Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Room F4-132, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Oct;36(10):1853-1858. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3001-0. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
The utility of performing blood cultures in patients with a suspected skin infection is debated. We investigated the association between blood culture positivity rates and patients' clinical condition, including acute disease severity and comorbidity. We performed a retrospective study, including patients with cellulitis and wound infection who had been enrolled in three Dutch multicenter studies between 2011 and 2015. Patients' acute clinical condition was assessed using the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS; severe: MEWS ≥2) and comorbidity with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; severe: CCI ≥2). A total of 334 patients with a suspected skin infection were included. Blood cultures were performed in 175 patients (52%), 28 of whom (16%) had a positive blood culture. Data on the clinical condition were collected in 275 patients. Blood cultures were performed in 76% of the patients with a severe acute condition, compared with 48% with a non-severe acute condition (OR 3.5; 95% confidence interval: 2.0-6.2; p < 0.001). Blood cultures were positive in 18% and 12% respectively (OR 1.7 (0.7-4.1); p = 0.3). Blood cultures were performed in 53% of patients with severe comorbidity, compared with 61% without severe comorbidity (OR 0.7; 0.4-1.2; p = 0.2). Blood cultures were positive in 25% and 10% respectively (OR = 3.1; 1.2-7.5; p = 0.02). The blood culture positivity rate among hospitalized patients diagnosed with skin infections was higher than the rates reported by the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, particularly in patients with severe comorbidity. Therefore, the recommendations concerning blood culture performance in patients with a skin infection should be reconsidered.
怀疑患有皮肤感染的患者进行血培养的效用存在争议。我们研究了血培养阳性率与患者临床状况之间的关系,包括急性疾病严重程度和合并症。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2011 年至 2015 年间在荷兰三个多中心研究中确诊为蜂窝织炎和伤口感染的患者。使用改良早期预警评分(MEWS;严重:MEWS≥2)评估患者的急性临床状况,使用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI;严重:CCI≥2)评估合并症。共纳入 334 例疑似皮肤感染患者。175 例(52%)患者进行了血培养,其中 28 例(16%)血培养阳性。275 例患者的临床状况数据。严重急性疾病患者中进行血培养的比例为 76%,而非严重急性疾病患者为 48%(OR 3.5;95%置信区间:2.0-6.2;p<0.001)。血培养阳性率分别为 18%和 12%(OR 1.7(0.7-4.1);p=0.3)。严重合并症患者中进行血培养的比例为 53%,而非严重合并症患者为 61%(OR 0.7;0.4-1.2;p=0.2)。血培养阳性率分别为 25%和 10%(OR=3.1;1.2-7.5;p=0.02)。诊断为皮肤感染的住院患者血培养阳性率高于美国传染病学会指南报告的阳性率,尤其是在严重合并症患者中。因此,应重新考虑关于皮肤感染患者进行血培养的建议。