• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保险优势计划星级评定与县社会脆弱性

Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and County Social Vulnerability.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York.

Healthcare Coverage and Access, The Commonwealth Fund, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424089. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24089.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24089
PMID:39042405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11267407/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The star rating of a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan is meant to represent plan performance, and it determines the size of quality bonuses. Consumer access to MA plans with a high star rating may vary by the extent of social vulnerability in geographic regions.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between a county's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the star rating of a county's MA plans.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data for all MA plans linked to 2020 county-level SVI data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data were analyzed from March to October 2023.

EXPOSURE

Quintile rank of county based on composite and theme-specific SVI scores, with quartile 1 (Q1) representing the least vulnerable counties and Q5, the most vulnerable counties. The SVI is a multidimensional measure of a county's social vulnerability across 4 themes: socioeconomic status, household characteristics (such as disability, age, and language), racial and ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

County-level mean star rating and the number of MA plans with low-rated (<3.5 stars), high-rated (3.5 or 4.0 stars), and highest-rated (≥4.5 stars) plans.

RESULTS

Across 3075 counties, the median county-level star rating was 4.1 (IQR, 3.9-4.3) in Q1 counties and 3.8 (IQR, 3.6-4.0) in Q5 counties (P < .001). The mean star rating of MA plans was lower (difference, -0.24 points; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.21 points; P < .001), the number of low-rated plans was higher (incidence rate ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.61-2.06; P < .001), and the number of highest-rated plans was lower (incidence rate ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.70-0.81; P < .001) in Q5 counties compared with Q1 counties. Similar patterns were found across theme-specific SVI score quintiles and for 2022 star ratings.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, the most socially vulnerable counties were found to have the fewest highest-rated plans for MA beneficiaries. As MA enrollment grows in socially vulnerable regions, this may exacerbate regional differences in health outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries.

摘要

重要性

医疗保险优势(MA)计划的星级旨在代表计划绩效,它决定了质量奖金的规模。消费者获得星级较高的 MA 计划的机会可能因地理区域的社会脆弱性程度而异。

目的

研究县的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)与该县 MA 计划星级之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了 2023 年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的数据,这些数据与疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)的 2020 年县一级 SVI 数据相关联。数据于 2023 年 3 月至 10 月进行分析。

暴露

根据综合和主题特定 SVI 得分对县进行五分位排名,四分位 1(Q1)代表最脆弱的县,五分位 5(Q5)代表最脆弱的县。SVI 是一个多维度的衡量县在 4 个主题上的社会脆弱性的指标:社会经济地位、家庭特征(如残疾、年龄和语言)、种族和少数民族地位以及住房类型和交通。

主要结果和措施

县一级的平均星级评分和低评级(<3.5 星)、高评级(3.5 或 4.0 星)和最高评级(≥4.5 星)计划的 MA 计划数量。

结果

在 3075 个县中,Q1 县的县一级平均星级评分中位数为 4.1(IQR,3.9-4.3),Q5 县为 3.8(IQR,3.6-4.0)(P<0.001)。MA 计划的平均星级评分较低(差异,-0.24 分;95%CI,-0.28 至-0.21 分;P<0.001),低评级计划数量较高(发病率比,1.81;95%CI,1.61-2.06;P<0.001),最高评级计划数量较低(发病率比,0.75;95%CI,0.70-0.81;P<0.001)在 Q5 县与 Q1 县相比。在特定主题的 SVI 五分位评分和 2022 年的星级评分中也发现了类似的模式。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,发现社会最脆弱的县为 MA 受益人的最高评级计划数量最少。随着 MA 参保人数在社会脆弱地区的增长,这可能会加剧医疗保险受益人的健康结果在地区之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1d/11267407/4364ea184508/jamanetwopen-e2424089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1d/11267407/c1abbe230ab7/jamanetwopen-e2424089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1d/11267407/4364ea184508/jamanetwopen-e2424089-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1d/11267407/c1abbe230ab7/jamanetwopen-e2424089-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee1d/11267407/4364ea184508/jamanetwopen-e2424089-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medicare Advantage Plan Star Ratings and County Social Vulnerability.医疗保险优势计划星级评定与县社会脆弱性
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424089. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24089.
2
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to and enrollment in high-quality Medicare Advantage plans.医疗保险优势计划在获取和参与方面的种族和民族差异。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):303-313. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13977. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
County-Level Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans Offering Expanded Supplemental Benefits.县级医疗保险优势计划的参保情况,这些计划提供了扩展的补充福利。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433972. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33972.
4
Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Quality of Care.医疗保险优势星级评定与医疗质量的种族、民族和社会经济差异的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 11;2(6):e210793. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0793. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.
6
Relationships between Medicare Advantage contract characteristics and quality-of-care ratings: an observational analysis of Medicare Advantage star ratings.医疗保险优势计划合同特征与医疗质量评级之间的关系:对医疗保险优势星级评级的观测性分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3;162(5):353-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-0332.
7
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
8
Quality of Home Health Agencies Serving Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.服务传统 Medicare 与 Medicare Advantage 受益人的家庭保健机构的质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910622. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10622.
9
Comparison of the Quality of Hospitals That Admit Medicare Advantage Patients vs Traditional Medicare Patients.比较收治医疗保险优势计划患者和传统医疗保险患者的医院质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19310.
10
The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.成本和质量信息在医疗保险优势计划参保决策中的作用:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3467-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular Health at the Intersection of Race and Gender in Medicare Fee for Service.医疗保险服务收费中种族与性别的交叉点上的心血管健康
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e253014. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3014.
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Preventive and Chronic Disease Care in Medicare Advantage vs. Traditional Medicare.医疗保险优势计划与传统医疗保险在预防和慢性病护理方面的种族和族裔差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09793-z.
3
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.

本文引用的文献

1
County-Level Social Vulnerability, Metropolitan Status, and Availability of Home Health Services.县级社会脆弱性、大都市地位与家庭健康服务的可及性
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337508. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37508.
2
Association of Community Vulnerability and State Gun Laws With Firearm Deaths in Children and Adolescents Aged 10 to 19 Years.社区脆弱性与州枪支法律对 10 至 19 岁儿童和青少年枪支死亡的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314863. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14863.
3
Assessment of Social Vulnerability in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Care and Prognosis in the United States.
双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
美国儿科头颈部癌症护理和预后的社会脆弱性评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230016. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0016.
4
The social vulnerability metric (SVM) as a new tool for public health.社会脆弱性指标(SVM)作为公共卫生的新工具。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug;58(4):873-881. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14102. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Association of Medicare Advantage Star Ratings With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions.医疗保险优势星级评定与住院治疗门诊护理敏感条件的种族和民族差异之间的关联。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):872-879. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001770. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018.美国 2018 年县级社会脆弱性与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429.
7
Evaluation of Supplemental Benefits Across Medicare Advantage Plans and Beneficiary Demographic Characteristics, 2019 to 2022.2019 至 2022 年期间,医保优势计划和受益人群特征下补充福利的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233020. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33020.
8
Disparities in Health Care Spending and Utilization Among Black and White Medicaid Enrollees.黑人和白人医疗补助受助人之间的医疗保健支出和利用差距。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 10;3(6):e221398. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1398. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Geographical Variation in Health Spending Across the US Among Privately Insured Individuals and Enrollees in Medicaid and Medicare.美国私人保险个人和医疗补助及医疗保险参保者的健康支出的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222138. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22138.
10
State-Level Social Vulnerability Index and Healthcare Access: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey.州级社会脆弱性指数与医疗保健可及性:行为风险因素监测系统调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Sep;63(3):403-409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Apr 30.