Suppr超能文献

适形调强放射治疗计划安全验证的计算机系统

Computerized System for Safety Verification of External Beam Radiation Therapy Planning.

作者信息

Holdsworth Clay, Kukluk Jacek, Molodowitch Christina, Czerminska Maria, Hancox Cindy, Cormack Robert A, Beaudette Kevin, Killoran Joseph H

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report an assessment of in-house software, Verifier, developed to improve efficacy and efficiency of the radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning process and quality control review (QCR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiation therapy plan parameters retrieved from our treatment planning database are used by automated tests to give 75 types of warnings, such as prescription and plan discrepancies. The software is continuously updated on the basis of new issues, ideas, and planning policies. Verifier was retrospectively assessed (2007-2015) by examining impact on treatment plan revisions, frequency of quality improvement incident reports of avoidable RT plan-related safety events, unaddressed issues, and staff efficiency.

RESULTS

Plan revisions for specific issues declined dramatically in response to implementation of corresponding Verifier tests. Between 2012 and 2015 our institution's total rate of plan revisions dropped from 18.0% to 11.2%. Between 2008 and 2015 specific tests were added to Verifier while the rate of corresponding avoidable safety events was reduced from 0.34% to 0.00% over the same period. Simulations suggest Verifier saves approximately 2 to 5 minutes per QCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in quantifiable metrics of plan revisions and incident reports suggests automatic RT plan-checking software enhances patient safety and clinical efficiency. Although only modest time savings may be gained using Verifier for the QCR itself, the greater impact on efficiency is through avoiding late-stage plan modifications and improving documentation via automation. We encourage other institutions to consider working toward adding similar technologies to enhance their RT quality assurance programs.

摘要

目的

报告对内部开发的软件Verifier的评估,该软件旨在提高放射治疗(RT)治疗计划流程和质量控制审查(QCR)的有效性和效率。

方法和材料

从我们的治疗计划数据库中检索到的放射治疗计划参数用于自动化测试,以给出75种类型的警告,例如处方和计划差异。该软件会根据新出现的问题、想法和计划政策不断更新。通过检查对治疗计划修订的影响、可避免的RT计划相关安全事件的质量改进事件报告频率、未解决的问题以及工作人员效率,对Verifier进行了回顾性评估(2007 - 2015年)。

结果

针对特定问题的计划修订因相应的Verifier测试的实施而大幅下降。2012年至2015年期间,我们机构的计划修订总率从18.0%降至11.2%。2008年至2015年期间,Verifier添加了特定测试,而同期相应的可避免安全事件发生率从0.34%降至0.00%。模拟表明,Verifier每次QCR可节省约2至5分钟。

结论

计划修订和事件报告的可量化指标的下降表明,自动RT计划检查软件可提高患者安全性和临床效率。虽然使用Verifier进行QCR本身可能仅节省少量时间,但对效率的更大影响在于避免后期计划修改并通过自动化改进文档记录。我们鼓励其他机构考虑采用类似技术来加强其RT质量保证计划。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验