Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, UK.
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):260-266. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae004.
With the increasing number of people affected by multiple chronic conditions, it is essential for public-health professionals to promote strategies addressing patient needs for coordinated care. We aim to explore preference heterogeneity for better-coordinated care delivery models in Swiss older adults, and identify profiles of individuals more open to healthcare reforms.
A DCE (discrete choice experiment) survey was developed online and on paper for the Swiss adults aged 50+, following best practice. To elicit preferences, we estimated a latent class model allowing grouping individuals with similar preferences into distinct classes, and examined what background characteristics contributed to specific class membership.
The optimal model identified three classes with different openness to reforms. Class 1 (49%) members were concerned with premium increases and were in favour of integrated care structures with care managed by interprofessional teams. Individuals in class 2 (19%) were younger, open to reforms, and expressed the needs for radical changes within the Swiss healthcare system. Class 3 respondents (32%) were strongly reluctant to changes.
Our study goes beyond average preferences and identifies three distinct population profiles, a majority open to reforms on specific aspects of care delivery, a smallest group in favour radical changes, and a third strongly against changes. Therefore, tailored approaches around healthcare reforms are needed, e.g. explaining the role of interprofessional teams in coordinating care, electronic health records and insurance premium variation.
随着受多种慢性病影响的人数不断增加,公共卫生专业人员必须推广满足患者协调护理需求的策略。我们旨在探讨瑞士老年人群体对更好协调护理提供模式的偏好异质性,并确定更愿意接受医疗改革的人群特征。
遵循最佳实践,我们在线上和纸质版上为 50 岁以上的瑞士成年人开发了 DCE(离散选择实验)调查。为了引出偏好,我们估计了一个潜在类别模型,允许将具有相似偏好的个体分组到不同的类别中,并研究了哪些背景特征有助于特定类别的成员。
最优模型确定了三个对改革开放程度不同的类别。第 1 类(49%)成员对保费增加感到担忧,并赞成由跨专业团队管理的综合护理结构。第 2 类(19%)的个体更年轻,对改革持开放态度,并表达了对瑞士医疗保健系统进行彻底改革的需求。第 3 类受访者(32%)强烈反对改革。
我们的研究超越了平均偏好,确定了三个不同的人群特征,大多数人对护理提供的具体方面的改革持开放态度,一小部分人赞成激进的改革,而第三部分则强烈反对改革。因此,需要围绕医疗改革采取有针对性的方法,例如解释跨专业团队在协调护理、电子健康记录和保险保费变化方面的作用。