Suppr超能文献

与全身正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(WB-PET/CT)相比,数字乳腺正电子发射断层扫描(dbPET)对乳腺癌的显示更清晰。

Higher breast cancer conspicuity on dbPET compared to WB-PET/CT.

作者信息

Nishimatsu Kayo, Nakamoto Yuji, Miyake Kanae K, Ishimori Takayoshi, Kanao Shotaro, Toi Masakazu, Togashi Kaori

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.046. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of a dedicated breast positron-emission tomography (dbPET) scanner for breast cancers with an updated reconstruction mode, comparing it to whole-body positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (WB-PET/CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 179 histologically-proven breast cancer lesions in 150 females who underwent both WB-PET/CT and dbPET with F-fluorodeoxyglucose were retrospectively analyzed. The patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities based on visual analysis were compared between dbPET and WB-PET/CT. For lesions visible on both PET images, SUVmax values of the tumors were measured, and tumor-to-background ratios (T/B ratios) of SUVmax were compared between the two scans. Subgroup analyses according to clinical tumor stage, histopathology and histological grade were also performed.

RESULTS

Patient/breast/lesion-based sensitivities were 95%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, for dbPET, and 95%, 94%, and 88%, respectively, for WB-PET/CT. Mean±standard deviation SUVmax values of FDG-avid tumors were 13.0±9.7 on dbPET and 6.4±4.8 on WB-PET. T/B ratios were also significantly higher in dbPET than in WB-PET/CT (8.1±7.1 vs. 5.1±4.5). In the subgroup analysis, no significant differences in sensitivities between dbPET and WB-PET/CT were found. However, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT in cT1c, cT2, cT3, invasive cancer, invasive carcinoma of no special type, mucinous carcinoma and Grades 1-3.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in sensitivities were identified between dbPET using an updated reconstruction mode and WB-PET/CT; however, T/B ratios of dbPET were significantly higher than those of WB-PET/CT, indicating higher tumor conspicuity on dbPET.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估采用更新重建模式的专用乳腺正电子发射断层扫描(dbPET)扫描仪对乳腺癌的病灶检测能力,并与全身正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(WB-PET/CT)进行比较。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了150例接受了WB-PET/CT和使用F-氟脱氧葡萄糖的dbPET检查的女性患者,共179个经组织学证实的乳腺癌病灶。基于视觉分析,比较了dbPET和WB-PET/CT之间基于患者/乳房/病灶的敏感性。对于在两种PET图像上均可见的病灶,测量肿瘤的SUVmax值,并比较两次扫描之间SUVmax的肿瘤与背景比值(T/B比值)。还根据临床肿瘤分期、组织病理学和组织学分级进行了亚组分析。

结果

dbPET基于患者/乳房/病灶的敏感性分别为95%、95%和92%,WB-PET/CT分别为95%、94%和88%。FDG摄取阳性肿瘤的平均±标准差SUVmax值在dbPET上为13.0±9.7,在WB-PET上为6.4±4.8。dbPET的T/B比值也显著高于WB-PET/CT(8.1±7.1对5.1±4.5)。在亚组分析中,未发现dbPET和WB-PET/CT之间的敏感性有显著差异。然而,在cT1c、cT2、cT3、浸润性癌、非特殊类型浸润性癌、黏液癌以及1-3级中,dbPET的T/B比值显著高于WB-PET/CT。

结论

采用更新重建模式的dbPET与WB-PET/CT在敏感性方面未发现显著差异;然而,dbPET的T/B比值显著高于WB-PET/CT,表明dbPET上肿瘤的辨识度更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验