Suppr超能文献

美国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中预防的真实世界证据:REVISIT-US研究

Real-world evidence of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States: the REVISIT-US study.

作者信息

Coleman Craig I, Antz Matthias, Bowrin Kevin, Evers Thomas, Simard Edgar P, Bonnemeier Hendrik, Cappato Riccardo

机构信息

a University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy , Storrs , CT , USA.

b Hospital Oldenburg , Department of Cardiology , Oldenburg , Germany.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Dec;32(12):2047-2053. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1237937. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little data exists regarding the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients treated outside of clinical trials.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study using MarketScan claims from January 2012 to October 2014. We included adults, newly initiated on rivaroxaban, apixaban or warfarin, with a baseline CHADS-VASc score ≥2, ≥2 diagnosis codes for NVAF and ≥180 days of continuous medical and prescription benefits. Patients with a prior stroke, systemic embolism or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded. Eligible rivaroxaban or apixaban users were 1:1 propensity-score matched individually to warfarin users. Cox regression was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for rivaroxaban and apixaban versus warfarin for the combined endpoint of ischemic stroke or ICH and each endpoint individually.

RESULTS

Upon matching 11,411 rivaroxaban to 11,411 warfarin users, rivaroxaban was associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint of ischemic stroke or ICH versus warfarin (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.45-0.82). ICH was significantly (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.35-0.79) and ischemic stroke nonsignificantly reduced (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.47-1.07) by rivaroxaban versus warfarin. After matching 4083 apixaban and 4083 warfarin users, apixaban was found to nonsignificantly reduce the combined endpoint of ischemic stroke or ICH versus warfarin (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.35-1.12) and to reduce ICH risk (HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.17-0.88). Ischemic stroke risk was nonsignificantly increased with apixaban (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.49-2.63) versus warfarin.

LIMITATIONS

Sample size and number of combined events observed were relatively small. Residual confounding could not be ruled out.

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban and apixaban were associated with less ICH than warfarin and both are likely associated with reductions in the combined endpoint. Further investigation to validate the numerically higher rate of ischemic stroke with apixaban versus warfarin is required.

摘要

背景

关于在临床试验之外接受治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,利伐沙班或阿哌沙班相对于华法林的有效性和安全性的数据较少。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,使用了2012年1月至2014年10月的MarketScan索赔数据。我们纳入了开始新使用利伐沙班、阿哌沙班或华法林的成年人,其基线CHADS-VASc评分≥2,有≥2个NVAF诊断代码且有≥180天的连续医疗和处方福利。排除既往有中风、全身性栓塞或颅内出血(ICH)的患者。符合条件的利伐沙班或阿哌沙班使用者与华法林使用者按1:1倾向评分进行个体匹配。进行Cox回归以估计利伐沙班和阿哌沙班相对于华法林在缺血性中风或ICH联合终点以及各个终点的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在将11411名利伐沙班使用者与11411名华法林使用者匹配后,与华法林相比,利伐沙班与缺血性中风或ICH联合终点的显著降低相关(HR = 0.61,95% CI = 0.45 - 0.82)。与华法林相比,利伐沙班使ICH显著降低(HR = 0.53,95% CI = 0.35 - 0.79),而缺血性中风降低不显著(HR = 0.71,95% CI = 0.47 - 1.07)。在将4083名阿哌沙班使用者与4083名华法林使用者匹配后,发现与华法林相比,阿哌沙班使缺血性中风或ICH联合终点降低不显著(HR = 0.63,95% CI = 0.35 - 1.12),并降低了ICH风险(HR = 0.38,95% CI = 0.17 - 0.88)。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班使缺血性中风风险增加不显著(HR = 1.13,95% CI = 从0.49 - 2.63)。

局限性

观察到的样本量和联合事件数量相对较小。无法排除残余混杂因素。

结论

与华法林相比,利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与较少的ICH相关,并且两者都可能与联合终点的降低相关。需要进一步研究以验证阿哌沙班相对于华法林在缺血性中风发生率上数值较高的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验