Schindler Ines, Hosoya Georg, Menninghaus Winfried, Beermann Ursula, Wagner Valentin, Eid Michael, Scherer Klaus R
Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178899. eCollection 2017.
Aesthetic perception and judgement are not merely cognitive processes, but also involve feelings. Therefore, the empirical study of these experiences requires conceptualization and measurement of aesthetic emotions. Despite the long-standing interest in such emotions, we still lack an assessment tool to capture the broad range of emotions that occur in response to the perceived aesthetic appeal of stimuli. Elicitors of aesthetic emotions are not limited to the arts in the strict sense, but extend to design, built environments, and nature. In this article, we describe the development of a questionnaire that is applicable across many of these domains: the Aesthetic Emotions Scale (Aesthemos). Drawing on theoretical accounts of aesthetic emotions and an extensive review of extant measures of aesthetic emotions within specific domains such as music, literature, film, painting, advertisements, design, and architecture, we propose a framework for studying aesthetic emotions. The Aesthemos, which is based on this framework, contains 21 subscales with two items each, that are designed to assess the emotional signature of responses to stimuli's perceived aesthetic appeal in a highly differentiated manner. These scales cover prototypical aesthetic emotions (e.g., the feeling of beauty, being moved, fascination, and awe), epistemic emotions (e.g., interest and insight), and emotions indicative of amusement (humor and joy). In addition, the Aesthemos subscales capture both the activating (energy and vitality) and the calming (relaxation) effects of aesthetic experiences, as well as negative emotions that may contribute to aesthetic displeasure (e.g., the feeling of ugliness, boredom, and confusion).
审美感知与判断不仅是认知过程,还涉及情感。因此,对这些体验的实证研究需要对审美情感进行概念化和测量。尽管人们长期以来一直对这类情感感兴趣,但我们仍然缺乏一种评估工具来捕捉因刺激的感知审美吸引力而产生的广泛情感。审美情感的引发因素不仅限于狭义的艺术,还扩展到设计、建筑环境和自然。在本文中,我们描述了一种适用于许多这些领域的问卷的开发:审美情感量表(Aesthemos)。借鉴审美情感的理论阐述以及对音乐、文学、电影、绘画、广告、设计和建筑等特定领域中现有审美情感测量方法的广泛综述,我们提出了一个研究审美情感的框架。基于这个框架的Aesthemos包含21个子量表,每个子量表有两个项目,旨在以高度差异化的方式评估对刺激的感知审美吸引力的反应的情感特征。这些量表涵盖了典型的审美情感(如美感、感动、着迷和敬畏感)、认知情感(如兴趣和洞察力)以及表示娱乐的情感(幽默和喜悦)。此外,Aesthemos子量表既捕捉了审美体验的激活(能量和活力)和平静(放松)效果,也捕捉了可能导致审美不悦的负面情感(如丑陋感、无聊和困惑)。