• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动化计划检查(APC)工具和六西格玛方法优化外照射放射治疗的效率和安全性。

Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):56-64. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12678.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.12678
PMID:31423729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6698761/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop and implement an automated plan check (APC) tool using a Six Sigma methodology with the aim of improving safety and efficiency in external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS

The Six Sigma define-measure-analyze-improve-control (DMAIC) framework was used by measuring defects stemming from treatment planning that were reported to the departmental incidence learning system (ILS). The common error pathways observed in the reported data were combined with our departmental physics plan check list, and AAPM TG-275 identified items. Prioritized by risk priority number (RPN) and severity values, the check items were added to the APC tool developed using Varian Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI). At 9 months post-APC implementation, the tool encompassed 89 check items, and its effectiveness was evaluated by comparing RPN values and rates of reported errors. To test the efficiency gains, physics plan check time and reported error rate were prospectively compared for 20 treatment plans.

RESULTS

The APC tool was successfully implemented for external beam plan checking. FMEA RPN ranking re-evaluation at 9 months post-APC demonstrated a statistically significant average decrease in RPN values from 129.2 to 83.7 (P < .05). After the introduction of APC, the average frequency of reported treatment-planning errors was reduced from 16.1% to 4.1%. For high-severity errors, the reduction was 82.7% for prescription/plan mismatches and 84.4% for incorrect shift note. The process shifted from 4σ to 5σ quality for isocenter-shift errors. The efficiency study showed a statistically significant decrease in plan check time (10.1 ± 7.3 min, P = .005) and decrease in errors propagating to physics plan check (80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of APC tool has significantly reduced the error rate. The DMAIC framework can provide an iterative and robust workflow to improve the efficiency and quality of treatment planning procedure enabling a safer radiotherapy process.

摘要

目的

使用六西格玛方法开发和实施自动化计划检查 (APC) 工具,旨在提高外照射放射治疗的安全性和效率。

方法

使用六西格玛定义-测量-分析-改进-控制 (DMAIC) 框架,通过测量向部门事件学习系统 (ILS) 报告的治疗计划中的缺陷来进行测量。将报告数据中观察到的常见错误途径与我们部门的物理计划检查清单和 AAPM TG-275 确定的项目相结合。根据风险优先级数 (RPN) 和严重程度值进行优先级排序后,将检查项添加到使用 Varian Eclipse 脚本应用程序编程接口 (ESAPI) 开发的 APC 工具中。在 APC 实施后 9 个月,该工具包含 89 个检查项,并通过比较 RPN 值和报告错误率来评估其有效性。为了测试效率提高,前瞻性比较了 20 个治疗计划的物理计划检查时间和报告错误率。

结果

成功实施了外部束计划检查的 APC 工具。APC 实施后 9 个月的 FMEA RPN 排名重新评估表明,RPN 值从 129.2 平均显着降低到 83.7(P<.05)。引入 APC 后,报告的治疗计划错误的平均频率从 16.1%降低到 4.1%。对于高严重性错误,处方/计划不匹配的减少了 82.7%,不正确的移位说明减少了 84.4%。对于等中心移位错误,该过程从 4σ 转移到 5σ 质量。效率研究表明,计划检查时间有统计学意义的显着减少(10.1±7.3 分钟,P=0.005),并且错误传播到物理计划检查的数量减少(80%)。

