Galappathie Nuwan, Khan Sobia Tamim, Hussain Amina
St Andrew's Healthcare, Birmingham, UK.
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Jun;41(3):156-159. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.052910.
To evaluate differences between male patients in secure psychiatric settings in the UK based on whether they are detained under civil or forensic sections of the Mental Health Act 1983. A cohort of patients discharged from a secure psychiatric hospital were evaluated for length of stay and frequency of risk-related incidents. Overall, 84 patients were included in the study: 52 in the forensic group and 32 in the civil group. Civil patients had more frequent incidents of aggression, sex offending, fire-setting and vulnerability, whereas forensic patients had more frequent episodes of self-harm. Secure hospitals should ensure treatment programmes are tailored to each patient's needs. Civil patients require greater emphasis on treatment of their mental illness, whereas forensic patients have additional offence-related treatment needs. Regular liaison between forensic and general adult services is essential to help ensure patients can return to appropriate settings at the earliest opportunity in their recovery.
为评估英国安全精神病环境下男性患者之间的差异,具体依据他们是依据1983年《精神健康法》的民事还是法医条款被拘留。对一批从安全精神病医院出院的患者进行了住院时长和与风险相关事件发生频率的评估。总体而言,84名患者被纳入研究:法医组52名,民事组32名。民事患者发生攻击、性犯罪、纵火和脆弱行为的事件更为频繁,而法医患者的自我伤害事件更为频繁。安全医院应确保治疗方案根据每位患者的需求进行调整。民事患者需要更加强调对其精神疾病的治疗,而法医患者有与犯罪相关的额外治疗需求。法医服务与普通成人服务之间的定期联络对于帮助确保患者在康复过程中尽早回到合适的环境至关重要。