Joachim O. Hero (
Alan M. Zaslavsky is a professor of health care policy (statistics) in the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, in Boston.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):1032-1040. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0006.
We examined income gaps in the period 2011-13 in self-assessments of personal health and health care across thirty-two middle- and high-income countries. While high-income respondents were generally more positive about their health and health care in most countries, the gap between them and low-income respondents was much bigger in some than in others. The United States has among the largest income-related differences in each of the measures we studied, which assessed both respondents' past experiences and their confidence about accessing needed health care in the future. Relatively low levels of moral discomfort over income-based health care disparities despite broad awareness of unmet need indicate more public tolerance for health care inequalities in the United States than elsewhere. Nonetheless, over half of Americans felt that income-based health care inequalities are unfair, and these respondents were significantly more likely than their compatriots to support major health system reform-differences that reflect the country's political divisions. Given the many provisions in the Affordable Care Act that seek to reduce disparities, any replacement would also require attention to disparities or risk taking a step backward in an area where the United States is in sore need of improvement.
我们考察了 2011 年至 2013 年间 32 个中高收入国家自我评估的个人健康和医疗保健方面的收入差距。虽然在大多数国家,高收入受访者对自己的健康和医疗保健通常更为乐观,但在一些国家,他们与低收入受访者之间的差距比其他国家大得多。在我们研究的每一项指标中,美国的收入相关差异都最大,这些指标既评估了受访者过去的经历,也评估了他们对未来获得所需医疗保健的信心。尽管人们普遍意识到未满足的需求,但对基于收入的医疗保健差距的道德不适感相对较低,这表明美国公众对医疗保健不平等的容忍度高于其他国家。尽管如此,超过一半的美国人认为基于收入的医疗保健不平等是不公平的,这些受访者比他们的同胞更有可能支持重大的医疗体系改革——这种差异反映了美国的政治分歧。鉴于《平价医疗法案》中有许多旨在减少差距的条款,任何替代方案都需要关注差距,否则美国在这一急需改进的领域可能会倒退一步。