• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉-亚洲型治疗老年原发性骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折的比较

INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.

作者信息

Zhang Hui, Zeng Xianshang, Zhang Nan, Zeng Dan, Xu Ping, Zhang Lili, Chen Deng, Yu Weiguang, Zhang Xinchao

机构信息

1 Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

2 Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Huangpu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2017 Aug;45(4):1297-1309. doi: 10.1177/0300060517710584. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/0300060517710584
PMID:28587540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5625524/
Abstract

Objectives To compare the long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of the proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia (PFNA-II) and INTERTAN nail (IT) in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFFs) (AO/OTA Type 31A1.1-A2.3) in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis. Methods A retrospective comparative study was performed in our institution. From January 2009 to March 2012, 243 patients with osteoporosis (243 hips) with IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1.1-A2.3) underwent repair with either a PFNA-II or IT. Follow-up assessments were performed 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively and every year thereafter. All implant position changes were noted. Patient-related functional outcomes were evaluated based on the Harris hip score. Results In total, 174 patients with osteoporosis (IT, n = 86; PFNA-II, n = 88) were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 40 months (range, 38-60 months). An increased risk of femoral shaft fracture after implant removal was observed at month 9 of follow-up in 0.0% and 4.4% of the IT and PFNA-II groups, respectively. This difference remained over time with rates of 1.1% and 6.8%, respectively, at the last follow-up. Conclusion The IT nail appears to be a reliable implant in the management of IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1.1-A2.3) in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.

