• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从未有过?潜逃或逃脱患者的特征、结局及动机:对两个中等及低安全级别的法医单位5年期间逃脱和潜逃情况的回顾。

Never ever? Characteristics, outcomes and motivations of patients who abscond or escape: A 5-year review of escapes and absconds from two medium and low secure forensic units.

作者信息

Mezey Gillian, Durkin Catherine, Dodge Liam, White Sarah

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, St Georges University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, United Kingdom.

Shaftesbury Clinic, Glenburnie Road, London, SW17 7DJ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Dec;25(5):440-50. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1982. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1002/cbm.1982
PMID:26464338
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Absconds and escapes by psychiatric patients from secure forensic psychiatric settings create public anxiety and are poorly understood.

AIMS

To describe secure hospital patients who escape from within the secure perimeter or abscond, and test for differences between these groups.

METHOD

Escapes and absconds between 2008 and 2012 from the medium and low secure forensic psychiatric inpatient units of two London National Health Service Trusts were identified through the Trusts' databases. Demographic, offending, mental health and incident data were extracted from records for each.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven incidents, involving 54 patients, were identified over the five years. These were 13 escapes involving 12 patients, representing a rate of 0.04 per 1000 bed days, and 64 absconds involving 42 patients, a rate of 0.26 per 1000 bed days; 15 (28%) patients were absent without leave more than once. Over half of the patients came back voluntarily within 24 hours of leaving. Over 50% of them had drunk alcohol or taken drugs while away from the unit. Escapees were more likely to be transferred prisoners and to have planned their escape, less likely to return to the unit voluntarily and away longer than patients who absconded. Offending was rare during unauthorised leave--just three offences among the 77 incidents; self-harm was more likely. Motives for absconding included: wanting freedom or drink or drugs, family worries and/or dissatisfaction with aspects of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Escapes or absconding from secure healthcare units have different characteristics, but may best be prevented by convergent strategies. Relational security is likely to be as important for foiling plans for the former as it is for reducing boredom, building strong family support and managing substance misuse in the latter.

摘要

背景

精神病患者从安全的法医精神病学机构潜逃和逃脱会引发公众焦虑,且人们对此了解甚少。

目的

描述从安全区域内逃脱或潜逃的安全医院患者,并测试这些群体之间的差异。

方法

通过两个伦敦国民保健服务信托基金的数据库,确定了2008年至2012年期间从中等和低安全级别的法医精神病住院单元逃脱和潜逃的情况。从每个记录中提取人口统计学、犯罪、心理健康和事件数据。

结果

在这五年中,共确定了77起事件,涉及54名患者。其中13起逃脱事件涉及12名患者,发生率为每1000个床日0.04起;64起潜逃事件涉及42名患者,发生率为每1000个床日0.26起;15名(28%)患者未经请假离开超过一次。超过一半的患者在离开后24小时内自愿返回。超过50%的患者在离开病房期间饮酒或吸毒。逃脱者更有可能是被转移的囚犯,并且有逃脱计划,比潜逃患者更不可能自愿返回病房,离开时间也更长。在未经授权离开期间犯罪情况很少——77起事件中只有3起犯罪;自残的可能性更大。潜逃的动机包括:想要自由、饮酒或吸毒、家庭担忧和/或对治疗方面的不满。

结论

从安全医疗单位逃脱或潜逃具有不同的特点,但可能最好通过综合策略来预防。关系安全对于挫败前者的计划可能与减少后者的无聊感、建立强大的家庭支持和管理药物滥用一样重要。

相似文献

1
Never ever? Characteristics, outcomes and motivations of patients who abscond or escape: A 5-year review of escapes and absconds from two medium and low secure forensic units.从未有过?潜逃或逃脱患者的特征、结局及动机:对两个中等及低安全级别的法医单位5年期间逃脱和潜逃情况的回顾。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Dec;25(5):440-50. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1982. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
2
Hospital break. An eight-year review of escapes and absconds from two high security forensic centers.医院逃亡事件。对两家高度安全法医中心的 8 年逃亡和逃跑事件的回顾。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2023 May-Jun;88:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2023.101886. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
3
Characteristics and motivations of absconders from forensic mental health services: a case-control study.法医精神卫生服务机构潜逃者的特征与动机:一项病例对照研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 27;14:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-91.
4
Absconding: how and when patients leave the ward.擅自离开:患者离开病房的方式和时间。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Jun;6(3):207-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.630207.x.
5
A prospective study of patients absconding from a psychiatric hospital in Iran.一项关于伊朗一家精神病医院患者潜逃情况的前瞻性研究。
Med Glas (Zenica). 2012 Aug;9(2):345-9.
6
Five-year review of absconding in three acute psychiatric inpatient wards in Australia.澳大利亚三家急性精神病住院病房五年逃犯研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Feb;24(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/inm.12100. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
7
Absconding: outcome and risk.潜逃:结果与风险。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Jun;6(3):213-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.630213.x.
8
The relationship between building design and escapes from secure units.
J R Soc Promot Health. 1999 Sep;119(3):170-4. doi: 10.1177/146642409911900307.
9
Absconding: nurses views and reactions.擅离职守:护士的观点与反应
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Jun;6(3):219-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.630219.x.
10
Epidemiology of absconding from an Iranian psychiatric centre.伊朗一家精神病中心的患者逃跑流行病学情况。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Mar;16(2):153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01350.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedural justice and forensic mental health: An introduction and future directions.程序公正与法医心理健康:引言与未来方向。
Med Sci Law. 2024 Apr;64(2):157-163. doi: 10.1177/00258024231206865. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Absconding from an Open-Door, No-Restraint Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: A Single-Center Study in Italy.开放式、无约束住院精神科病房患者出走的患病率及危险因素:意大利一项单中心研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;13(1):58. doi: 10.3390/bs13010058.
3
Escape and absconding among offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorder - an explorative analysis of characteristics.
精神分裂谱系障碍罪犯的逃脱和潜逃——特征的探索性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03117-1.
4
Legal and Ethical Aspects of Mental Health Care.精神卫生保健的法律与伦理问题
Indian J Psychol Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;41(2):108-112. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_59_19.