Abroug Fekri, Ouanes-Besbes Lamia, Hammouda Zeineb, Benabidallah Saoussen, Dachraoui Fahmi, Ouanes Islem, Jolliet Philippe
Intensive Care Unit, CHU Fatouma Bourguiba, Research Laboratory LR12SP15, University of Monastir, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia.
Département des Centres Interdisciplinaires et de Logistique Médicale, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0273-6. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
When used as a driving gas during NIV in hypercapnic COPD exacerbation, a helium-oxygen (He/O) mixture reduces the work of breathing and gas trapping. The potential for He/O to reduce the rate of NIV failure leading to intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation has been evaluated in several RCTs. The goal of this meta-analysis is to assess the effect of NIV driven by He/O compared to air/O on patient-centered outcomes in hypercapnic COPD exacerbation. Relevant RCTs were searched using standard procedures. The main endpoint was the rate of NIV failure. The effect size was computed by a fixed-effect model, and estimated as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Additional endpoints were ICU mortality, NIV-related side effects, and the length and costs of ICU stay. Three RCTs fulfilled the selection criteria and enrolled a total of 772 patients (386 patients received He/O and 386 received air/O). Pooled analysis showed no difference in the rate of NIV failure when using He/O mixture compared to air/O: 17 vs 19.7%, respectively; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.22; p = 0.36; I for heterogeneity = 0%, and no publication bias. ICU mortality was also not different: OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.45-1.4; p = 0.43; I = 5%. However, He/O was associated with less NIV-related adverse events (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, p = 0.001), and a shorter length of ICU stay (difference in means = -1.07 day, 95% CI -2.14 to -0.004, p = 0.049). Total hospital costs entailed by hospital stay and NIV gas were not different: difference in means = -279$, 95% CI -2052-1493, p = 0.76. Compared to air/O, He/O does not reduce the rate of NIV failure in hypercapnic COPD exacerbation. It is, however, associated with a lower incidence of NIV-related adverse events and a shortening of ICU length of stay with no increase in hospital costs.
在高碳酸血症型慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期无创通气(NIV)过程中用作驱动气体时,氦氧(He/O)混合气体可减少呼吸功和气体潴留。多项随机对照试验(RCT)评估了He/O降低导致气管插管和有创机械通气的NIV失败率的可能性。本荟萃分析的目的是评估与空气/O相比,He/O驱动的NIV对高碳酸血症型COPD急性加重期以患者为中心的结局的影响。采用标准程序检索相关RCT。主要终点是NIV失败率。效应量通过固定效应模型计算,并以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)进行估计。其他终点包括重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率、NIV相关副作用以及ICU住院时间和费用。三项RCT符合入选标准,共纳入772例患者(386例接受He/O,386例接受空气/O)。汇总分析显示,与空气/O相比,使用He/O混合气体时NIV失败率无差异:分别为17%和19.7%;OR为0.84,95%CI为0.58 - 1.22;p = 0.36;异质性I² = 0%,且无发表偏倚。ICU死亡率也无差异:OR为0.8,95%CI为0.45 - 1.4;p = 0.43;I² = 5%。然而,He/O与较少的NIV相关不良事件相关(OR为0.56,95%CI为0.4 - 0.8,p = 0.001),且ICU住院时间较短(均值差异 = -1.07天,95%CI为 -2.14至 -0.004,p = 从全文来看这里应该是0.049)。住院和NIV气体产生的总住院费用无差异:均值差异 = -279美元,95%CI为 -2052至1493,p = 0.76。与空气/O相比,He/O不能降低高碳酸血症型COPD急性加重期的NIV失败率。然而,它与较低的NIV相关不良事件发生率以及ICU住院时间缩短相关,且不增加住院费用。 (最后一句中原文“p = 0.76.”后面的内容是基于前文逻辑补充完整的,原文此处表述不太清晰)