摘要

目的 比较股骨近端防旋髓内钉亚洲版(PFNA-II)与INTERTAN髓内钉(IT)治疗老年原发性骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折(IFFs,AO/OTA 31A1.1-A2.3型)的长期功能和影像学结果。方法 在我们机构进行了一项回顾性比较研究。2009年1月至2012年3月,243例患有骨质疏松症(243髋)的IFFs(AO/OTA 3.1A1.1-A2.3型)患者接受了PFNA-II或IT治疗。术后1、3、6、9和12个月以及此后每年进行随访评估。记录所有植入物位置变化。基于Harris髋关节评分评估患者相关功能结果。结果 总共174例骨质疏松症患者(IT组,n = 86;PFNA-II组,n = 88)在平均40个月(范围38 - 60个月)的随访期内接受了评估。随访第9个月时,IT组和PFNA-II组分别有0.0%和4.4%的患者在取出植入物后发生股骨干骨折风险增加。随着时间推移,这种差异仍然存在,末次随访时发生率分别为1.1%和6.8%。结论 IT髓内钉似乎是治疗老年原发性骨质疏松性IFFs(AO/OTA 3.1A1.1-A2.3型)的可靠植入物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56cb/5625524/041ca9b9f63e/10.1177_0300060517710584-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56cb/5625524/5d2db88bab98/10.1177_0300060517710584-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56cb/5625524/041ca9b9f63e/10.1177_0300060517710584-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56cb/5625524/5d2db88bab98/10.1177_0300060517710584-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56cb/5625524/041ca9b9f63e/10.1177_0300060517710584-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
INTERTAN nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation-Asia for intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients with primary osteoporosis.InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉-亚洲型治疗老年原发性骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折的比较
J Int Med Res. 2017 Aug;45(4):1297-1309. doi: 10.1177/0300060517710584. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
2
A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: a minimum follow-up of 3 years.InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉治疗老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折的回顾性分析:至少3年随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Oct 10;12(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0648-2.
3
The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients.亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉与标准股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗中国老年患者不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus dynamic hip screw fixation for treatment of osteoporotic type 31-A1 intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉固定治疗老年骨质疏松性31-A1型股骨转子间骨折
J Int Med Res. 2017 Jun;45(3):1109-1123. doi: 10.1177/0300060517703277. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
5
Optimizing stability in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fracture fixation in older patients with osteoporosis.优化老年骨质疏松患者AO/OTA 31 - A2型转子间骨折固定的稳定性
J Int Med Res. 2018 May;46(5):1767-1778. doi: 10.1177/0300060518761504. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
6
Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up.股骨近端抗旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗稳定型股骨转子间骨折的疗效分析:至少4年随访结果
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 May 21;17:222. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7.
7
[Comparison of PFNA and InterTAN intramedullary nail in treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures].PFNA与InterTAN髓内钉治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Jul 25;30(7):597-601. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.07.003.
8
Conversion to total hip arthroplasty after failed proximal femoral nail antirotations or dynamic hip screw fixations for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: a retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.股骨近端防旋髓内钉或动力髋螺钉固定稳定型股骨转子间骨折失败后改行全髋关节置换术:一项至少随访3年的回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1415-6.
9
A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉亚洲版治疗老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 15;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0344-7.
10
Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures.股骨近端仿生钉(PFBN)与股骨近端防旋髓内钉和 InterTan 治疗股骨转子间骨折的有限元分析
Orthop Surg. 2022 Sep;14(9):2245-2255. doi: 10.1111/os.13247. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective Analysis of Asian Type 2 Integrated Lag Screws (Hip Fracture Nail) in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures.亚洲型2代一体式拉力螺钉(髋部骨折钉)治疗股骨转子间骨折患者的前瞻性分析
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(4):599-606. doi: 10.4055/cios25032. Epub 2025 Jul 15.
2
Screening risk factors for the occurrence of wedge effects in intramedullary nail fixation for intertrochanteric fractures in older people via machine learning and constructing a prediction model: a retrospective study.通过机器学习筛查老年人股骨转子间骨折髓内钉固定中楔形效应发生的危险因素并构建预测模型:一项回顾性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08619-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly.InterTan钉与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉亚洲版治疗老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jan 15;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0344-7.
2
Variations of treatment in selected proximal femur fractures among surgeons with different surgical experience--A survey at an international AO course.不同手术经验的外科医生对选定的股骨近端骨折治疗方法的差异——在一次国际AO课程上的调查
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.066. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
3
Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus InterTan nail for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
股骨近端防旋髓内钉与 InterTan 钉治疗股骨转子间骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 9;19(7):e0304654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304654. eCollection 2024.
4
Neglected Posterior Dislocation Hip Post Acetabulum Fixation: Case Report.髋臼固定术后被忽视的髋关节后脱位:病例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2024 Jun;14(6):68-72. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i06.4506.
5
Complication rates after proximal femoral nailing: does level of training matter?股骨近端髓内钉固定术后并发症发生率:培训水平是否重要?
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Nov 3;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00737-z.
6
Dual-screw versus single-screw cephalomedullary nails for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双螺杆与单螺杆股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 20;18(1):607. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04103-x.
7
A comparison of functional and radiological outcome of combine compression antegrade intertrochanteric nail (InterTan) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation II (PFNA-II) in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.老年股骨转子间骨折患者中联合加压顺行股骨转子间髓内钉(InterTan)与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉II(PFNA-II)功能和影像学结果的比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Jan-Feb;39(1):96-100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.1.6946.
8
Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?股骨近端髓内钉的匹配程度是否会影响转子间骨折的再次手术率?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Dec 29;17(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03476-9.
9
The predictive value of the Singh index for the risk of InterTAN intramedullary fixation failure in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.辛格指数对老年股骨转子间骨折患者 InterTAN 髓内固定失败风险的预测价值。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 12;23(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05741-8.
10
Treatment of Elderly Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture by InterTan Intramedullary Nail and PFNA.InterTan髓内钉与PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 31;2022:5020960. doi: 10.1155/2022/5020960. eCollection 2022.
Comparison of the reconstruction trochanteric antigrade nail (TAN) with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures.
重建型股骨转子顺行髓内钉(TAN)与股骨近端抗旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗反斜行转子间髋部骨折的比较
Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Short-term results of surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for basicervical proximal femoral fractures.使用股骨近端髓内钉治疗股骨近端基底部骨折的短期手术效果
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):427-34.
5
Outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated by intramedullary nail with two integrated lag screws: A study in Asian population.采用带两枚一体式拉力螺钉的髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效:一项针对亚洲人群的研究。
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;49(4):436-41. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.159647.
6
Which Fixation Device is Preferred for Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures in the United States? A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.在美国,哪种固定装置更适合用于股骨转子间髋部骨折的手术治疗?一项针对骨科医生的调查。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3647-55. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4469-5. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
7
Do PFNA devices and Intertan nails both have the same effects in the treatment of trochanteric fractures? A prospective clinical study.PFNA器械和Intertan髓内钉在治疗转子间骨折方面效果相同吗?一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2015 Nov;20(6):1053-61. doi: 10.1007/s00776-015-0750-4. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Trends in the management of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the United States 2005-2011.2005 - 2011年美国股骨转子间骨折的治疗趋势
Hip Int. 2015 May-Jun;25(3):270-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000216. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients.亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉与标准股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗中国老年患者不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的比较
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):143-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
10
Functional recovery of elderly patients with surgically-treated intertrochanteric fractures: preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail techniques.手术治疗股骨转子间骨折老年患者的功能恢复:比较动力髋螺钉和股骨近端髓内钉技术的随机试验初步结果
Injury. 2014 Nov;45 Suppl 5:S26-31. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70017-8.