• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗和加拿大护理学博士项目:一项质性研究。

PhD programs in nursing in Iran and Canada: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Moonaghi Hossien Karimi, Valizadehzare Najmeh, Khorashadizadeh Fatemeh

机构信息

Evidence-Based Caring Research Center, Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, & Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine.

Evidence Based Care Research Center, Department of Operating Room, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Jun;67(6):863-868.

PMID:28585583
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare doctoral programmes of nursing in Iran and Canada.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted in Mashhad, Iran, in April 2014. It was based on Beredy's model, including description, interpretation, juxtaposition and comparison. The validity of the related documents was assessed by internal validity, importance and accuracy of documents. Critique on the external validity and core of documents were reviewed. Then, they were interpreted, juxtaposed and compared.

RESULTS

Both the countries had significant differences in fundamental elements of their curricula, including mission, vision, aim, objectives, roles and tasks of graduates. Consequently, academic units, final comprehensive exam, and research courses were also different.

CONCLUSIONS

Doctoral programmes in Canada focussed on competency-based, community-based, task-based and student-centred approaches. These approaches were ignored in the Iranian curriculum.

摘要

目的

比较伊朗和加拿大的护理学博士项目。

方法

2014年4月在伊朗马什哈德开展了这项定性研究。该研究基于贝雷迪模型,包括描述、解释、并列和比较。通过文件的内部有效性、重要性和准确性评估相关文件的有效性。审查了文件外部有效性和核心的批判性评价。然后,对它们进行解释、并列和比较。

结果

两国在课程的基本要素方面存在显著差异,包括使命、愿景、目标、目的、毕业生的角色和任务。因此,学术单位、最终综合考试和研究课程也有所不同。

结论

加拿大的博士项目侧重于基于能力、基于社区、基于任务和以学生为中心的方法。伊朗的课程中忽略了这些方法。

相似文献

1
PhD programs in nursing in Iran and Canada: A qualitative study.伊朗和加拿大护理学博士项目:一项质性研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Jun;67(6):863-868.
2
Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study.韩国护理博士教育的师资、学生、课程和资源质量:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
3
Research focused doctoral nursing education in the 21st century: Curriculum, evaluation, and postdoctoral considerations.21世纪以研究为重点的博士护理教育:课程、评估及博士后考量
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Jan-Feb;44:38-53. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
4
Development of Quantitative Research Skills Competencies to Improve Doctor of Philosophy Nursing Student Training.培养定量研究技能能力以改进护理学博士生培训。
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Aug 1;57(8):483-488. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180720-06.
5
Comparative study of nursing curriculum in nursing faculties of Canada, Turkey, and Iran according to SPICES model.根据SPICES模型对加拿大、土耳其和伊朗护理学院护理课程的比较研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:120. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_392_18. eCollection 2019.
6
PhD nursing students' changing needs relative to the comprehensive doctoral examination.护理博士生相对于综合博士考试的不断变化的需求。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jan;50:102917. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102917. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Comparative study of the undergraduate community-based nursing curriculum in Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences, school of nursing and linfield school of nursing.设拉子医科大学护理学院与林菲尔德护理学院本科社区护理课程的比较研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Jul 5;13:194. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_56_23. eCollection 2024.
8
A comparative study of the curriculum in master degree of medical education in Iran and some selected countries.伊朗与部分选定国家医学教育硕士学位课程的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 30;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04366-2.
9
Educating Nursing Scientists: Integrating Genetics and Genomics into PhD Curricula.培养护理科学家:将遗传学和基因组学融入博士课程
J Prof Nurs. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Global quality criteria, standards, and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing; literature review and guideline development.护理学博士项目的全球质量标准、准则及指标;文献综述与指南制定
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):477-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.003. Epub 2005 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study of infection prevention and control curricula in nursing master's degree programs worldwide, with practical suggestions for Iran.全球护理硕士学位项目中感染预防与控制课程的比较研究及对伊朗的实用建议
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Feb 28;14:71. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1723_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of Iran's nursing education with developed and developing countries: a review on descriptive-comparative studies.伊朗护理教育与发达国家和发展中国家的比较:描述性比较研究综述
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 6;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00861-x.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of postgraduate nursing student academic satisfaction scale.
研究生护生学业满意度量表的编制及心理测量学评价。
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1145-1156. doi: 10.1002/nop2.727. Epub 2020 Dec 3.