The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Utrecht University.
J Res Adolesc. 2016 Sep;26(3):443-458. doi: 10.1111/jora.12204. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Parents can use solicitation (asking questions) and control (disclosure rules) to obtain information about adolescents, but only if youths comply. Snooping might uncover additional information, but also strongly violates privacy expectations. Three studies of parents and adolescents examined distinctions between snooping, solicitation, and control. Differences existed in terms of factor structure and frequency (Studies 1-2), links to perceived invasion (Study 1), correlations with problematic communication, behavior, and relationships (Study 2), and parent-adolescent (dis)agreement about acceptability (Study 3). Snooping is a relatively infrequent monitoring behavior, compared to solicitation and control, but appears to be a stronger indicator of problems in adolescent and family functioning. We discuss implications regarding the necessity and appropriateness of particular parental monitoring behaviors.
父母可以通过询问(提问)和控制(披露规则)来获取青少年的信息,但前提是青少年愿意配合。窥探可能会发现更多的信息,但也严重侵犯了隐私期望。三项关于父母和青少年的研究考察了窥探、询问和控制之间的区别。在因素结构和频率方面存在差异(研究 1-2),与感知侵犯的联系(研究 1),与有问题的沟通、行为和关系的相关性(研究 2),以及父母与青少年对可接受性的(意见)分歧(研究 3)。与询问和控制相比,窥探是一种相对较少发生的监控行为,但似乎是青少年和家庭功能出现问题的一个更强指标。我们讨论了特定的父母监控行为的必要性和适当性的含义。