Department of Orthopaedics, General Medical 300 Hospital, Guiyang, 550004, China.
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Cell Engineering and Biomedicine, Guiyang, 550004, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 12;23(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05741-8.
To investigate the predictive value of the Singh index for the risk of InterTAN intramedullary fixation failure in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture to guide clinical treatment.
A total of 360 patients were divided into the Singh (I ~ II) (n = 120), Singh (III ~ IV) (n = 120) and Singh (V ~ VI) (n = 120) groups. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris scores were recorded at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the operation. The correlation between the Singh index and the T-score of the total hip and femoral neck was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between the Singh index and internal fixation failure; the types of internal fixation failure were also analyzed.
The Harris scores of the Singh (I ~ II) group were lower than those of the Singh (III ~ IV) and Singh (V ~ VI) groups 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The Singh index was significantly correlated with the T-score of the total hip and femoral neck (P = 0.00, r = 0.89; P = 0.00, r = 0.83). The Singh (I ~ II) group had the lowest internal fixation survival rate within 24 months (P = 0.01). The Singh index was an independent predictor of internal fixation failure (P < 0.05). Lag screw cutting-out was the main type of internal fixation failure in the three groups (P = 0.00).
The Singh index is significantly correlated with the bone mineral density of the femoral neck and total hip. The Singh (I ~ II) group had lower Harris scores and a lower internal fixation survival rate than the other two groups. The Singh index is an independent predictor of internal fixation failure, especially lag screw cutting-out, after InterTAN fixation.
为了研究 Singh 指数对老年股骨转子间骨折患者 InterTAN 髓内固定失败风险的预测价值,指导临床治疗。
将 360 例患者分为 Singh(III)(n=120)、Singh(IIIIV)(n=120)和 Singh(V~VI)(n=120)组。记录术后 1、6、12、18 和 24 个月的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Harris 评分。分析 Singh 指数与全髋关节和股骨颈 T 评分的相关性。采用 logistic 回归分析 Singh 指数与内固定失败的关系;分析内固定失败的类型。
术后 12、18 和 24 个月,Singh(III)组的 Harris 评分均低于 Singh(IIIIV)组和 Singh(VVI)组(P<0.05)。Singh 指数与全髋关节和股骨颈 T 评分显著相关(P=0.00,r=0.89;P=0.00,r=0.83)。24 个月内 Singh(III)组内固定生存率最低(P=0.01)。Singh 指数是内固定失败的独立预测因子(P<0.05)。三组中,螺钉切出是内固定失败的主要类型(P=0.00)。
Singh 指数与股骨颈和全髋关节的骨密度显著相关。与其他两组相比,Singh(I~II)组的 Harris 评分较低,内固定生存率较低。Singh 指数是 InterTAN 固定后内固定失败的独立预测因子,尤其是螺钉切出。