Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Forensicare, Fairfield, Victoria, Australia.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Jun;29(3):418-429. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12827. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: The Safewards model has been introduced to forensic mental health wards with mixed results. Research has identified a need to consider the addition of factors that may be relevant to forensic mental health services to enhance the introduction of Safewards. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This study elicits factors specific to forensic mental health settings missing from the original Safewards model, which have the potential to enhance nursing care, improve safety and improve adherence to Safewards in a forensic mental health setting. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: This study provides the adaptation required in a forensic mental health setting to enhance the implementation of the Safewards model of care, originally developed to assist nurses to prevent and manage conflict and containment in acute general mental health settings. The development of Safewards Secure has incorporated perspectives from expert Safewards and forensic mental health nurse leaders and healthcare clinicians and is inclusive of consumer and carer perspectives to ensure the model is applicable and broadly acceptable. ABSTRACT: Introduction Safewards is a model designed specifically for acute mental inpatient wards. Research investigating the introduction of Safewards has identified a need to consider factors relevant in forensic mental health services, such as offence and risk issues. Aim To identify adaptations needed to address gaps in the Safewards model to assist forensic mental health nurses to prevent and manage conflict and containment. Method A Delphi study was employed to engage a group of international Safewards and forensic mental health experts (n = 19), to elucidate adaptation of the Safewards model. Results Experts identified necessary elements and reached consensus on key considerations for Safewards interventions. To ensure the Safewards Secure model was robust and developed on a platform of research, all items suggested by Delphi experts were cross-referenced and dependent on empirical evidence in the literature. Discussion This study identified a number of key differences between civil and forensic mental health services, which informed the development of Safewards Secure, an adjunct to the original Safewards model. Implications for Practice The development of person-centred models of nursing care adapted to specific settings, such as forensic mental health, provides a potential solution to preventing and managing conflict and containment, and improving consumer outcomes. Relevance Statement Managing conflict and containment in mental health services remains an ongoing challenge for mental health nurses. Safewards is a model of care designed for acute mental health inpatient settings to prevent conflict and containment. To date, there has been mixed results when introducing Safewards in forensic mental health settings, and reported reluctance and scepticism. To address these issues, this study employed a Delphi design to elicit possible adaptions to the original Safewards model. From this study, Safewards Secure was developed with adaptations designed for forensic services, to enhance the management of conflict and containment, assist implementation and improve consumer outcomes.
Safewards 模型已引入法医精神病病房,但结果喜忧参半。研究表明,需要考虑可能与法医精神病服务相关的因素,以增强 Safewards 的引入。本文的新发现:这项研究提出了法医精神病健康环境中原始 Safewards 模型中缺失的特定因素,这些因素有可能增强护理、提高安全性,并在法医精神病环境中提高对 Safewards 的依从性。对实践的影响:这项研究提供了在法医精神病环境中增强 Safewards 护理模式实施所需的适应性,该模式最初是为了帮助护士预防和管理急性一般心理健康环境中的冲突和遏制。 Safewards Secure 的开发结合了 Safewards 专家和法医精神病学护士领导以及医疗保健临床医生的观点,并包含了消费者和照顾者的观点,以确保模型适用且广泛可接受。 摘要:介绍 Safewards 是专为急性精神住院病房设计的模型。调查 Safewards 引入情况的研究表明,需要考虑与法医精神病服务相关的因素,例如犯罪和风险问题。目的:确定需要进行哪些调整,以弥补 Safewards 模型中的差距,帮助法医精神病科护士预防和管理冲突和遏制。方法:采用德尔菲法(Delphi method)聘请了一组国际 Safewards 和法医精神病学专家(n=19),以阐明 Safewards 模型的调整。结果:专家确定了必要的要素,并就 Safewards 干预的关键考虑因素达成共识。为了确保 Safewards Secure 模型稳健并建立在研究平台上,所有由 Delphi 专家建议的项目都与文献中的实证证据进行了交叉参考和依赖。讨论:这项研究确定了民事和法医精神病服务之间的一些关键差异,这些差异为 Safewards Secure 的发展提供了信息, Safewards Secure 是原始 Safewards 模型的一个补充。对实践的影响:为特定环境(如法医精神病学)量身定制以人为主导的护理模式,为预防和管理冲突和遏制以及改善消费者结果提供了一种潜在的解决方案。相关性声明:在精神卫生服务中管理冲突和遏制仍然是精神科护士面临的持续挑战。 Safewards 是一种专为急性心理健康住院环境设计的护理模式,用于预防冲突和遏制。迄今为止,在法医精神病学环境中引入 Safewards 的结果喜忧参半,据报道,相关人员表现出不情愿和怀疑态度。为了解决这些问题,本研究采用 Delphi 设计来征求对原始 Safewards 模型的可能调整。从这项研究中, Safewards Secure 发展起来了,它具有专为法医服务设计的适应性,以增强冲突和遏制的管理,协助实施并改善消费者的结果。