Mojarad Niloofar, Khalili Zahra, Aalaei Shima
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
General Dentist Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2017 Mar-Apr;14(2):131-136.
Poor denture hygiene can be a potential source of pathogens. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of microwave radiation with that of chemical and mechanical techniques in disinfecting complete dentures contaminated with and .
Seventy-two sterilized mandibular dentures were separately contaminated with ( = 32) and ( = 32) and then incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The contaminated dentures were disinfected as follows: chemical disinfection with Corega tablets; chemical disinfection with 2% glutaraldehyde; mechanical disinfection by brushing the denture; and physical disinfection by 650-W microwaves irradiation for 3 min with six samples in each subgroup. Six dentures served as negative control group, and six contaminated dentures with no disinfection served as the positive control group. 10-10 dilutions were cultured in the nutrient agar, and the colonies were counted after incubation at 37°C for 48 h. To evaluate the lasting time of disinfection, the containers with nutrient agar and dentures were stored for 7 days at 37°C to evaluate turbidity. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-test (α = 0.05).
There was no evidence of bacterial growth in 48 h and turbidity after 7 days of incubation of dentures disinfected by microwaves, glutaraldehyde, and Corega tablets, which was statistically significant compared to the positive controls ( < 0.001). In mechanically disinfected dentures (brushing), bacterial growth was detected after 48 h which was statistically significant compared to the positive controls ( < 0.001) and turbidity was seen in all the nutrient agar plates.
Microwave iradiation, 2% glutaraldehyde, and Corega tablets disinfected complete dentures contaminated with and which lasted for a long and a short terms.
义齿卫生状况差可能是病原体的潜在来源。本研究的目的是比较微波辐射与化学和机械技术对被[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]污染的全口义齿进行消毒的效果。
72副消毒后的下颌义齿分别被[具体细菌名称1](n = 32)和[具体细菌名称2](n = 32)污染,然后在37°C下孵育48小时。对污染的义齿进行如下消毒:用Corega片剂进行化学消毒;用2%戊二醛进行化学消毒;通过刷洗义齿进行机械消毒;以及用650瓦微波辐射3分钟进行物理消毒,每个亚组有6个样本。6副义齿作为阴性对照组,6副未消毒的污染义齿作为阳性对照组。将10-10稀释液接种在营养琼脂中,在37°C孵育48小时后计数菌落。为评估消毒的持续时间,将装有营养琼脂和义齿的容器在37°C下储存7天以评估浑浊度。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验(α = 0.05)分析数据。
经微波、戊二醛和Corega片剂消毒的义齿在孵育48小时后没有细菌生长迹象,孵育7天后也没有浑浊,与阳性对照组相比具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。在机械消毒(刷洗)的义齿中,48小时后检测到细菌生长,与阳性对照组相比具有统计学意义(P < 0.001),并且在所有营养琼脂平板中都观察到浑浊。
微波辐射、2%戊二醛和Corega片剂对被[具体细菌名称1]和[具体细菌名称2]污染的全口义齿进行了消毒,消毒效果在短期和长期均有效。