Weir Matthew R, Berger Jeffrey S, Ashton Veronica, Laliberté François, Brown Kip, Lefebvre Patrick, Schein Jeffrey
a Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA.
b New York University School of Medicine , New York , NY , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1891-1900. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1339674. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Renal dysfunction is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and is an independent predictor of stroke and systemic embolism. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with renal dysfunction may face a particularly high risk of thromboembolism and bleeding. The current retrospective cohort study was designed to assess the impact of renal function on ischemic stroke and major bleeding rates in NVAF patients in the real-world setting (outside a clinical trial).
Medical claims and Electronic Health Records were retrieved retrospectively from Optum's Integrated Claims-Clinical de-identified dataset from May 2011 to August 2014. Patients with NVAF treated with warfarin (2468) or rivaroxaban (1290) were selected. Each treatment cohort was stratified by baseline estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) levels. Confounding adjustments were made using inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTWs). Incidence rates and hazard ratios of ischemic stroke and major bleeding events were calculated for both cohorts.
Overall, patients treated with rivaroxaban had an ischemic stroke incidence rate of 1.9 per 100 person-years (PY) while patients treated with warfarin had a rate of 4.2 per 100 PY (HR = 0.41 [0.21-0.80], p = .009). Rivaroxaban patients with an eCrCl below 50 mL/min (N = 229) had an ischemic stroke rate of 0.8 per 100 PY, while the rate for the warfarin cohort (N = 647) was 6.0 per 100 PY (HR = 0.09 [0.01-0.72], p = .02). For the other renal function levels (i.e. eCrCl 50-80 and ≥80 mL/min) HRs indicated no statistically significant differences in ischemic stroke risks. Bleeding events did not differ significantly between cohorts stratified by renal function.
Ischemic stroke rates were significantly lower in the overall NVAF population for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin users, including patients with eCrCl below 50 mL/min. For all renal function groups, major bleeding risks were not statistically different between treatment groups.
肾功能不全与心血管疾病风险增加相关,并且是中风和全身性栓塞的独立预测因素。肾功能不全的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者可能面临特别高的血栓栓塞和出血风险。当前这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估在现实环境(非临床试验)中肾功能对NVAF患者缺血性中风和大出血发生率的影响。
从Optum的综合索赔-临床去识别数据集回顾性检索2011年5月至2014年8月的医疗索赔和电子健康记录。选取接受华法林(2468例)或利伐沙班(1290例)治疗的NVAF患者。每个治疗队列按基线估计肌酐清除率(eCrCl)水平分层。使用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)进行混杂调整。计算两个队列缺血性中风和大出血事件的发生率及风险比。
总体而言,接受利伐沙班治疗的患者缺血性中风发生率为每100人年1.9例,而接受华法林治疗的患者发生率为每100人年4.2例(风险比=0.41[0.21 - 0.80],p = 0.009)。eCrCl低于50 mL/分钟的利伐沙班患者(N = 229)缺血性中风发生率为每100人年0.8例;而华法林队列(N = 647)为每100人年6.0例(风险比=0.09[0.01 - 0.72],p = 0.02)。对于其他肾功能水平(即eCrCl 50 - 80和≥80 mL/分钟),风险比表明缺血性中风风险无统计学显著差异。按肾功能分层的队列之间出血事件无显著差异。
在总体NVAF人群中,利伐沙班使用者的缺血性中风发生率显著低于华法林使用者,包括eCrCl低于50 mL/分钟的患者。对于所有肾功能组,治疗组之间大出血风险无统计学差异。