩教服务与心理健康服务之间的合作实践:拓展角色与责任能力领域。
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):18-27. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1233392. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
10
Making sense of interactions between mental health and criminal justice services: the utility of cultural historical activity systems theory.理解心理健康与刑事司法服务之间的相互作用:文化历史活动系统理论的效用。
Int J Prison Health. 2018 Jun 11;14(2):124-141. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-01-2017-0006.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the challenges to safer prescribing and medication monitoring in prisons: A qualitative study with health care staff.探索监狱中更安全的处方和药物监测所面临的挑战:一项针对医护人员的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0275907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275907. eCollection 2022.