结论

APC 工具的引入显着降低了错误率。DMAIC 框架可以提供一个迭代和强大的工作流程,以提高治疗计划过程的效率和质量,从而实现更安全的放射治疗过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/3e6c78550286/ACM2-20-56-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/0ee21b2c905c/ACM2-20-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/2f350e124d1a/ACM2-20-56-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/196fee39f5db/ACM2-20-56-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/63f440f32dc7/ACM2-20-56-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/49fc22145f83/ACM2-20-56-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/3e6c78550286/ACM2-20-56-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/0ee21b2c905c/ACM2-20-56-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/2f350e124d1a/ACM2-20-56-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/196fee39f5db/ACM2-20-56-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/63f440f32dc7/ACM2-20-56-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/49fc22145f83/ACM2-20-56-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6c7/6698761/3e6c78550286/ACM2-20-56-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing efficiency and safety in external beam radiotherapy using automated plan check (APC) tool and six sigma methodology.使用自动化计划检查(APC)工具和六西格玛方法优化外照射放射治疗的效率和安全性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):56-64. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12678.
2
Mitigation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Errors on the Novel RefleXion X1 System Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Within Six Sigma Framework.在六西格玛框架内使用失效模式与效应分析减轻新型RefleXion X1系统上的调强放射治疗和立体定向体部放射治疗治疗计划误差
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 26;8(5):101186. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101186. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
3
Improving treatment plan evaluation with automation.通过自动化改进治疗计划评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):16-31. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6322.
4
Technical Note: Use of automation to eliminate shift errors.技术说明:使用自动化消除轮班错误。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Mar;21(3):192-195. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12830. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Efficiency and safety increases after the implementation of a multi-institutional automated plan check tool at our institution.在我们机构实施多机构自动化计划检查工具后,效率和安全性得到提高。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Apr;21(4):51-58. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12845. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to generate an initial plan check checklist for improved safety in radiation treatment.运用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)制定初始计划检查表,提高放射治疗安全性。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Aug;21(8):83-91. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12918. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Automated Field-In-Field (FIF) Plan Framework Combining Scripting Application Programming Interface and User-Executed Program for Breast Forward IMRT.结合脚本应用程序编程接口和用户执行程序的用于乳腺正向调强放疗的自动野中野(FIF)计划框架
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818810391. doi: 10.1177/1533033818810391.
8
Implement a knowledge-based automated dose volume histogram prediction module in Pinnacle treatment planning system for plan quality assurance and guidance.在 Pinnacle 治疗计划系统中实现基于知识的自动化剂量体积直方图预测模块,以进行计划质量保证和指导。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Aug;20(8):134-140. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12689. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Standardization and automation of quality assurance for high-dose-rate brachytherapy planning with application programming interface.利用应用程序编程接口实现高剂量率近距离放射治疗计划质量保证的标准化和自动化。
Brachytherapy. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):108-114.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Quality Assurance with Plan Veto: reincarnation of a record and verify system and its potential value.质量保证计划否决:记录和验证系统的再现及其潜在价值。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.044.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of human errors in the operation of various treatment planning systems over a 10-year period.分析 10 年间各种治疗计划系统操作中的人为错误。
J Radiat Res. 2024 Sep 24;65(5):603-618. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae053.
2
Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.用于容积调强弧形治疗计划的靶向患者特定质量保证的机器学习与精益六西格玛方法
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Aug 9;31:100617. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100617. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Applying the six-sigma methodology to determine the limits of quality control (QC) tests for a specific linear accelerator.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for effective physics plan and chart review in radiation therapy: Report of AAPM Task Group 275.放疗中物理计划和图表审查的有效策略:AAPM 工作组 275 报告。
Med Phys. 2020 Jun;47(6):e236-e272. doi: 10.1002/mp.14030. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
2
Applying Lean-Six-Sigma Methodology in radiotherapy: Lessons learned by the breast daily repositioning case.应用精益六西格玛方法于放射治疗:以乳腺癌每日复位为例的经验教训。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 May;127(2):326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.019. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Common error pathways seen in the RO-ILS data that demonstrate opportunities for improving treatment safety.
运用六西格玛方法确定特定直线加速器质量控制 (QC) 测试的极限。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14460. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14460. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Enhancing patient safety in radiotherapy: Implementation of a customized electronic checklist for radiation therapists.提高放射治疗中的患者安全:为放射治疗师实施定制的电子检查表。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 28;31:100255. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100255. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Technical Note: Improving the workflow in a carbon ion therapy center with custom software for enhanced patient care.技术说明:使用定制软件改善碳离子治疗中心的工作流程以加强患者护理。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024 Apr 23;30:100251. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100251. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Automated contouring, treatment planning, and quality assurance for VMAT craniospinal irradiation (VMAT-CSI).容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)技术用于颅脊髓照射(VMAT-CSI)的自动轮廓勾画、治疗计划制定及质量保证。
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 10;14:1378449. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1378449. eCollection 2024.
7
Process failure mode and effects analysis for external beam radiotherapy: Introducing a literature-based template and a novel action priority.外部束放射治疗的失效模式和影响分析:引入基于文献的模板和新的行动优先级。
Z Med Phys. 2024 Aug;34(3):358-370. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Implementation of a knowledge-based decision support system for treatment plan auditing through automation.通过自动化实现基于知识的治疗计划审核决策支持系统。
Med Phys. 2023 Nov;50(11):6978-6989. doi: 10.1002/mp.16472. Epub 2023 May 21.
9
Mitigation of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Errors on the Novel RefleXion X1 System Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Within Six Sigma Framework.在六西格玛框架内使用失效模式与效应分析减轻新型RefleXion X1系统上的调强放射治疗和立体定向体部放射治疗治疗计划误差
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jan 26;8(5):101186. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101186. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
10
Unified risk analysis in radiation therapy.放射治疗中的统一风险分析。
Z Med Phys. 2023 Nov;33(4):479-488. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
在 RO-ILS 数据中观察到的常见错误途径,这些途径表明了提高治疗安全性的机会。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.007. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
4
The big data effort in radiation oncology: Data mining or data farming?放射肿瘤学中的大数据工作:数据挖掘还是数据耕作?
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct 13;1(4):260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.10.001. eCollection 2016 Oct-Dec.
5
Computerized System for Safety Verification of External Beam Radiation Therapy Planning.适形调强放射治疗计划安全验证的计算机系统
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Improving treatment plan evaluation with automation.通过自动化改进治疗计划评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):16-31. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6322.
7
The effectiveness of pretreatment physics plan review for detecting errors in radiation therapy.放疗前物理计划审核在检测放疗误差方面的有效性。
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5181. doi: 10.1118/1.4961010.
8
The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management.美国医学物理学家协会第100任务组报告:风险分析方法在放射治疗质量管理中的应用。
Med Phys. 2016 Jul;43(7):4209. doi: 10.1118/1.4947547.
9
Big Data and machine learning in radiation oncology: State of the art and future prospects.大数据和机器学习在放射肿瘤学中的应用:现状和未来展望。
Cancer Lett. 2016 Nov 1;382(1):110-117. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System: A report from the first year of experience.RO-ILS:放射肿瘤学事件学习系统:第一年经验报告
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep-Oct;5(5):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 25.